Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔴 Damien Rieu

Channel

🔴 Damien Rieu

@Damienrieu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

21,452subscribers

-261 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001214265894
TypeChannel
Username@Damienrieu
Created8 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Damienrieu

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,45221,71321,582.56 August 2026 — 21,713 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,707 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,693 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,689 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,681 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,676 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,656 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,663 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,653 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,637 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,635 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,631 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,628 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,616 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,608 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,599 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,587 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,584 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,580 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,576 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,563 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,561 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,559 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,553 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,544 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,548 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,545 subscribers6 September 2026 — 21,528 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,513 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,505 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,494 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,485 subscribers17 September 2026 — 21,470 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,452 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,413–21,752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:5421,452-18
17 Sept 2026, 05:0021,470-15
15 Sept 2026, 03:3821,485-9
13 Sept 2026, 15:5721,494-11
11 Sept 2026, 21:5821,505-8
9 Sept 2026, 12:1721,513-15
6 Sept 2026, 04:2121,528-17
3 Sept 2026, 23:4121,545-3
2 Sept 2026, 15:0821,548+4
1 Sept 2026, 11:2821,544-9
31 Aug 2026, 09:4121,553-6
30 Aug 2026, 10:0821,559-2
29 Aug 2026, 06:4421,561-2
28 Aug 2026, 10:0421,563-13
27 Aug 2026, 09:1621,576-4
26 Aug 2026, 09:3221,580-4
25 Aug 2026, 10:3821,584-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:1421,587-12
22 Aug 2026, 13:3521,599-9
21 Aug 2026, 05:5321,608first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 21,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,600
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held73 (30 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total124,250
Reactions total5,188
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 31s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,068 reactions across 65 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏3,91430.0%
3,14524.1%
🔥3,05123.3%
😱2,95822.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,620 views91 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

Comment le Japon éradique l’immigration clandestine. (Le Figaro)

53👏29🔥9

3 Sept 2026, 05:01 UTC≈2,340 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

🇪🇸 Le rapport de la police espagnole sur l’attaque migratoire de Ceuta

🔥767👏2

2 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTC≈3,790 views477 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

L’Autriche prépare une INTERDICTION constitutionnelle de « l’islam politique », jugé « incompatible avec la démocratie et les valeurs occidentales » par le chancelier Christian Stocker. « Je ne veux pas que nos enfants et nos petits-enfants grandissent dans un État islamique », affirme-t-il. Le chancelier dénonce notamment l’influence de certains prédicateurs et prévient : « Il ne peut être permis qu’un prédicateur

311👏153🔥11😱2

2 Sept 2026, 05:12 UTC≈3,470 views138 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

94👏34🔥7😱3

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,290 views369 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Je condamne fermement.

👏24886🔥31😱4

1 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈4,230 views316 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇨🇭 Les Suisses ne s’embarrassent pas avec le politiquement correct. Il s’agit de La Tribune de Genève, l’équivalent du Parisien.

189👏103🔥24

31 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈4,310 views176 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😱132🔥377

31 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈4,380 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥51😱26👏21

30 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈4,670 views136 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Elle m’a répondu. Pas contente. https://x.com/wassilameddas/status/2094043215322116414?s=46

🔥97👏219😱9

30 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈4,950 views223 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Femme de Pigasse. Le commentaire est piquant

😱136🔥709👏8

28 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈5,400 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Positionnement politique des IA.

🔥91😱2813

28 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈5,060 views131 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Jour historique pour la robotique : le premier robot domestique de masse est lancé (par des Français) pour 400$ : Microduck. Un minuscule bipède open-source de 25 cm avec 15 actionneurs et bourré de capteurs (caméra, haut-parleur, LiDAR, NFC, bluetooth, wifi, etc.) que vous entraînez vous-même avec l'apprentissage par renforcement. Il est également jouable dès la sortie de la boîte avec plus d'une demi-douzaine de

🔥65👏3118😱17

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @Damienrieu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Damienrieu edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⬛️La Zone Tv🟥Lazone interdite la zone interdite
@lazoneinterdite_off · 36,326
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 1 September 2026
SNP-INTEL
@snp_intel · 104,535
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
La Nouvelle France 🇫🇷
@la_nouvelle_france · 24,655
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
Neodia
@neodia · 48,385
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Les Patriotes 🇫🇷
@les_patriotes · 23,673
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q29018357 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelDamien Rieu
DescriptionFrench political activist
X / Twitter@DamienRieu
Official sitehttps://damienrieu.fr/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔴 Damien Rieu” (@Damienrieu), 21,452 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Damienrieu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.