Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 78 days, net -509. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,770–19,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 11:41
18,846
-1
22 Oct 2026, 08:44
18,847
-11
21 Oct 2026, 01:00
18,858
-5
20 Oct 2026, 01:09
18,863
-3
19 Oct 2026, 03:15
18,866
+2
18 Oct 2026, 06:07
18,864
-3
17 Oct 2026, 08:56
18,867
+5
16 Oct 2026, 09:20
18,862
-7
15 Oct 2026, 09:09
18,869
-8
14 Oct 2026, 10:31
18,877
-17
12 Oct 2026, 22:15
18,894
-32
8 Oct 2026, 12:20
18,926
-16
4 Oct 2026, 00:16
18,942
-60
25 Sept 2026, 06:41
19,002
-44
18 Sept 2026, 18:19
19,046
-7
16 Sept 2026, 09:19
19,053
-10
13 Sept 2026, 07:19
19,063
-17
11 Sept 2026, 07:19
19,080
-20
8 Sept 2026, 11:57
19,100
-33
5 Sept 2026, 05:39
19,133
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 50s
Average length
1m 29s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,782 reactions across 31 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
5,839
59.7%
💯
627
6.41%
👏
613
6.27%
😁
605
6.18%
❤
320
3.27%
👍
247
2.53%
🍌
241
2.46%
🏆
240
2.45%
🤬
227
2.32%
😎
219
2.24%
🦄
203
2.08%
🙊
97
0.992%
🫡
66
0.675%
👌
60
0.613%
🔥
39
0.399%
🍾
27
0.276%
🥰
27
0.276%
⚡
19
0.194%
🆒
15
0.153%
🎉
9
0.092%
10 further kinds
42
0.429%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 31 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KimJongUnique. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Mon livre a mis un ratio à celui de Gabriel Attal sur Amazon (8000e contre 13800e).
Ils ont les réseaux de pouvoir, les institutions, les médias, et pourtant, un bouffon d’internet, comme moi, met Gabriel Attal en PLS sur le terrain des livres.
En dehors du jeu politique qu’ils verrouillent, on peut les annihiler. Ils ne sont rien.
Mon livre "50 idées reçues gauchistes sur l’économie" est enfin disponible chez Amazon.
C’est un livre de vulgarisation de l’économie, dans un style accessible, qui vise à permettre à tout un chacun de débunker les mensonges de la gauche, que l’on entend trop souvent dans notre quotidien : lors des repas, à la machine à café, sur les réseaux sociaux, à la télé...
Je vous ai mis une partie du sommaire et un extrait.…
Mère célibataire de 5 enfants, qui recherche un black.
Ce profil Tinder est hors-compétition. On voit qu’elle cherche à maximiser les allocs pour mère-célibataire à la CAF avec une progéniture eligible.
La première femme française à sortir dans l’espace n’a pas réussi sa mission de réparation.
Quand je pense à toutes les fois où j’ai dû ouvrir un bocal pour ma femme ou aider une collègue à déplacer du lourd, je me doute du résultat si tu envoies une gonzesse réparer une antenne dans l’espace.
Filez-moi le poste de DRH à l’agence spatiale européenne. Je pense qu’on évitera de tels epic fails.
Vidéo exclusive de la réunion où la Direction Générale des Finances Publiques avait conçu le mot de passe solide qui devait pourtant empêcher la fuite de données massive des contribuables.
Qui aurait pu prédire?
Je suis choqué : en Colombie, le nouveau président refuse de respecter les droits de l’Homme dans la lutte contre les narcotrafiquants communistes.
Je déconne. Il a bien raison de les arroser à la mitraillette ces sales rouges.
Je viens d’ouvrir une page Facebook.
On part à l’assaut de la citadelle des normies et des boomers.
Ce qui m’a motivé, c’est que j’avais un petit compte pour suivre l’actualité locale et les informations diverses. Un jour, il y avait eu un débat sur la page de ma ville sur un projet de HLM.
Je m’étaus exprimé en disant que "ce genre d’habitations attirait des cassos du Tiers-Monde qui défèquent dans les ascenseurs…
😁151🤣133👍45🫡20❤16👏7🎉3🆒3
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @KimJongUnique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🔴 Damien Rieu @Damienrieu · 21,371 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
La Nouvelle France 🇫🇷 @la_nouvelle_france · 24,875 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
⬛️La Zone Tv🟥Lazone interdite la zone interdite @lazoneinterdite_off · 36,153 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 1 September 2026
Quoi2news 👀 @quoi2news · 31,145 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Occidentis @occidentisfr · 26,554 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
SNP-INTEL @snp_intel · 103,835 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
Aubontouitefrancais @aubontouite_francais · 48,429 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Neodia @neodia · 47,742 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Boris Karpov 🇷🇺 📣 Brèves de Russie @boriskarpovrussie · 20,949 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
Savoir Libre @savoirlibre · 21,137 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Momotchi @momotchiii · 34,941 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Silvano Trotta Officiel @trottasilvano · 120,641 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
Les Patriotes 🇫🇷 @les_patriotes · 23,611 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
🎙 ALEXIS POULIN 🎙 @alexis_poulin · 24,926 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Christine Deviers-Joncour Officiel @xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,407 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KimJongUnique 👖” (@KimJongUnique), 18,846 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KimJongUnique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.