Official group of Bhuvan A Jha Sir - renowned faculty of Geography optional & General Studies with Study IQ IAS.
Use code BALIVE for maximum discount & join his batches when you sign up on the Study IQ Website.
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net +177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,289–35,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 09:15
35,493
+5
2 Sept 2026, 06:05
35,488
-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:45
35,498
+9
31 Aug 2026, 07:28
35,489
+2
30 Aug 2026, 07:47
35,487
+4
29 Aug 2026, 09:13
35,483
+6
28 Aug 2026, 09:58
35,477
+38
27 Aug 2026, 09:35
35,439
+107
26 Aug 2026, 08:25
35,332
-22
25 Aug 2026, 04:45
35,354
-3
24 Aug 2026, 03:46
35,357
+4
22 Aug 2026, 08:08
35,353
-13
20 Aug 2026, 21:17
35,366
+10
19 Aug 2026, 20:33
35,356
-10
18 Aug 2026, 21:35
35,366
+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:34
35,365
-8
16 Aug 2026, 20:14
35,373
-4
15 Aug 2026, 06:46
35,377
-2
14 Aug 2026, 00:58
35,379
+3
12 Aug 2026, 21:54
35,376
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 35,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,740
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.573%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
54 (2 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
170,570
Reactions total
977
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈467
Videos
≈17
Links
≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,640 reactions across 54 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,515
92.4%
👍
100
6.10%
👏
11
0.671%
😍
8
0.488%
🙏
6
0.366%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/live/j4FhpOpsU7M?si=j9h4NNs7BHoYDW8R
Friends,
The 2015 Nepal Earthquake has lessons for 2026 Nepal Flash Floods - that, humanitarian disasters inevitably follow natural disasters.
Watch the 5 biggest challenges for Nepal in the days to come 👆
StudyIQ's Mains Residential Program culminates today.
These set of students will always have a special place in my heart. I pray for their success this year.
May you grow from strength to strength ❤️
Friends,
Since many of you want to read PIB articles (and rightly so!), here are two sections you must read:
PIB YEAR END REVIEW - https://www.pib.gov.in/EventDetail.aspx?ID=1229®=3&lang=1
PIB Backgrounders (Extremely well drafted case studies) https://www.pib.gov.in/ViewBackgrounder.aspx?MenuId=51®=3&lang=1
Those appearing in 2027 must also read PIB year end review 2026, which will be released in December …
Friends,
To celebrate the auspicious festival of Rakhi, StudyIQ is offering a 60% discount on all General Studies batches with the discount coupon code BALIVE on the StudyIQ website/app.
Admissions are open for the UPSC GS 2027 batch: https://www.studyiq.com/course-detail/upsc-ias-live-gs-p2i-foundation-2027-pratigya-august-evening-batch-2
Admissions are open for the UPSC GS 2028 batch: https://www.studyiq.com/cou…
https://www.youtube.com/live/O9YNOcia5wc?si=0zcMJeSjE-Kru-Z6
Friends,
Bhote Koshi river of Nepal was in the news today due to a major flash flood. Loss of life & property is already being reported. Bihar is on alert.
Watch the discussion above 👆
https://www.youtube.com/live/E-EVP4n0xLQ?si=2lfUyHIXOTbBcYmw
Do you want to discuss about your preparation? Or answer writing? Question solving? Or even GTA leaks?
Join me on Wednesday evening at 9pm for a LIVE Ask Me Anything (AMA) session.
Leave your questions and messages in the comment box below and it will be taken up.
See you at 9 pm. ❤️
https://www.youtube.com/live/I2y_34Prvis?si=tEn8nHp1fQxKD1xX
Friends,
UPSC Mains 2026 had some very specific learnings for students appearing in 2027 and 2028.
Join me LIVE 👆
https://www.youtube.com/live/ngeWzsU1OGo?si=9ODgg9yATPofWF2w
Friends,
Himachal Pradesh has seen 8% rainfall deficit till now. Himachal Pradesh has also seen more than 200 dead and losses of 1000 crore+ due to Monsoons.
Gurugram has seen near normal rainfall but is submerged under water.
How does one reconcile these two facts? How should we balance rapid infra development with disaster resilience?
Watch the discu…
❤12👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @bhuvanstudyiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bhuvanstudyiq edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
With reference to the DART mission, which one of the following statements is correct?
Share & Join @bhuvanstudyiq
It destroyed a potentially Earth-impacting asteroid by using a nuclear explosive device.17%
It demonstrated the kinetic-impact technique by deliberately striking asteroid moonlet Dimorphos.44%
It collected material from Dimorphos and returned the samples to Earth.21%
It changed the orbit of the Didymos sufficiently to remove an immediate threat to Earth.18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CSE with Sainil Nagare (History) @csewithsainilnagare · 75,970 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
Shashank Tyagi @shashanktyagi4u · 62,195 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Prelims COMPLETE @Prelims_Convertias · 49,195 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
Ankit Agrawal Official @ankitagrawalofficial · 53,125 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
CSLIVE Group_UPSC @cslivegroup · 55,391 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Prashant Tiwari @UPSCwithPrashant · 182,831 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
Dr Vipan Goyal StudyIQ @DrVipanGoyal · 133,057 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
StudyIQ Education @Studyiqeducation · 363,902 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Shashank Sajwan @iasips_mentor · 85,376 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Tathastu ICS Official Channel @tathastubyTanuJain · 44,907 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
TARGET UPSC by Dr.Sudarshan Lodha (AIR 571 ) @target30upsc · 73,860 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bhuvan Jha Study IQ” (@bhuvanstudyiq), 35,493 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bhuvanstudyiq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.