Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مثلاً روانشناسم!

Channel

مثلاً روانشناسم!

@HadisPsychologist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,721subscribers

+433 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180676122
TypeChannel
Username@HadisPsychologist
Descriptionمثلاً روانشناسی که واقعاً زبان تدریس می‌کنه‌. برای توئی که طالب یادگیری زبان هستی. t.me/EnglisHadis @harfoohadis .کانالی برای حرف و حدیث‌هامون برای هماهنگی تبلیغات و خرید دوره. @Hadiss2122
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HadisPsychologist

Growth

13,28813,73313,510.56 August 2026 — 13,288 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,376 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,407 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,430 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,465 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,483 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,492 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,550 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,559 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,597 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,607 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,627 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,672 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,701 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,706 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,733 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,721 subscribers13,7216 August 202627 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net +433. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,221–13,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 00:5613,721-12
25 Aug 2026, 23:1613,733+27
25 Aug 2026, 02:3213,706+5
23 Aug 2026, 14:4913,701+29
22 Aug 2026, 01:5813,672+45
20 Aug 2026, 17:1313,627+20
19 Aug 2026, 17:0513,607+10
18 Aug 2026, 16:4613,597+16
17 Aug 2026, 16:5713,581+22
16 Aug 2026, 14:1713,559+9
14 Aug 2026, 21:4813,550+13
13 Aug 2026, 12:3813,537+45
12 Aug 2026, 11:0713,492+9
11 Aug 2026, 10:4313,483+18
10 Aug 2026, 13:4513,465+35
9 Aug 2026, 10:1113,430+23
8 Aug 2026, 13:4113,407+31
7 Aug 2026, 15:3513,376+62
6 Aug 2026, 16:1013,314+26
6 Aug 2026, 04:5213,288first reading

Engagement

273 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 13,721 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
273 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
273
of 273 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held273 (5 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total615,494
Reactions total14,766
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
321
Videos
44
Links
319

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,251 reactions across 263 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,32851.4%
🤝3,12221.9%
💘2,13115.0%
💔8756.14%
🍓5053.54%
🕊2902.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 273 of the 273 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,766reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 273 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 273 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HadisPsychologist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 273 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 27 August 2026

روژینا وقتی پیام‌های کانالت رو می‌خونم، نمی‌دونم کدوم یکی رو برای فوروارد انتخاب کنم. از بس همه‌شون حرف دل منه.

2

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC362 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhoanazhina

اگه کنش و واکنش یه نفر برات در هاله‌ای از ابهامه، به‌جای اینکه هی براش روایت ببافی و توجیه سرِهم کنی، ببین حضورش چه اندازه طمأنینه و آرامش روانی بهت تزریق می‌کنه. رابطه‌ای واقعاً سالمه که احتیاج به نسخه‌خوانی و توضیح اضافه نداشته باشه، مغزتو تو مارپیچ سردرگمی نندازه و مجبورت نکنه دائماً نقش کارآگاه حدس‌زن رو بازی کنی.

💘41

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,070 views42 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @In_Search_of_San_Francisco

دارم تغییر می‌کنم و یک‌سری از دَرهارو می‌بندم، چون باور دارم باید از دست بدی تا به‌دست بیاری؛ پس مراقب باش وسط موندن یا نموندن‌ت، نمونی لای دَر.

💘307🤝5

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,300 views43 reactionsread 27 August 2026

وقتی اشتیاق ما برای دوست داشته شدن توسط دیگران از دوست داشتن خودمون جلو می‌زنه، وارد یه بازی خطرناک می‌شیم. به این صورت که برای اینکه بقیه ما رو دوست داشته باشن، شروع می‌کنیم به تغییر دادن خودمون. ماسک می‌زنیم، نظرات خودمون رو پنهون می‌کنیم و خودمون رو اون‌طوری نشون می‌دیم که خوشایند باشه. این یعنی داریم ذره ذره از خودمون فاصله می‌گیریم. وقتی من خودم رو دوست ندارم، تمام منبع ارزشمندی که برای احساس خوب داشتن نیاز دارم

38💔2💘2🕊1

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,710 views80 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

از امروز.

