Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -362. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,830–26,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:36
25,885
-13
17 Sept 2026, 05:18
25,898
-7
15 Sept 2026, 02:59
25,905
-19
13 Sept 2026, 12:42
25,924
-10
11 Sept 2026, 16:01
25,934
-31
9 Sept 2026, 04:35
25,965
-33
5 Sept 2026, 18:17
25,998
-14
3 Sept 2026, 16:38
26,012
-6
2 Sept 2026, 11:04
26,018
-7
1 Sept 2026, 10:59
26,025
-24
31 Aug 2026, 13:13
26,049
-11
30 Aug 2026, 11:36
26,060
-3
29 Aug 2026, 10:05
26,063
-7
28 Aug 2026, 06:44
26,070
-7
27 Aug 2026, 03:55
26,077
-7
26 Aug 2026, 05:42
26,084
-3
25 Aug 2026, 09:12
26,087
-3
24 Aug 2026, 09:57
26,090
-17
22 Aug 2026, 18:04
26,107
-19
21 Aug 2026, 12:03
26,126
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.6%
avg views ÷ 25,885 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
32 (22 May 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
94,340
Reactions total
2,526
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
345
Videos
160
Links
210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 51s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,452 reactions across 31 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,458
82.6%
👍
425
3.71%
😭
309
2.70%
🤣
275
2.40%
🔥
234
2.04%
💯
203
1.77%
👏
133
1.16%
🫡
89
0.777%
🙏
81
0.707%
😁
76
0.664%
❤🔥
44
0.384%
🥰
24
0.21%
🎉
23
0.201%
😢
16
0.14%
🗿
15
0.131%
🤝
10
0.087%
👎
9
0.079%
🏆
5
0.044%
💋
4
0.035%
💔
4
0.035%
7 further kinds
15
0.131%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,452 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If I may…
I have always approached life with a certain openness.
Perhaps that comes from my upbringing. I grew up with the warmth of not just a household, but an entire neighbourhood — where you could walk into almost any home and be welcomed, loved and, most importantly, fed.
I was equally fortunate with my teachers. Many of them went beyond their subjects, trying to shape us for life beyond the classroom. I supp…
Ethics for UPSC - How ?
“How did you prepare Ethics for Mains?” has probably been one of the most frequently asked questions about my Mains preparation.
To be honest, I initially tried studying notes and referring to Ethics course videos of some of the well-known teachers in the market.
But in most teaching methods, I somehow found the soul of the subject missing.
At times, the focus seemed to be less on showing …
There is no correct way.
The CSE examination is unlike many other exams that can be cleared through a fixed set of rules, patterns, templates, or guidelines.
Every once in a while, the pattern evolves. And those caught in that turbulence feel the pain and agony of having prepared for an examination that suddenly seems to have changed its rules.
Teaching pedagogy and narratives shift accordingly. The 2026 Prelims, …
Between One Chapter and the Next.
I feel immensely blessed, and my mind is full of gratitude for the overwhelming support extended by you all.
I have read each suggestion, and every piece of advice has helped me gain greater clarity about the path ahead.
I was also counselled by my mother to enjoy this phase of life — to focus on my health, walk further on the spiritual path - attend Vipassana again, read more boo…
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Your opinion matters…
Over the last few days, while thinking about what the next chapter of my teaching journey should look like, one idea has stayed with me.
For years, I have taught within institutions. That journey gave me a lot, but institutional setups naturally come with their own priorities, structures and limitations.
I have increasingly felt the desire to teach with greater independence — where academic q…
Happy Teacher’s Day
My head bows to the teachers who shaped me, and my heart is filled with gratitude for the students who valued and supported me.
Destiny made me a teacher, but the lessons I learned along the way—and your unwavering support—have sustained me throughout this journey.
Thank you so much. I shall always strive to uphold and propagate the values that matter not merely for succeeding in a competition,…
UPSC with Kawal Baweja pinned «And the mountain has been scaled. These 10 days have been challenging, with my performance ranging from below average to good across different papers. Essay went well. I wrote on “A Grateful Mind…” and “Shelving Hard Decisions…” Started first essay with…»
And the mountain has been scaled.
These 10 days have been challenging, with my performance ranging from below average to good across different papers.
Essay went well. I wrote on “A Grateful Mind…” and “Shelving Hard Decisions…”
Started first essay with these lines:
All have minds,
Many have potential,
Few have capabilities,
Rare are grateful.
Across the GS papers, I struggled a little with completing the papers…
The preparation journey concludes.
It has been a long road — full of highs, lows, perseverance, and some guilt over time wasted. It is nowhere near what I had planned, but that phase is over now.
What remains is execution.
All the best to everyone writing Mains. One question at a time, one paper at a time — that is all it will take to cross this mountain.
I hope we see this journey as an experience that shapes us…
“I am afraid. How do I manage it?”
This has perhaps been the most recurrent concern I have heard from students preparing for Mains 2026 over the last few days.
So many subjects. So much depth. Constant revision. Answer-writing practice. And despite doing all of it, there are days when you begin doubting your knowledge, preparation and ability.
The truth is that almost everyone who seriously walks this path experie…
❤326❤🔥21👍7💯5👏3🔥3🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @upscwithkawalbaweja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
UPSC Sutra With Ravi Kapoor Ex IRS @becoming_ias_super_simplified · 39,188 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Economics with Nanki @economicswithnanki · 21,706 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
UPSC PRELIMS Quiz @UPSC_Quiz_PRELIMS · 194,046 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
CSLIVE Group_UPSC @cslivegroup · 55,743 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC with Kawal Baweja” (@upscwithkawalbaweja), 25,885 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upscwithkawalbaweja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.