Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
@Ketabi_fy was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@TarhBOOK held 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Growth
47 measurements spanning 80 days, net +23,634. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,328–62,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 12:10
58,582
+592
7 Nov 2026, 06:30
57,990
+200
6 Nov 2026, 05:29
57,790
+264
5 Nov 2026, 06:50
57,526
+329
4 Nov 2026, 06:11
57,197
+212
3 Nov 2026, 07:09
56,985
+251
2 Nov 2026, 06:29
56,734
+289
1 Nov 2026, 03:10
56,445
+320
31 Oct 2026, 04:21
56,125
+116
30 Oct 2026, 06:56
56,009
+253
29 Oct 2026, 04:01
55,756
+278
28 Oct 2026, 04:40
55,478
+340
27 Oct 2026, 06:09
55,138
+235
26 Oct 2026, 08:44
54,903
+407
25 Oct 2026, 09:57
54,496
+596
24 Oct 2026, 08:50
53,900
+388
23 Oct 2026, 06:27
53,512
+450
22 Oct 2026, 06:37
53,062
+456
20 Oct 2026, 20:50
52,606
+401
19 Oct 2026, 21:05
52,205
first reading
Engagement
284 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.58%
avg views ÷ 58,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.031%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 284 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 109 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
284 (21 October 2025 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
228,860
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 37s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
237 reactions across 67 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
175
73.8%
❤🔥
22
9.28%
🔥
17
7.17%
👀
14
5.91%
🏆
2
0.844%
👌
2
0.844%
👍
2
0.844%
👏
2
0.844%
🥰
1
0.422%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 284 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 284 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 110 posts held from the last 30 days (5.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
خودارضایی تابوییه که حالا حالا ها بچه هامون نمیتونن در موردش بیان حرف بزنن
یه مریض داشتم طفلی انقد اطلاعاتشو محدود کرده بودن که
میگفت دکتر فک کنم مریضم نمیدونست اون حس خواستن درونش چیه و باید چیکار کنه
انقد محدود شده بود که حتی نمیدونست اسمش چیه تا مشکلشو بگه
دوست داشتین ویسای خانم دکترو گوش بدین کامل توضیح میدن یکم اطلاعاتتون بره بالا
Masturb_Voice
Masturb_Voice
بچه هایی که در مورد خودارضایی پرسیدین و مشکل داشتین
خانم دکتر در موردش حرف زده
و اطلاعات خوبی داده هم در مورد نحوه کنترل هم در مورد مزایاش
ویسشو گوش کنین
اگر سوالی بود بپرسین ناشناس
Masturb_Voice
Masturb_Voice
🔴 برنامه ریزی تحصیلی رایگان:
🔝ویژه سازمان سنجش
*500*100110120#
🔝بچه ها این کد بزنید برنامه ریزی خودتونو دریافت کنید دریافت کنید
👍 اینم هدیه کانال ما به شما🔥
🚨 فرمول بیست عربی با استاد فلاح💣
💛میدونی عربی رو چجوری بخونی که امتحان نهایی ۲۰ بگیری؟ 💛
💛کارگاه روش مطالعه عربی با استاد فلاح🚀
😊نیک منش، مشاوره تخصصی کنکور😊
💛شنبه ۱۶ آبان ساعت 21:00💛
برای ثبت نام رایگان💛 در کارگاه⤵️⤵️⤵️
💛@Nikmanesh_academybot💛
💛@Nikmanesh_academybot💛
💛شماره یک عربی کشور منتظرته💛
💛کارگاه روش مطالعه عربی استاد فلاح رو رایگان ثبت نام کن💛
💛ثبت نام کارگاه فرمول بیست عربی⤵️⤵️⤵️
💛@Nikmanesh_academybot💛
❤1
Signed Amir
Showing the 12 most recent of 284 posts we hold for @Ketabi_fy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ketabi_fy edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 October 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @Ketabi_fy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
21 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
23 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Ketabi_fy named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@takhmin_taraz_bot named in 2 posts, 30 August 2026 – 3 September 2026
@diji_maze named in 1 post, 8 November 2026 – 8 November 2026
@kheilisabz named in 1 post, 2 November 2026 – 2 November 2026
@ensania named in 1 post, 6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@akademifaraz named in 1 post, 6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@rotbe6 named in 1 post, 6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@fargakonkor named in 1 post, 6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@bragesefid named in 1 post, 6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@dimanakademi named in 1 post, 6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@takhmin1405 named in 1 post, 22 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
عربی فلاح 1406 @tarmiimfallah · 50,978 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
یکتا 1406 @yektatarmiim · 34,891 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
فیزیک شجاعی 1406 @shojaei_physiics · 57,566 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
اریان حیدری 1406 @ariyanheidari · 47,842 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
ادبیات جعفری | یکتا @jafariyekta · 47,519 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتابیفای | مرجع اصلی پخش ●” (@Ketabi_fy), 58,582 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ketabi_fy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.