💘66🍓85🕊1

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,410 views28 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjomanposhti

اگه واقعیت‌ُ عقب بندازی، عوض نمیشه.

🤝224💘2

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,710 views47 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026

خوب زندگی کردن، خودش بالاترین نوع موفقیته. رهایی از فشار بیرونی جامعه برای مدام شوآف کردنِ دستاوردها، به آدم حسِ آزادی می‌ده. وقتی فشار و وسواسِ حتماً باید موفق بشم رو از روی دوشت برمی‌داری و تمرکزت رو می‌ذاری روی لذت بردن از کاری که داری انجام می‌دی، اتفاقاً احتمال موفقیتت خیلی بیشتر هم می‌شه، چون دیگه بدون فرسودگی و از سر عشق و سرخوشی داری پیش می‌ری. زندگی یه مقصدی نیست که بهش برسیم و تیکِش رو بزنیم؛ زندگی خودِ همی

39🤝6💘1🕊1

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

27 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,900 views51 reactionsread 27 August 2026

نوشته بود: من هرگز در زندگی‌ام چهره‌ی زشتی ندیده‌ام؛ اگر کسی به نظرم زشت می‌آمد، بخاطر قلبش بود‌.

💘417💔3

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

26 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC≈1,860 views17 reactionsread 27 August 2026
File

@HadisPsychologist

11💘3🕊3

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

26 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC≈4,130 views65 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026

همه‌ی آدم‌ها بلدن. اگه انجام نمی‌دن، انتخاب کردن که انجام ندن. همین.

52🤝8💘5

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

26 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,990 views147 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @maroom105

شمام هر روز بسته اینترنت یک‌ماهه می‌خرین؟

🤝119💔14💘14

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

26 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,900 views54 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @nassiminufoo

اگر دیگران به شما نشان دادند امن نیستند، توصیه می کنم باورشان کنید. اینجا

🤝45💔4🍓2💘21

Signed حدیث عبّاسی

Showing the 12 most recent of 273 posts we hold for @HadisPsychologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,485 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

مَرد سان‌فرانسیسکویی
@In_Search_of_San_Francisco · 17,469
3 posts
چَتری برای بارش‌هایم.
@Chatrifor · 101
2 posts
روزمرگی‌های یک روان‌درمانگر
@DarmangarDanial · 25,980
2 posts
FOu!
@F0o0u · 7,798
2 posts
فانِوشت
@fanevesht · 64
2 posts
AseMooN!
@Myesky · 2,016
2 posts
آنه‌شرلی𐙚 ‌
@anesherlliii · 1,256
1 post
«سه‌شنبه‌ها با دایانودو🦕»
@anjomanposhti · 28,191
1 post
Autumn Girl
@autumnngiirl · 46
1 post
یادداشت‌های‌شِلبی.
@CallMeSamiShelby · 2,494
1 post
𝘾𝙪𝙢𝙪𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙢𝙗𝙪𝙨
@cumulonimbusvibe · 53
1 post
Emily
@emilyypi · 1,892
1 post
Eunoia🌱یونویا
@eunoia_psychology · 145
1 post
من !
@fandoghtweets · 6,811
1 post
«قلم‌گاه»
@Ghalam_Gah · 2,998
1 post
سفر کوانتومی وال تنها.
@im_orkide · 1,264
1 post
شاسوسا
@itsaboutfarfar · 1,024
1 post
I am me
@justjointhis8 · 110
1 post
ساقی
@justsaqhiandme · 2,997
1 post
خطِ فاج
@khatefaj · 2,096
1 post
𝕯𝖗𝖆𝖌𝖔𝖓
@lDragoonl · 2,117
1 post
MightyAphrodite
@mightbeamightyafroditte · 48
1 post
نور گمشدهٔ من 🤍
@My_Lost_Light · 274
1 post
𝗣𝗦𝗬𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗬🧠✨
@nephophilepink · 1,069
1 post
روان درمانگرِ ٫آینده٫
@pen296 · 585
1 post
Sahar Pharma
@pharmacistsahar · 1,173
1 post
𝗣𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺💕
@piinkdreamm · 155
1 post
آبیِ سنگین
@prvaz_ir · 1,169
1 post
راسکولنیکف”
@Rasskolnikof · 1,508
1 post
ᴿ ᴱ ᴳ ᴵ ᴺ ᴬ
@reginaamoon · 2,297
1 post
نباید ساکت می‌ماندیم
@remambargirl · 5,481
1 post
روحي🖤
@ROHI_19E · 639
1 post
Sepide !
@sepiderutin · 3,987
1 post
🕊️❄️✨⟨اورکا⟩
@ThelonelistwhaleB · 433
1 post
𝒁𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒐𝒌
@zarrokm · 821
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

