Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jonathan Sturel

Channel

Jonathan Sturel

@JonathanSturel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,166subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193809719
TypeChannel
Username@JonathanSturel
Created10 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JonathanSturel

Growth

3,1663,2073,186.57 August 2026 — 3,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,207 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,202 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,200 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,201 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,200 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,187 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,181 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,175 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,174 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,173 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,166 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,160–3,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 21:213,166-7
3 Sept 2026, 14:563,173-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:363,174-1
28 Aug 2026, 13:033,175-6
25 Aug 2026, 22:453,181-6
22 Aug 2026, 20:173,187-13
19 Aug 2026, 11:063,200-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:163,201+1
13 Aug 2026, 15:363,200-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:113,202-5
7 Aug 2026, 22:513,207no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:463,207first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

980 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍37438.2%
😁25726.2%
😢13113.4%
12913.2%
👏798.06%
😱101.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 980 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC371 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Qui se souvient de La délégation des siècles ? 😥

😢47😁7

5 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC801 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

À partir du 18 août, le site Internet de La délégation des siècles ne sera plus disponible. Il vous reste moins de deux semaines pour acquérir un ou plusieurs livres, après il sera trop tard. Merci à tous ceux qui ont participé à l'aventure ! C'était bien. https://www.ladelegationdessiecles.fr/

😢35

24 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,340 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Si vous rencontriez Tintin (il faut faire preuve d'imagination), vous adresseriez-vous à lui en le tutoyant ou en le vouvoyant spontanément ?

  1. Spontanément, vouvoiement.77%
  2. Spontanément, tutoiement.23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁9👍4👏1

24 Jul 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,190 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Sentinelle_InvisiblePhoto

« Les individus, dans la société moderne, sont chaque jour plus semblables les uns aux autres et chaque jour plus étrangers les uns aux autres. Des monades identiques qui s’affrontent dans un individualisme féroce. » Nicolás Gómez Dávila 🖼 On the Riviera, John Lavery (1856-1941) @Sentinelle_Invisible

👍3210😱1

19 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,950 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

" Y sont tous fronçais"

😁58😢1510😱6👍3

19 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,460 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Des_Paluches_Et_Des_Bouquins

https://youtu.be/t-NX0_XlnRY?is=GSotGtd6xiRvBOpZ

9

18 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC≈1,230 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Combien de personnes étaient concernées par le mariage homosexuel ? Les homosexuels sont une minorité et à l'intérieur de cette minorité ceux qui aspiraient au mariage constituaient eux-mêmes une minorité dans la minorité. Combien de personnes seront concernées par l'euthanasie ? Très peu évidemment. Chaque fois c'est le même scénario : on prend un sujet qui concerne un nombre anecdotique d'individus, on fait monte

👍52👏1410😁4

16 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,080 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Qui se souvient de l'équipe de France de foot ?

😁627😢4👍1👏1

15 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,410 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ils se disent toujours fiers des idées qu'ils portent mais prennent systématiquement soin de les renommer de manière à les faire passer plus facilement. Le mariage homosexuel était devenu «le mariage pour tous». L'euthanasie est devenue «loi sur la fin de vie». Chaque fois ils trouvent un joli petit sobriquet tout innocent, tout bienveillant, tout passe-partout, tout démago pour faire passer des attentats contre l

👍6515👏8

14 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,440 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Des_Paluches_Et_Des_BouquinsPhoto

Pour nos amis parisiens qui aiment chiner de beaux livres anciens, je ne peux que recommander le bouquiniste Arnaud, installé en face du 27 quai des Grands-Augustins (75006 Paris). Un fond consacré à Léon Bloy, Henri Béraud, Drieu La Rochelle, Michel de Saint-Pierre, Maurice Barrès, Lucien Rebatet, Maurice Bedel, Maurice Bardèche, René Benjamin, Pierre Gaxotte, ainsi que d'anciennes plaquettes de l'Action française

👍2617

13 Jul 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,470 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Je suis un citoyen français rassuré ! Moins d'un mois après le massacre de Louis, l'ensemble de la classe médiatique et politique continue de réagir ! Nos élus, nos dirigeants, nos journalistes ont tous condamné les propos d'une sénatrice paraguayenne totalement inconnue qui a dit des choses très très méchantes à l'autre bout du monde, puis ils ont condamné le terrible dérapage raciste d'un ancien ministre espagnol

👏40👍26😢185😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JonathanSturel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTCAnonymous Poll379 voters

Si vous rencontriez Tintin (il faut faire preuve d'imagination), vous adresseriez-vous à lui en le tutoyant ou en le vouvoyant spontanément ?

  1. Spontanément, vouvoiement.77%
  2. Spontanément, tutoiement.23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jonathan Sturel” (@JonathanSturel), 3,166 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JonathanSturel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.