Channel
@IASdwijgoel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,641subscribers
-135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001843195169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IASdwijgoel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IASdwijgoel |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 26,641 | -15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 26,656 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 26,663 | -23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 26,686 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 26,702 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 26,713 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 26,730 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 26,728 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 26,725 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 26,743 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 26,747 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 26,753 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 26,756 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 26,759 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 26,758 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 26,762 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 26,759 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 26,768 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 26,774 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 26,775 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,066 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 941 | 88.3% | |
| 👏 | 51 | 4.78% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 1.59% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 0.938% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 0.75% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.563% | |
| 🤷♀ | 6 | 0.563% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 0.469% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.469% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.375% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.375% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 0.375% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.188% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,066 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Also, 4 questions from Ethics in the prelims paper shows that it is more about integrated study now. Syllabus is what is given for mains. I hope the people who have studied ethics beforehand got some advantage. At this point, I’ll also recommend that the people who are getting marks on safer side should start preparing for Essay and Ethics after rest of 2 days. It’s important to not miss the most important days!!
❤125😁10
Hello folks!! Prelims 2026 paper was indeed very unpredictable and difficult to be aligned with the syllabus. After going through many questions of the paper myself, I was shocked to see that my so called “tricks” were also not working (leave apart knowledge). Already lot of buzz in market around that. Take some rest. Relax for a while. Let the dust settle.
❤118😢5
Hello everyone! This is Ankit Agrawal (AIR 217, CSE 2025). Welcome to this channel where I will be sharing my learnings, strategies, and honest experiences from the UPSC journey. This has been a long and evolving journey for me, involving 6 attempts, 5 Mains, 4 Interviews, and 3 final selections. Each phase taught me something new about preparation, mindset, and perseverance. My optional subject is Geography. Th…
❤63👏8👍4
For the benefit of people trying to learn something out of topper’s approach. Ankit has cracked this examination thrice. His insights are of good use for the community.
❤1
Heartiest congratulations to the selected ones. Enjoy your time!✨
❤70👏1
एक तमाशा शोर का कल फिर से झेला जाएगा एक पत्थर आस का सांसों से खेला जाएगा कल तभी तो आएगा जब आज खेला जाएगा Good days will come! To everyone who came short this time, we will see the light. In one way or the other.
❤141👏2
Dr. Manoj has started an initiative to help the UPSC aspirants with current affairs and strategy after his experience of around 4 years in this journey. I came in contact with Manoj about 2 years ago and been in touch with him regarding his preparation. I hope his new initiative will help the aspirants community. https://youtu.be/Xm69RcZk6Wc https://youtu.be/IgeIY68gQRM?si=VtDt3D5ekdfI5VDr
❤48😢1
Happy to share that Asad Zuberi(IFS) and I will be present at the New Delhi World Book Fair 2026 for an interaction as co-authors of “Toppers’ Approach to Ethics”. We invite the upsc aspirants for a two-way interaction about their strategy, focus areas and assistance. We would be happy to help with your queries. Looking forward to meet the community soon. 12 January 2026 (Monday) at 4:00 PM, Stall U-16, Hall No. 6…
❤75🤷♀6🍾4👎4
Hello folks! Divyank(IAS 2024) has made a tg channel to help out the aspirants in their journey. He has incrementally improved in his attempts and his interview score shows a positive approach for aspirants appearing for personality test in coming days. His credentials are: AIR 21, cse 2024 AIR 357 , cse 2022 Maths optional - 295 Increased GS score from 335 to 435 Interview marks - 201, 190 https://t.me/divyankgup…
❤25🔥5👏1
Anthropology came alive! Shiwalik Fossils… Pictures from Asia’s largest terrestrial fossil park: Suketi Fossil Park (HP).
❤103👍11👏5😱5
Hello Folks!! The wait is over – the NEW EDITION of [Toppers Approach to Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude ] for the GS-4 Mains Exam is here! Designed with YOU in mind, this updated edition is packed with the latest insights, case studies, and exam-focused strategies to help you tackle the Ethics paper with confidence. What’s New in This Edition? * Contemporary Case Studies: Derived from Real-world examples/ current a…
❤29👏4👍2🤔2😢2
Hi folks, One of my mentees Mayuri has started to help other aspirants after her long journey of 5 years in UPSC. You can find her channel here, it may help Prelims 2026 aspirants. Hi Dwij Sir I hope you are doing good. Sir, I've started a telegram community where I've been helping the aspirants with respect to Prelims and Mains based on my experience of 5 years (4 attempts with 2 mains) If you feel that the c…
❤90😈5💋4👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @IASdwijgoel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dwij Goel IAS, AIR 71” (@IASdwijgoel), 26,641 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IASdwijgoel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.