Starting today! Text at @csetopper_helpline to reserve your seat.
❤3

Channel
@ABCD_of_UPSC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,700subscribers
-1,783 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001568848097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ABCD_of_UPSC |
| Description | This channel is an initiative of CSE Topper. Now bringing to you a Free Mapping Series for Prelims. 🏅In Prelims 2025 8 out of 14 Questions of mapping were from this series. 🏅In Prelims 2024 13/15 Questions were solvable based on that year’s series |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ABCD_of_UPSC |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:06 | 60,700 | -14 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:45 | 60,714 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:39 | 60,724 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 60,732 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 60,743 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 60,760 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 60,774 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 60,792 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 60,804 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 60,825 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 60,840 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 60,842 | -31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 60,873 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 60,890 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 60,903 | -30 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 60,933 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 60,948 | -15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:50 | 60,963 | -15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 60,978 | -28 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 61,006 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (23 June 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 22,170 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 11:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
711 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 665 | 93.5% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 1.97% | |
| 🏆 | 12 | 1.69% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 1.41% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.844% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 0.422% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.141% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 711 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Starting today! Text at @csetopper_helpline to reserve your seat.
❤3
Ethics MIG-27 Available now ✅Writing starts from 22nd October Discounts available only for first 50 seats A program helping a total of 71 rankers in CSE 2025, 70 rankers in 2024 and 51 rankers in CSE 2023. Evaluation done by a team of select few toppers of the subject. Click here to check AIR-15- Simrandeep Kaur’s MIG Copy Click here to check AIR-37 Sakshi Jain’s MIG-25 copy Click here to check AIR-38, Deepan…
❤26🏆1👌1
Click here for High Yield Notes for APFC
❤8🏆2👌1
ABCD of UPSC by Vikas Dhayal pinned a photo
For UPPSC Prelims-2026 Comprehensive Coverage of Current Affairs through 750 High Yield Questions and to the point solutions. You can enrol by texting at @csetopper_helpline
❤16🏆1
Pro Tip For those who have written Mains-26 and finding it difficult to decide how to go ahead from here As of today we can expect the Mains results to be out by around 10th November. That leaves about 50 days before the results are out, perhaps the most difficult period to pass. Watching movies, travelling, spending time with family and friends may not feel as exciting as before. Being productive also will be …
❤45
PYQ Model answers 2021-2025 by Akash Kumar(Highest marks in PSIR-CSE’25) Click here to refer to Akash Kumar’s PSIR MIG copies Text at @csetopper_helpline to reserve your seat in PSIR MIG-27.
❤12
GS-2 Notes of CSE Topper Ankit Agarwal Ankit Scored 110+ in GS-2 back to back in three consecutive Mains attempts. Mains Improvement Group(MIG-27) for GS-2 and 3 is available now. There were 71 Rankers in CSE 2025, 70 rankers in CSE 2024 from among past our students. Text at @csetopper_helpline to reserve your seat in MIG-27
❤16
Starts tomorrow at 9 AM
❤3
MIG-27 for GS-2,3 starts on 21st September More toppers vis a number of takers than any other course. 🏅141 CSE Rankers in past two years. A complete answer writing module for GS-2,3. Text at @csetopper_helpline to reserve your seat in MIG- GS-2,3.
❤12
GS-3 Note Taking Guide (Few sentences, data, facts, diagrams, committee reports on each point mentioned) 3–4 Pager Notes 1. Monetary-Fiscal Policy Link, FRBM Act, Budget targets, methods of budgeting 2. Inclusive Growth – JAM Trinity, DBT, Financial inclusion, MGNREGA 3. Agriculture– MSP system, APMC reforms, WTO impact, Contract farming challenges 4. Land Reforms – ceiling laws, tenancy reforms, Model Land Leasi…
❤30👍1
Early Bird Discount available till midnight tomorrow for MIG-27 for GS-2,3. More toppers vis a number of takers than any other course. 🏅141 CSE Rankers in past two years. A complete answer writing module for GS-2,3. Text at @csetopper_helpline to reserve your seat in MIG- GS-2,3.
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @ABCD_of_UPSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @ABCD_of_UPSC as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 127 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ABCD of UPSC by Vikas Dhayal” (@ABCD_of_UPSC), 60,700 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ABCD_of_UPSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.