These are not really summaries, just a collection of things i liked from the book/i wish to implement!
❤113🦄10👍7🫡3🕊1🤝1

Channel
@mehak_jainAIR17
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,688subscribers
+914 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628915849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mehak_jainAIR17 |
| Description | Hello everyone. I am Mehak Jain, AIR 17 in UPSC CSE 2021. Follow the channel for notes and insights on UPSC CSE. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mehak_jainAIR17 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 59,688 | +35 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 59,653 | +24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 59,629 | +12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 59,617 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 59,614 | +68 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 59,546 | +15 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 59,531 | +29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 59,502 | +42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:52 | 59,460 | +19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:06 | 59,441 | +11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 59,430 | +21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 59,409 | +11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 59,398 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 59,383 | +18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 59,365 | +27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 59,338 | +19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 59,319 | +25 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 59,294 | +86 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 59,208 | +51 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 59,157 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (19 October 2025 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 38,400 |
| Reactions total | 303 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
8,445 reactions across 22 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,930 | 82.1% | |
| 👌 | 315 | 3.73% | |
| 🙏 | 153 | 1.81% | |
| 🔥 | 128 | 1.52% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 1.42% | |
| 💯 | 108 | 1.28% | |
| 🦄 | 108 | 1.28% | |
| 🕊 | 98 | 1.16% | |
| 🫡 | 98 | 1.16% | |
| 😍 | 83 | 0.983% | |
| 👏 | 63 | 0.746% | |
| ⚡ | 48 | 0.568% | |
| 🎉 | 43 | 0.509% | |
| 🤩 | 41 | 0.485% | |
| 🤝 | 37 | 0.438% | |
| 🏆 | 33 | 0.391% | |
| 🥰 | 32 | 0.379% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 0.083% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,445 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
These are not really summaries, just a collection of things i liked from the book/i wish to implement!
❤113🦄10👍7🫡3🕊1🤝1
Book Summaries I have shared so far : 1. The Almanack of Naval Ravikant. 2. The Alchemist. 3. Same as Ever. 4. Essentialism - The Disciplined Pursuit of Less. 5. How to Win Friends and Influence People. 6. The Land of Seven Rivers 7. Breaking the Mould Happy Reading! ❤️
❤151👍9🙏6🤩1🫡1
TIME MANAGEMENT IN MAINS 🕰️ To be able to complete the paper in 3 hours is a task in itself and hence, it is a habit that you must cultivate and nurture all through your journey. Some quick fixes for the same can be : 1. You have to know what you are up against, before you approach it. So the first thing is to actually practice enough mock papers (10-12 in total) within the prescribed time limit. 📝 2. While you at…
❤408🙏33👍17🕊7🫡6🤝4💯1
ESSENTIALS OF A GOOD ANSWER 1. Mental frameworks - A good idea to start with. As beginners, you should have a rough frame of how you’re going to attempt the question. This frameworking time should eventually decrease and ultimately be done away with, when writing Mains (except for completely unknown questions). 2. Introduction - A 2-3 line introduction is a must. You can start off your answer with a definition or a…
❤327🙏35🫡14👍8🥰4⚡3🔥3👏1
Quick links to help you navigate through this channel 1. GS 1 Notes History History Personalities Art and Culture Geography Indian Society Indian Society Quick Notes World History Post Independence History GS 1 Test Papers GS 1 Sectional GS 1 Sectional GS 1 FLT 2. GS 2 Notes Polity IR IR International Organisations Social Justice GS 2 Test Papers GS 2 Sectional GS 2 FLT 3. GS 3 Notes Economy Agriculture Disaster…
❤213🫡16🦄7🙏5👍4🥰4🎉2🔥1
FRAMEWORKS FOR MAINS ANSWERS History Geography Art and Culture International Relations Indian Society Science and Technology Internal Security Agriculture Disaster Management Ethics USPC syllabus is the ultimate framework Happy Frame-working! ⚡️
❤193🔥9🙏7👌4👍3🕊3
Sharing for the benefit of those preparing for mains. Consolidated Post for Mains 1. GS paperwise content and strategy 2. Acing Public Administration 3. Essay essentials 4. Ethics 5. Current Affairs strategy 6. What constitutes a good answer? 7. How to use PYQs 8. Self-evaluating Answers 9. GS 1 (2023) solved 10. Time Management 11. Notes Making 12. PYQ topic wise compilation 13. Dealing with random questions 14. M…
❤201🫡14⚡7👍5🦄5👏1🔥1🕊1
Hi guys! You have done your bit. We can’t do much about the ever increasing absurdity and randomness of prelims. So those of you clearing this time, should make sure that you don’t have to appear for it again! For those of you who will unfortunately not be clearing this prelims, I know how it feels. Just one message for you - bide your time, hide your strength. And yes. Have a plan B!
❤90🦄13🤩4👏3
How was the prelims paper?
💯52🕊15❤13⚡5🦄5😇5🤩3🫡3
Taking up reading again after a long slump! Will try to share the learnings whenever possible.
❤147🕊8👌6🫡6🦄3⚡2🏆2👏2
Hi guys! Wishing you all, the very best of luck. Do remember that the d-day performance has more to do with calming your nerves than knowing it all. Prayers and wishes✨
❤451🙏44🤝6😍5🫡4👏3🦄3🏆2
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/opinion/technology-mental-fitness-cognitive.html?unlocked_article_code=1.WlA.6ZKN.Zf47rdbx8Sqm&smid=nytcore-ios-share Must read!
❤100💯19👏5🕊5👍4🙏4🤝3🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mehak_jainAIR17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 122 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mehak Jain, AIR 17 : Notes and Strategy” (@mehak_jainAIR17), 59,688 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mehak_jainAIR17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.