Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for محافظ💜

Channel

محافظ💜

@FlT_BODY

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

301subscribers

-48,886 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139578786
TypeChannel
Username@FlT_BODY
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FlT_BODY

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27049,18724,728.56 August 2026 — 49,187 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,080 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,012 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,950 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,880 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,798 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,743 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,694 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,627 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,528 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,488 subscribers18 August 2026 — 48,453 subscribers19 August 2026 — 48,426 subscribers20 August 2026 — 48,380 subscribers21 August 2026 — 48,341 subscribers22 August 2026 — 270 subscribers29 August 2026 — 300 subscribers8 September 2026 — 301 subscribers3016 August 20268 September 2026
19 measurements spanning 33 days, net -48,886. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 03:37301+1
29 Aug 2026, 13:14300+30
22 Aug 2026, 21:13270-48,071
21 Aug 2026, 09:0748,341-39
20 Aug 2026, 10:2548,380-46
19 Aug 2026, 12:5548,426-27
18 Aug 2026, 15:1248,453-35
17 Aug 2026, 15:0748,488-40
16 Aug 2026, 06:4748,528-99
14 Aug 2026, 14:1448,627-67
13 Aug 2026, 01:1648,694-49
12 Aug 2026, 16:4348,743no change
12 Aug 2026, 04:2648,743-55
11 Aug 2026, 07:2248,798-82
10 Aug 2026, 10:5448,880-70
9 Aug 2026, 08:0748,950-62
8 Aug 2026, 08:2049,012-68
7 Aug 2026, 05:2049,080-107
6 Aug 2026, 02:0349,187first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
809.8%
avg views ÷ 301 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,440
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
71
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held78 (8 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total173,058
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6h 41m
Average length
6m 48s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC669 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐حرکت اصلاحی👩 ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

21 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐تمرین در خانه با کش ورزشی🦈 یکی از اشتباه‌های رایج اینه که فکر کنیم چون کش سبک‌تر از دستگاه یا هالتره، هیچ فشاری به مفاصل وارد نمی‌کنه.اما واقعیت اینه که کش لوپ به‌خصوص در حرکات پایین‌تنه، نیروی جانبی ایجاد می‌کنه و اگر تکنیک درست نباشه یا مقاومت کش بیشتر از توان فرد باشه، ممکنه باعث بشه زانو به داخل یا خارج منحرف بشه، لگن از وضعیت طبیعی خارج بشه و فشار غیرضروری به مفاصل و بافت‌های اطراف وارد بشه. پس اگر از کش لوپ اس

21 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐چند حرکت ساده برای کمر درد❤️ ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

21 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐تمرین با کش پیلاتس🌙 ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

21 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐30 روز چالش فیت شدن🤩💛 ┤روز هجدهم ┤15دقیقه تمرین با وزنه ┤افزایش چربی سوزی ┤ دیدن روز قبلی ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

20 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐تمرین فول بادی☁️ ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

20 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐ددلیفت💭 فاصله پاها توی هر حرکت نقش خیلی مهمی دارن 🔸توی اسکوات پاها به اندازه عرض شونه باز باشه 🔸توی ددلیفت کمی جمع تر 🔸توی سومو اسکوات بازتر از حالت معمول اگه فاصله پاها درست نباشه،هم فشار روی عضلات کمتر میشه و هم احتمال آسیب بالا میره☁️ ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

20 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐تمرین برای باسن🎀 ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

20 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐30 روز چالش فیت شدن🤩💛 ┤روز هفدهم ┤17 دقیقه فرم دهی ┤فرم دهی عضلات شکم ┤ دیدن روز قبلی ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

19 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐تمرین برای فرم دهی و لیفت باسن🌙 ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

19 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 22 August 2026

🎀 فردا و پس فردا کنکوره؛ اولاً که براتون آرزوی موفقیت توی کنکور میکنم، دوماً که بهت میگم اگر نشد فدای سرت، هزار تا راه برای موفقیت هست که یکیش کنکوره، اگر اونی نشد که تو میخوای ناامید نشو و راه های دیگه رو امتحان کن. ❤️ ؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

19 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,530 viewsread 22 August 2026
Video

┐انواع پلانک☁️ ┘؛❲ғɪᴛ ʙᴏᴅʏ❳

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @FlT_BODY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@FlT_BODY edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 83 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پشتیبان ورزش با رقص
@varzesh_ba_raaghs · 1,263
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
‹ خانم عکاس📸 ›
@iphotographr · 68,553
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
"𝐐𝐨𝐟𝐥𝐞 𝐀𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠" آهنگای قفلی
@QofleAhang · 62,850
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محافظ💜” (@FlT_BODY), 301 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FlT_BODY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.