Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GemDao Ventures Reviews

Channel

GemDao Ventures Reviews

@GEMDAOreview

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,596subscribers

-3,777 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002140943976
TypeChannel
Username@GEMDAOreview
Descriptionhttps://x.com/gemdaoventures Founder: @Dan_Hamss Co-Founder: @DC_Gemdao
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GEMDAOreview

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,59613,72411,1607 August 2026 — 12,373 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,373 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,308 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,223 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,152 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,076 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,872 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,553 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,416 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,893 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,634 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,616 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,621 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,064 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,047 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,889 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,858 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,695 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,592 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,339 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,220 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,970 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,724 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,459 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,444 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,354 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,185 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,794 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,648 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,591 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,525 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,516 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,421 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,918 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,692 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,672 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,647 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,630 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,596 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
41 measurements spanning 91 days, net -3,777. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,827–14,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:468,596-34
3 Nov 2026, 07:468,630-17
30 Oct 2026, 22:558,647-25
27 Oct 2026, 23:278,672-20
24 Oct 2026, 23:088,692-226
22 Oct 2026, 07:318,918-1,503
20 Oct 2026, 21:2610,421-95
19 Oct 2026, 20:1710,516-9
18 Oct 2026, 17:1610,525-66
17 Oct 2026, 19:0110,591-57
16 Oct 2026, 18:2910,648-146
15 Oct 2026, 16:0610,794-391
14 Oct 2026, 15:3511,185-169
13 Oct 2026, 03:3711,354-1,090
8 Oct 2026, 17:1612,444-1,015
4 Oct 2026, 07:3713,459-265
25 Sept 2026, 18:1713,724+4,754
15 Sept 2026, 18:388,970-250
11 Sept 2026, 16:179,220-119
7 Sept 2026, 11:579,339first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.90%
avg views ÷ 8,596 subscribers
Avg views / post
593
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.153%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held53 (21 July 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total2,964
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,700
Videos
≈87
Links
≈2,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 01s
Average length
3m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤666.7%
🔥222.2%
😁111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 12:12 UTC566 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x5! 👋 @GEMDAOreview made a x5+ call on Full.fun. $347K ➡️ $1.7M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔹 DACITY - TRENDING #1

27 Oct 2026, 07:10 UTC571 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x3! ☝️ @GEMDAOreview made a x3+ call on Full.fun. $347K ➡️ $1.1M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 REMUS - TRENDING #2

26 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC578 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: Back with a bang! 💥 After a few days of no calls, @GEMDAOreview made a x2+ call on Full.fun. $347K ➡️ $696K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔸 IRYS - TRENDING #2

26 Oct 2026, 16:51 UTC597 viewsread 7 November 2026

Full token: https://www.full.fun/robinhood/0x1aac7938e244151be1b59de6b20a9fdac5d69999

16 Oct 2026, 00:40 UTC652 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x945626601703d126877c33a3d0def244c833550d Maybe good !!! Dyor

🔥1

7 Oct 2026, 01:52 UTC673 viewsread 7 November 2026

3CrvvHzAYTRFYatnLzV6ANPfvUCu56pPojG2ZSuqpump Gamble dyor

2 Oct 2026, 14:27 UTC663 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: Back In Town 🤠 @GEMDAOreview made a x2+ call for Hit on BSC after a time away from the chain. $20K ➡️ $94K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 Agency - TRENDING #1

2 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC614 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

0xf0dbbb200a6e271efb980253d8347f3ff43f7777 Try this

❤1

23 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC640 viewsread 7 November 2026

https://t.me/ginnancommunity https://x.com/ginnancatrh https://ginnanrh.fun/ https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/0xb47ebe08ed17b0f6a51e8fd8050ab5e9ca1dcc2b

22 Sept 2026, 01:46 UTC675 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x3! ☝️ @GEMDAOreview made a x3+ call on Bankr. $81K ➡️ $268K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts

21 Sept 2026, 06:12 UTC646 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x4! 🖖 @GEMDAOreview made a x4+ call on GOLDEN BULL. $333K ➡️ $1.3M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @GEMDAOreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@GEMDAOreview edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gogeta Crypto Chad$
@gogetacalls · 58,441
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
Shakers Calls
@marine_CryptoCalls · 74,125
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GemDao Ventures Reviews” (@GEMDAOreview), 8,596 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GEMDAOreview.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.