Untouchability: ➡️ Idea of Untouchability under the Constitution (Article 17) ➡️ Not defined under constitution, enforceable against private citizens ➡️ SC Decisions related to it #Polity Article link 🔗 https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/untouchability-and-the-idea-of-purity/article71415040.ece/amp/

Channel
IASEC-Prelims Exclusive
@iasecprelims
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,901subscribers
-77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002020701048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iasecprelims |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iasecprelims |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 10,901 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 10,909 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 10,908 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 10,909 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 10,917 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:09 | 10,919 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:03 | 10,931 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 10,936 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 10,938 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 10,939 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 10,941 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 10,944 | +11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 10,933 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 10,938 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 10,933 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 10,940 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 10,947 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 10,955 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 10,954 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 10,956 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.42%
- avg views ÷ 10,901 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 918
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (21 May 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,671 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Distinguished Jurist under the Constitution (Article 124(3)) #Polity Article link 🔗 https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/article-124-3-distinguished-jurist-supreme-court-judge-10857738/
Peptides were recently in news #SnT Article link🔗 …
Latest Ramon Magsaysay award winners: 1.Called as Asia's Nobel named after Philippine president to honor selfless service to people across Asia 2. Winners : Tommy Koh (Singapore), Runa Khan (Bangladesh) and Bo Kyi (Myanmar) Important for upcoming PCS exams #misc
India's First Hydrogen Train #GS3 #SnT Article link 🔗 https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/india-first-hydrogen-train-explained-how-it-works-10782092/lite/
@shunyashashvata MiniAW squad is open for subscription now. Fees: ₹3000/- ₹2500/- (till 1st July) UPI: payiasexamcongress@okicici Features: 10Mini Tests and 1+4 FLTs Solution Booklets Evaluation within 12hrs Option for Video Evaluation (only one video evaluation is free) @iasexamcongress
Article on Anti Defection Law: ➡️ Recently many cases have taken place -> Split in TMC , AAP ➡️ Recommendations of Diff Committees , Impact SC Judgements. Article link 🔗 https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/what-does-tenth-schedule-provide-on-party-mergers/article71108799.ece #GS2 #Polity
@iasexamcongress is running two courses for Mains 2026 CRUX (Current Affairs module) for Mains-2026 starts in full swing from tomorrow onwards. Subscribe at a discounted price of ₹3500/- by 20th June. Mini Answer Writing (MiniAW) 2026 to be launched on 25th June. A total of 15 tests. 10 Mini Tests and 1 Essay FLT and 4 GS FLTs will be included in this. Details to be out soon. @Shunyashashvata
https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/what-is-pyroprocessing/article71072743.ece #SnT
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-do-indian-cities-get-polluted-in-summer-explained/article71048303.ece
Q. Ashtapradhan was a council of ministers :
- In Gupta Administration15%
- In the Chola Administration5%
- In the Vijaynagar Administration16%
- In the Maratha Administration64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q
- A4%
- B11%
- C76%
- D9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @iasecprelims. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Q. Ashtapradhan was a council of ministers :
- In Gupta Administration15%
- In the Chola Administration5%
- In the Vijaynagar Administration16%
- In the Maratha Administration64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q
- A4%
- B11%
- C76%
- D9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q.The atmosphere is heated more by incoming solar radiation than by terrestrial radiation ?
- True7%
- False93%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q
- A35%
- B11%
- C43%
- D11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@IASExamcongress · 38,711
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@deepuksukumar · 22,777
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
@SOMP_Essay · 27,554
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
@vjspeaks · 33,999
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
@DrNeha_anthropology · 24,943
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 September 2026
@MODERN_HISTORY_NOTES_MINDMAPS · 29,469
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
@upscwithkawalbaweja · 25,885
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
@csp20info · 51,983
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
@UnderStandUPSC · 114,370
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@VivekSingh_Economy · 132,275
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
@SarrthiMentorship · 71,629
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@saurabhPolity · 23,332
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
@ArjunaIAS · 25,254
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
@StudySmartIASPCS · 30,646
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@bhuvanstudyiq · 35,576
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
@iascorridor · 25,910
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION · 24,873
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
@rausias1953 · 38,682
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@iaspcspathshala · 188,532
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@upsc_prelims_tests · 22,298
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 21 September 2026
@csepaper2atish · 116,782
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@UPSCPrelimsWithNeelesh · 40,480
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
@essaykaise1 · 23,234
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
@PLAtforM_IAS · 35,020
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IASEC-Prelims Exclusive” (@iasecprelims), 10,901 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iasecprelims.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.