Channel
@g0uravs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,626subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001299902380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @g0uravs |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/g0uravs |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 7,626 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 7,625 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 7,634 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 7,646 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 7,634 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 7,628 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 7,626 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 7,628 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 7,632 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 7,637 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
489 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 296 | 60.5% | |
| 🔥 | 100 | 20.4% | |
| 🤯 | 46 | 9.41% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 4.50% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.04% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.64% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In case of IFS optionals, PYQs are not easily available. Here is one FREE source you can use https://t.me/IndianForestServices/349 PYQs have been segregated micro-topic wise and it's FREE. :)
❤7
The thrill of Prelims! Tomorrow is the day. The day of CSE 26 prelims exam. The day you'll face 100 new and thrilling questions Thrilling is not something you usually associate with an exam. However, this exam is different. Each question invokes a mixed feelings of excitement, fear and thrill. One option you would be able to eliminate easily, another option by some intuition. The real suspense appears in last 2 opt…
❤80🔥3🥰2🤯1😁1
Reminder Last date to apply for RBI Grade B.
❤7
78+ total selections out of 140 in the Indian Forest Service 2025! Having personally benefitted from the group myself, I couldn't feel more proud to see what the community has grown into today. I am sure the selections must be over 100, with many lazy ones who don't vote. :P Congratulations to all the selected candidates. The best is yet to come! Welcome to the All India Service league! ❤️ IFoS 2026 aspirants ca…
❤24
IFoS 2025 Final Result Congratulations to all the selected candidates @IndianForestServices
❤13
Our Take on RBI Grade B 2025 The RBI Grade B notification is out (Click Here). Phase 1 is scheduled for June 13 and Phase 2 in the last week of July. The big question: Only 40 seats this year. Is it still worth it? For context, RBI used to release 300+ vacancies just two to three years ago. So yes, the competition has gotten sharper. But here is our honest take. If you are a UPSC Prelims aspirant: Do not let RBI…
❤32👍5🥰2
Aspirants were asking Cadre analysis and InsiderVsOutsoder for IFS Interview and DAF. As this data is for IAS cadres, it might not be very useful. Due to a little busy schedule we didn't get time to analyse IFS cadres. But I strongly recommend, taking inspiration and idea from this and doing analysis for IFS as well. Access code will be shared on IFS Interview Guidance Group ———— (Cadres + DAF) X (AI+Algo) Analys…
❤6👏4🤯2
CSE 2025 result is expected today! This reminds me of the day when my CSE result was declared. I clearly remember the day. It was May 23, 2023. The next prelims was hardly 5 days away. Given my track record of multiple failures in Prelims, a rational me should have been studying. But as often seen in humans, emotions overpower logic, and I was anxiously scrolling through telegram chats, following "insiders," and …
❤59👏3
IFS 2025 Mains Result! Congratulations! Selected candidates can join the Interview Guidance Group - https://t.me/+eBxvzowx2QoyMDY1 @PriyanshaIAS
❤8
CSE/IFoS Notification 2026 Major Changes! - Restrictions on selected candidates - Only one more attempt is allowed, that too only in the next 2 exam cycles. - Drastic Reduction in number of Vancancies for IFoS - from 155 to just 80. Expect IFoS Cutoff = CSE Cutoff + 20 - No restriction on IFoS candidates in appearing in CSE/IFoS. They can appear even for cadre change in IFoS. @acadsCSE @IndianForestServices
🤯19❤12🔥7👍1
Decoding Modern History: Mastering the Concepts (5/n) While Part A (Factual Data) helps you answer direct match-the-following questions, Part B (Concepts) is crucial for the statement-based questions with a larger focus on the "Who, Where, and Why." Part B: The Conceptual Framework Strategy: Read these chapters to build a narrative. Focus on cause-and-effect relationships rather than isolated facts. 1. Mass Moveme…
❤17🔥5👍1
New Cadre Policy in one line If you are not getting Insider seats then your cadre allocation is entirely random, based on alphabetical order!! Reinforcing the spirit of All India Services 🇮🇳 @g0uravs P.S. Glad that no more cadre hacks are applicable now, except one :)
🔥85😁21🤯19🥰4❤3👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @g0uravs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gouravs.com” (@g0uravs), 7,626 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/g0uravs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.