Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Divyanshu Nigam IAS Resources/Tips

Channel

Divyanshu Nigam IAS Resources/Tips

@white_spade44

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,282subscribers

-103 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001253135411
TypeChannel
Username@white_spade44
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/white_spade44

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,28221,38521,333.57 August 2026 — 21,385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,383 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,382 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,379 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,370 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,372 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,369 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,367 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,370 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,361 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,351 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,347 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,335 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,337 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,336 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,334 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,324 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,322 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,324 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,327 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,322 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,315 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,314 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,304 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,298 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,291 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,289 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,282 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 43 days, net -103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,267–21,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:5621,282-7
16 Sept 2026, 17:3721,289-2
14 Sept 2026, 21:0021,291-7
13 Sept 2026, 04:5621,298-6
11 Sept 2026, 03:5421,304-10
8 Sept 2026, 08:2221,314-1
5 Sept 2026, 06:1721,315-7
3 Sept 2026, 14:1521,322-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:0721,327+3
31 Aug 2026, 07:3821,324+2
30 Aug 2026, 04:5621,322-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:3721,324-10
28 Aug 2026, 03:3821,334-2
26 Aug 2026, 03:3321,336-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:0821,337+2
23 Aug 2026, 21:0421,335-12
19 Aug 2026, 20:0221,347-4
18 Aug 2026, 18:0321,351-10
17 Aug 2026, 19:1521,361-9
16 Aug 2026, 16:4721,370first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 May 2026, 07:31 UTC≈11,200 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

How was the paper guys?

  1. Easy5%
  2. Moderate8%
  3. Tough25%
  4. Very tough46%
  5. Didn't attempt19%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Jun 2025, 10:13 UTC≈35,600 viewsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

10 Jun 2025, 10:13 UTC≈33,400 viewsread 3 September 2026

Hello Guys! Hope all of you are doing well. Mains is coming up and many of you have been requesting for the Evernotes link to my Geology Notes, which is generally not available in the market. Here I am sharing a pdf which has links to many of my online notes on Geology. There are not complete notes as a majority of the notes were in form of physical registers and those cannot be scanned. I am sharing whatever can be

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

16 Jun 2024, 12:42 UTC≈56,900 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

How was the Csat paper guy?

  1. Easy18%
  2. Moderate38%
  3. Slightly tough19%
  4. Very tough7%
  5. Didn't attempt this year17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

16 Jun 2024, 12:41 UTC≈51,000 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

How was the GS paper guys?

  1. Easy14%
  2. Moderate44%
  3. Slightly tough18%
  4. Very tough6%
  5. Didn't attempt this year18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

13 Jun 2023, 15:44 UTC≈70,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

A good group where you can get your answers evaluated and receive important feedback. This is an initiative of my friend Sachin Yadav, IPS. https://t.me/WE_ASSIST

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

24 May 2023, 16:30 UTC≈71,800 viewsread 3 September 2026

Congratulations to everyone who got selected !! Welcome aboard! 😃🥂

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

1 Apr 2023, 08:44 UTC≈70,800 viewsread 3 September 2026

Thanks a lot for joining and due to the maximum size of 100 at a time... Many of your requests were declined... It has nothing to do with me 'hating' late comers ... As someone rightly said... Even I was 3 minutes late 😂 Hope this session was helpful to some of you. Nandri D.

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

1 Apr 2023, 07:03 UTC≈58,600 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://meet.google.com/ndv-eqyb-ved

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

1 Apr 2023, 05:45 UTC≈51,600 viewsread 3 September 2026

And it's not an April's Fool prank 😂

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

1 Apr 2023, 05:43 UTC≈49,400 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Google Meet Session today at 1230

  1. Yes73%
  2. No27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

23 Mar 2023, 17:22 UTC≈53,900 viewsread 3 September 2026

Sorry got some work today. Have to cancel it. Will conduct it soon.

Signed Divyanshu Nigam

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @white_spade44. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 May 2026, 07:31 UTCAnonymous Poll4,050 voters approx.

How was the paper guys?

  1. Easy5%
  2. Moderate8%
  3. Tough25%
  4. Very tough46%
  5. Didn't attempt19%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jun 2024, 12:42 UTCAnonymous Poll7,270 voters approx.

How was the Csat paper guy?

  1. Easy18%
  2. Moderate38%
  3. Slightly tough19%
  4. Very tough7%
  5. Didn't attempt this year17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Jun 2024, 12:41 UTCAnonymous Poll6,310 voters approx.

How was the GS paper guys?

  1. Easy14%
  2. Moderate44%
  3. Slightly tough18%
  4. Very tough6%
  5. Didn't attempt this year18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Apr 2023, 05:43 UTCAnonymous Poll1,630 voters approx.

Google Meet Session today at 1230

  1. Yes73%
  2. No27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Dec 2022, 04:55 UTCAnonymous Poll1,680 voters approx.

One interactive session today? 1130 am

  1. Yes74%
  2. No26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2022 to 24 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Shreyans Kumat Notes and Strategy UPSC
@shreyansias · 25,998
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 September 2026
Dr Neha Goyal, IDAS
@DrNeha_anthropology · 24,943
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Divyanshu Nigam IAS Resources/Tips” (@white_spade44), 21,282 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/white_spade44.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.