Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НАБАТ | GoDrone

Channel

НАБАТ | GoDrone

@GoDrone

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,164subscribers

-187 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001773438128
TypeChannel
Username@GoDrone
Created29 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GoDrone

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,16212,35112,256.56 August 2026 — 12,351 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,351 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,343 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,341 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,337 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,332 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,328 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,322 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,222 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,219 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,207 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,206 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,207 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,204 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,201 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,198 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,189 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,180 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,174 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,175 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,174 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,168 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,165 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,162 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,173 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,164 subscribers12,1646 August 20265 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,134–12,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:0012,164-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:1712,173+11
2 Sept 2026, 07:4712,162-3
1 Sept 2026, 08:2812,165-3
31 Aug 2026, 05:5712,168-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:5812,174-1
29 Aug 2026, 03:3812,175+4
28 Aug 2026, 07:1212,171-3
27 Aug 2026, 08:4512,174-6
26 Aug 2026, 07:5312,180-9
24 Aug 2026, 09:0312,189-9
21 Aug 2026, 02:0612,198-3
20 Aug 2026, 02:1612,201-3
19 Aug 2026, 02:2212,204-3
18 Aug 2026, 01:2712,207+1
16 Aug 2026, 22:1512,206-1
15 Aug 2026, 12:5912,207-12
13 Aug 2026, 23:1512,219-3
12 Aug 2026, 18:1512,222-100
11 Aug 2026, 17:4212,322first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 12,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.467%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
79
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held107 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total122,075
Reactions total570
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 58s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

745 reactions across 97 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20928.1%
13418.0%
🤔13317.9%
🔥8611.5%
💯557.38%
🙏405.37%
212.82%
😱162.15%
👌121.61%
👏111.48%
😎91.21%
🫡91.21%
custom 529643346617749516560.805%
custom 521773870455825293830.403%
🕊10.134%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 844 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:26 UTC615 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🏎В Китае начали делать быстровозводимые макеты техники На фоне деревянных макетов, периодически использующихся на СВО, решение более технологичное. Надувной макет можно разместить за минуты, а процесс его изготовления на заводе намного проще, чем создание фанерного аналога в полевых условиях. 📌В современной войне дешевых технологий ложная техника — очень хорошая вещь. Отличить настоящий танк от ложного даже в дорог

👍7🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC722 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🎯Даже дешёвая учебная ракета не делает HIMARS дешёвым оружием ⠀ Lockheed Martin провела вторые лётные испытания новой учебной ракеты JR3 для HIMARS и M270. Она должна позволить расчётам чаще тренироваться без расхода дорогих боевых боеприпасов. ⠀ ◾️JR3 поставляется в 24-зарядном многоразовом пусковом контейнере и построена на уже отработанной технологии двигателя. Идея понятна: снизить цену каждого учебного пуска и д

2🤔1

2 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,250 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📡Что такое интермодуляция простыми словами? Представим, что рядом работают два передатчика на разных частотах. В идеальной системе они никак не должны создавать третий сигнал. Но если усилитель, приёмник или другой элемент радиотракта работает нелинейно, два сигнала начинают «смешиваться». ⠀ ◾️В результате появляются новые частоты, которых изначально не было. Именно это и называется интермодуляцией. Причём одна из н

1🤔1

1 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC861 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @ecotoporPhoto

Фермера оштрафовали за пожар на поле после падения обломков БПЛА. 64-летнего Александра из Ростовской области обязали заплатить 60 тысяч рублей за то, что он вовремя не перекопал стерню и не убрал пожнивные остатки. Владельцы поля утверждают, что чётких сроков для таких работ в законе нет, а сам фермер в это время спасал урожай на другом участке. По словам местных жителей, подобные штрафы для фермеров уже не единичны

😱102🤔1custom 52177387045582529381

1 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC973 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚡️Летающая электростанция сегодня — высотная платформа завтра В Китае испытали привязной аэростат S4000, который поднялся на высоту 4 000 метров, выработал электроэнергию за счёт высотного ветра и вернулся на землю. По размерам аппарат сопоставим с Boeing 747 и наполнен гелием. ⠀ ◾️Идея проекта — поднять турбины туда, где ветер сильнее и стабильнее, чем у поверхности. Электроэнергия передаётся на землю по привязному

🤔5💯31

1 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,050 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

ЧВК «Озончик»: начало😁 #мемо_лет ⭐️ GoDrone.ru | Проголосовать за канал

🔥13😎2

1 Sept 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,730 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🗺Что такое разрешение радара по дальности? Радар может видеть две цели на одной линии, но это ещё не значит, что он сможет показать их как два отдельных объекта. Если расстояние между ними слишком маленькое, отражённые сигналы сливаются — и система воспринимает их как одну отметку. ◾️Разрешение по дальности — это минимальная разница в расстоянии, при которой радар ещё способен разделить две цели. Чем лучше это разр

4👌1

31 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC891 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @expensive_hurmaPhoto

Минбуквы продолжает победоносное наступление на цифровизацию и россиян Минбуквы придумало, как эффективнее бороться с VPN. Разрешённые государством сайты хотят отделить от остального интернета, чтобы запрещённое было удобнее блокировать, а средства обхода не могли прятаться среди чего-нибудь официально одобренного. Момент выбран прекрасный. Мир входит в новый технологический передел: американцы и китайцы вливают со

🤔72

31 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC937 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔥Испытание огнём: «Набат V.3» выдержал две атаки и пожар, сохранив боеспособность Противник вскрыл блиндаж наших военнослужащих путём воздушной разведки и нанёс первый групповой удар БпЛА-камикадзе по выявленным координатам. Благодаря заблаговременному перехвату видеоразведки с дронов противника личный состав был готов к атаке — жертв среди военнослужащих нет. Антенна детектора (подчеркнём: это пассивное приёмное у

👍6🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC916 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @crimea24newPhoto

МОГ Крыма получили детекторы «Набат V.3» для борьбы с дронами в «мёртвой зоне» Устройства сканируют воздушное пространство на высоте от 0 до 100 метров от уровня земли. На таких высотах стандартные радиолокационные станции часто принимают вражеские беспилотники за помехи, и противник активно пытается использовать эту «мёртвую зону», запуская малогабаритные БПЛА и дрономатки для FPV-камикадзе. «Набат V.3» уже испы

🔥171

31 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈1,550 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Пару слов про «технологическое превосходство» противника В последнее время в патриотическом Telegram появляются мнения: «у противника есть технологическое превосходство», «ВСУ снабжает технологиями все НАТО» и тому подобное. ◾️Что мы видим на практике? На прикрепленных фото — обломки вражеского мидлстрайка. В них: — китайский мотор SunnySky; — китайский полетник Matek; — китайский ESC HobbyWing; — китайский БЭК.

🔥4👌32👍1

31 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC≈1,750 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚀Почему большой аккумулятор иногда уменьшает дальность полёта Кажется очевидным: больше ёмкость — дальше полёт. Но у БПЛА дополнительная батарея сама становится грузом, который нужно постоянно поднимать и разгонять. ◾️С ростом массы винтам приходится создавать больше тяги даже в обычном горизонтальном полёте. Для этого моторы потребляют больше мощности, а часть добавленной энергии начинает уходить просто на перенос

4👌2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @GoDrone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@GoDrone edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАБАТ | GoDrone” (@GoDrone), 12,164 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoDrone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.