روزمرگی‌های یک روان‌درمانگر
@DarmangarDanial · 25,980
4 posts
مَرد سان‌فرانسیسکویی
@In_Search_of_San_Francisco · 17,469
4 posts
«سه‌شنبه‌ها با دایانودو🦕»
@anjomanposhti · 28,191
3 posts
چَتری برای بارش‌هایم.
@Chatrifor · 101
3 posts
FOu!
@F0o0u · 7,798
3 posts
ساقی
@justsaqhiandme · 2,997
3 posts
عاشق تمام خواهد شد.
@azghambego · 1,923
2 posts
EL vIsiOn
@channelel98vision · 4,847
2 posts
را.
@channellra · 1,037
2 posts
BaHadis
@EnglisHadis · 2,858
2 posts
Live.
@kiana_lifffe · 3,211
2 posts
𝕯𝖗𝖆𝖌𝖔𝖓
@lDragoonl · 2,117
2 posts
مخفیگاه من
@makhfigaheman · 3,596
2 posts
Honeymoon
@manhoneymoonammm · 3,240
2 posts
می‌خواهم زنده بمانم
@Mkhmzndebmanam · 465
2 posts
AseMooN!
@Myesky · 2,016
2 posts
ufo
@nassiminufoo · 16,510
2 posts
رِیـحـــاٰن
@reyhaani_i · 3,635
2 posts
• ماتیلدای خسته
@tiredmatilda · 7,636
2 posts
واگویه ›
@Vaguooyeh · 5,309
2 posts
13:13
@A13v13a · 6,915
1 post
ابری‌کوچولو
@abrikoochooloo · 1,145
1 post
آنه‌شرلی𐙚 ‌
@anesherlliii · 1,256
1 post
آذر
@azaar_r · 5,531
1 post
دِرَنگ؛
@Deeraangg · 247
1 post
فانِوشت
@fanevesht · 64
1 post
جایی پایین جاده
@ftm_shargi · 1,308
1 post
همین چیزهای معمولی!
@haminchizhayemamoli · 2,428
1 post
کافه‌ مستاجر پلاک ۱۲
@HouseNumberrr12 · 1,779
1 post
دُری گمشده
@IhaveNoFuckingClue · 1,976
1 post
سفر کوانتومی وال تنها.
@im_orkide · 1,264
1 post
مـلـجاْ 𖥔
@itsmalaja · 119
1 post
کُنجی در هیاهوی زمان
@konjidarhayhuyezaman · 2,562
1 post
-جستجو‌گرِ نور”
@lilslight · 2,386
1 post
فراتر از سطح
@LostAsFuckButMoving · 2,178
1 post
من؛ سارا
@mansaraa · 1,208
1 post
اتاق ۱۰۵
@maroom105 · 1,391
1 post
نیل‌سآ🪁
@Nila_nik7 · 1,641
1 post
روان درمانگرِ ٫آینده٫
@pen296 · 585
1 post
راوی
@Ra_vii3 · 104
1 post
روزهای بعد از ۲۷🪄
@soakrrr · 1,155
1 post
| آفتابگردون |
@sunwhiteflower · 714
1 post
تآسیان
@tasianmood · 726
1 post
یادداشت‌های روان‌درمانگر آینده
@yaddasthaye_man · 1,217
1 post
𝒁𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒐𝒌
@zarrokm · 821
1 post
هذیان گو
@zhoanazhina · 627
1 post
میم
@zizigolo2 · 2,004
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مثلاً روانشناسم!” (@HadisPsychologist), 13,721 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HadisPsychologist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.