Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 82 days, net -23,877. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 23:30
8
+2
20 Oct 2026, 19:58
6
+1
14 Oct 2026, 02:44
5
+4
5 Oct 2026, 04:18
1
-23,169
28 Sept 2026, 12:00
23,170
-162
17 Sept 2026, 21:39
23,332
-23
15 Sept 2026, 18:16
23,355
-10
14 Sept 2026, 01:37
23,365
-30
12 Sept 2026, 09:36
23,395
-28
10 Sept 2026, 09:02
23,423
-59
7 Sept 2026, 01:38
23,482
-41
4 Sept 2026, 11:38
23,523
-27
3 Sept 2026, 01:19
23,550
-17
1 Sept 2026, 23:49
23,567
-21
31 Aug 2026, 23:27
23,588
-18
30 Aug 2026, 22:04
23,606
-12
30 Aug 2026, 00:26
23,618
-6
29 Aug 2026, 02:35
23,624
-7
28 Aug 2026, 00:24
23,631
-11
26 Aug 2026, 22:58
23,642
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 90 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
253 reactions across 50 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
143
56.5%
🔥
73
28.9%
👍
27
10.7%
🥴
8
3.16%
😍
2
0.791%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello all
I have left teaching completely and gave my 8 years in teaching students with honesty and gave a little bit of what I was aware of. Today I am going to transfer ownership of the channel to Prithu Jaiman who was also my student and gave 4 mains. I had been the part of many students in their success journey with ranks 4,7,43,47, 89, and many more.
Many of you are very eager to know what I am doing now:-
I a…
Current Affairs by Prithu pinned «in order to understand the linkage of these notes with the current affairs and understand the background and static part refer the video https://youtu.be/91YXO-zL61A?si=s1TWjK0kP_jtlbAp»
in order to understand the linkage of these notes with the current affairs and understand the background and static part refer the video
https://youtu.be/91YXO-zL61A?si=s1TWjK0kP_jtlbAp
What is Evergreening of the Patent?
A common term that is often used in the news related to IPR regime.
Suppose a company develops a medicine and gets a 20-year patent.
As the patent is about to expire, the company makes a small change to the medicine—such as changing its form or formulation—and applies for a new patent.
This attempt to extend patent protection through minor modifications is called “evergreening of…
The easiest way to remember:
Factor → Basic → Market
First ask:
Factors ko kitna mila?
↓
Production activity par tax/subsidy adjust karo
↓
Product par tax/subsidy adjust karo
↓
Market Price
And remember — these are not three different GDPs.
It is the same economic activity valued at different stages.
Imagine you manufacture a shirt.
Now let's see what happens to its value at different stages.
1. Factor Cost — Factors ko kitna mila?
Suppose the production of the shirt generates:
Wages = ₹600
Interest = ₹100
Profit = ₹200
Total = ₹900
This ₹900 is the income going to the factors of production.
So:
Factor Cost = ₹900
Think: “Production se factors ko kitna mila?”
⬇️
2. Basic Price — Producer ko production ke liye …
A very common student confusion is:
“Sir, GDP toh GDP hai… phir Factor Cost, Basic Price aur Market Price alag-alag kya hain?”
The easiest way is to understand it as a chain, rather than memorising three definitions.
PIB is one of the most important sources for CSE preparation. Get a weekly analysis of this trusted government source to strengthen your preparation.
🎥 Watch Now!!!
https://youtu.be/91YXO-zL61A?si=s1TWjK0kP_jtlbAp
Current Affairs by Prithu pinned «UPSC Aspirants — Are You Reading Budget Wrong? Your Budget notes may be complete, but UPSC has moved beyond mere definitions. 🎯 New Video: Why Your Budget Notes Are Useless for UPSC Decode how UPSC is testing Budget–Economy linkages, application, and conceptual…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @saurabhPolity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
UPSC POLITY MCQS PRELIMS PYQ @Upsc_Prelims_Polity_Mcqs · 36,372 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
ECONOMY by VIVEK SINGH @VivekSingh_Economy · 131,446 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Sleepy Classes IAS @SleepyClasses · 83,384 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
INSIGHTS IAS PSIR Channel : Nikhil K Gowda Class and Test Series forum @nikiunited · 19,888 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 October 2026
Anthropology(UPSC)🇮🇳 @anthropology · 39,067 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Dr Neha Rajput AIR 51 UPSC CSE 2023 @drneharajput_ias · 19,411 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 September 2026
Hornbill Forestry 🌱 IFoS 2026 @forestryopt · 32,394 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
KAVACH - GS Foundation 2028 @sunyaiasgs · 28,552 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
UPSC ethics @upsc_ethics_toppers · 35,385 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Level Up IAS (Official Channel) @levelupias · 21,519 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Smriti Shah_UPSC @smriti_shah · 62,743 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Rau's IAS Study Circle (Since 1953) @rausias1953 · 37,911 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
UPSC GS PYQs @Upsc_prelims_Pyq_Mcq · 27,293 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
UPSC Toppers Notes & Study Materials @Upsc_Toppers_Notesss · 89,514 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
🇮🇳 Arjuna IAS @ArjunaIAS · 24,861 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
CSE 2025 marksheet @cse25marks · 31,426 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
IASExam-Congress @IASExamcongress · 38,278 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Atish Mathur Official @csepaper2atish · 118,080 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
VK IAS by Vikas kanukollu (VK) @hinduhighlights · 132,756 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Shubhra Ranjan IAS Study @sriasofficial · 30,820 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Economics an addiction( Dr. Vibhas jha) @vjspeaks · 34,092 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
VK IAS- prelims (UPSC highlights) @upschighlights · 54,475 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Mudit Gupta - UPSC and Beyond..... @muditgupta · 28,381 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
OnlyIAS Nothing Else @onlyiasnothingelse · 203,796 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“saurabhpolity” (@saurabhPolity), 8 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saurabhPolity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.