POV : tu fais un cadeau à tes potes de droite
🔥27👌9😁4

Channel
@bonnedroite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,981subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001487459223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bonnedroite |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bonnedroite |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 6,981 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 6,988 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 6,997 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 6,995 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 6,993 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 6,986 | +6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 6,980 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 6,984 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 6,983 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (26 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,840 |
| Reactions total | 1,976 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,595 reactions across 35 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 868 | 24.1% | |
| 👍 | 679 | 18.9% | |
| 🤣 | 589 | 16.4% | |
| 💯 | 294 | 8.18% | |
| 👏 | 278 | 7.73% | |
| 🔥 | 193 | 5.37% | |
| 😁 | 149 | 4.14% | |
| 🤡 | 136 | 3.78% | |
| 👌 | 112 | 3.12% | |
| ❤🔥 | 61 | 1.70% | |
| 😍 | 55 | 1.53% | |
| 🍾 | 45 | 1.25% | |
| 🙊 | 20 | 0.556% | |
| 🤮 | 19 | 0.529% | |
| 🫡 | 16 | 0.445% | |
| 🖕 | 15 | 0.417% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 0.389% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 0.306% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 0.25% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 0.223% | |
| 6 further kinds | 24 | 0.668% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,863 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bonnedroite. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
POV : tu fais un cadeau à tes potes de droite
🔥27👌9😁4
« Impossible d'arrêter l'immigration » ? Mais ce sont littéralement juste des bouts de papier. Sarah Knafo 26 novembre 2025
👍68👏23❤5🤔1
64% des Français estiment qu'il y a trop d'immigrés extra-européens sur notre sol. Manifestement, sur France Inter, vous faites partie de la minorité qui pense le contraire. 📲 Partagez sur X/Twitter !
👍89❤23👌9
La métropole de Nantes : « gneugneu on INNOVE et on va faire des bâtiments SANS CLIM et BIOCLIMATIQUES » 👉 12 millions d'euros (d'argent public) 👉 5 500 m2 de bureaux et laboratoires 👉 inauguration en grande pompe en juin 2025 RÉSULTAT : un an à peine après son inauguration : 37°C dans les bureaux et 55% d'humidité, soit littéralement l'Amazonie. Les écolos fous ruinent le pays bâtiment par bâtiment et ville par v…
🤡109🤮18🤣16🤬5😢5❤1🖕1
🌅 Besoin de lire des bonnes nouvelles ? En voici 7 ! 🇫🇷 Le fichage numérique des Français passe à la trappe : le Conseil constitutionnel a censuré l'interdiction des réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans. Le dispositif imposait à tout le monde de prouver son âge par carte d'identité ou selfie biométrique. 🕌 Créée après les attentats de 2015 pour bâtir un « islam de France » compatible avec la République, la Fondation…
❤70👍16❤🔥10
Fin de partie pour l'argument « l'islamisme est d'extrême droite » Ego Non 22 août 2025
🔥46💯24❤5
🔉 Mettez le son ! Expérience de fou 🤯 à tester chez vous !
🤣85❤9😁5👍4🫡4👎2
Même plus besoin d'argumenter
🤣97❤25👏12😁2👍1
Indice : si les gens qui vous critiquent ressemblent à Manon Aubry, c'est probablement que vous êtes sur le bon chemin. Hugo "Némésis" Deux sur Valeurs Actuelles 9 février 2026
❤85🤣19👍15❤🔥7👏4🔥1
🐘 12 août : journée mondiale de l’éléphant ! Un animal particulièrement basé, comme le rappelle cette étude scientifique : « Les éléphants classifient les groupes ethniques humains en fonction de l'odeur et de la couleur des vêtements. Les éléphants sont donc capables de classifier les membres d'une espèce en sous-groupes qui présentent différents niveaux de danger. » 👌🏻 (Via @JeReinforme & @Thuletide)
❤59👌27🤣18🤔3🎃1
Nouvelle canicule en approche, équipez-vous 🚰
😍55🤣35
Les attentats terroristes sont une déchirure sans équivalent au sein d'un peuple quand il n'a pas connu la guerre... Mais c'est la face émergée de l'iceberg. Il y a tout ce qui en reste, même pour ceux qui n'y ont pas été confrontés directement : - les blocs de béton près des marchés de Noël, - les militaires aux abords des églises à l'approche des jours de fête, - les fouilles de sac à l'entrée des musées ou des éc…
💯87❤25🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @bonnedroite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Une Bonne Droite (UBD)” (@bonnedroite), 6,981 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonnedroite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.