National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,433–29,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 13:07
28,507
+1
6 Nov 2026, 16:28
28,506
-4
4 Nov 2026, 19:01
28,510
+1
3 Nov 2026, 21:34
28,509
-3
2 Nov 2026, 23:56
28,512
-8
1 Nov 2026, 23:30
28,520
-4
31 Oct 2026, 21:55
28,524
+2
30 Oct 2026, 19:59
28,522
-7
29 Oct 2026, 20:36
28,529
-3
28 Oct 2026, 20:28
28,532
-5
27 Oct 2026, 16:41
28,537
-2
26 Oct 2026, 16:39
28,539
-2
25 Oct 2026, 14:36
28,541
-17
24 Oct 2026, 13:25
28,558
+12
23 Oct 2026, 16:05
28,546
-12
22 Oct 2026, 18:26
28,558
-11
21 Oct 2026, 11:38
28,569
-6
20 Oct 2026, 10:56
28,575
-4
19 Oct 2026, 12:19
28,579
-7
18 Oct 2026, 14:56
28,586
first reading
Engagement
1,439 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 226 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.06%
avg views ÷ 28,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
558 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.679%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
558
of 1,439 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 422 of 558 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
1,439 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
804,256
Reactions total
4,352
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 12:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 14m
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 303 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,336 reactions across 741 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,016
27.5%
🤬
1,122
15.3%
😁
766
10.4%
👏
625
8.52%
👍
566
7.72%
😢
405
5.52%
👎
376
5.13%
😭
340
4.63%
💔
317
4.32%
😡
225
3.07%
🤔
170
2.32%
😱
107
1.46%
🤯
100
1.36%
🥱
29
0.395%
😐
28
0.382%
🥴
25
0.341%
🤨
19
0.259%
👀
18
0.245%
🤷♂
17
0.232%
🥰
17
0.232%
12 further kinds
48
0.654%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 758 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 31 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 558 posts held from the last 30 days (1.79%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
باران نعمت خداست، اما وقتی بیتدبیری و ضعف مدیریت مسئولان حاکم باشد، همین نعمت به خسارت تبدیل میشود.
مشکل از باران نیست؛ مشکل از نبود مدیریت و پیشگیری است. مردم تا کی باید تاوان کمکاری مسئولان را بدهند؟
| رصد تحولات منطقه و جهان:
| https://t.me/kurdnewsir
کانال ایتا:
| https://eitaa.com/kurdnews_ir
کانال روبیکا:
| https://rubika.ir/kurdnewsir
۱۰ نکته درباره رانندگی ایمن در هوای بارانی
هلالاحمر اعلام کرد:
🔹️سرعت را کاهش دهید
🔸️فاصله ایمنی را افزایش دهید
🔹️چراغ هارا روشن کنید
🔸️از کروز کنترل استفاده نکنید
🔹️مراقب آبگرفتگی باشید
🔸️ترمز و فرمان را نرم به کار ببرید
🔹️برف پاک کنو بخارگیر را بررسی کنید
🔸️لاستیک هارا بررسی کنید
🔹️از مناطق پرآب و جریان های شدید دوری کنید
🔸️تمرکز کامل داشته باشید
| رصد تحولات منطقه و جهان:
| https://t.me/kurdnewsir
ک…
فک کنم اگه هرشب با ۱۰۰ هزار تومن میومدین چنل بت ما ، شبی بالای ۲ میلیون سود کرده بودین مثل دیشب:)😊😂
🅰r16
میگی ن ؟ بیا تو چنلمون و ببین🔥
Join Join Join
Join Join Join
واکنش ترامپ به انفجار دیشب در قشم
خبرنگار: امروز گزارش هایی از حملات هوایی در نزدیکی ایران منتشر شد. آیا آمریکا این کار را انجام داده است؟
🔹ترامپ: نمیخواهم در مورد آن صحبت کنم.
| رصد تحولات منطقه و جهان:
| https://t.me/kurdnewsir
کانال ایتا:
| https://eitaa.com/kurdnews_ir
کانال روبیکا:
| https://rubika.ir/kurdnewsir
اگه هرشب با ۵۰۰ تومن بیاین چنل بت ما، شبی بالای 2 میلیون تومن سود میکنید💵🙂
میگی نه؟ یه شب بیا آمار چک کن 😄
فرمها و لایو های مطمئن امشب فوتبال رو از دست نده!👇👇
https://t.me/+laf8I3RIuq42MDk8
https://t.me/+laf8I3RIuq42MDk8
✅ مدارس کردستان فردا شنبه ۱۶ آبان تعطیل شد
🔸مدیرکل مدیریت بحران استانداری کردستان از تعطیلی مدارس تمامی مقاطع تحصیلی استان در روز شنبه ۱۶ آبانماه، به دنبال صدور هشدار قرمز هواشناسی و پیشبینی بارش شدید باران و احتمال وقوع سیلاب خبر داد.
🔸به گزارش روابط عمومی استانداری کردستان، تحسین عزیزی اظهار کرد: این تصمیم در پی صدور هشدار قرمز هواشناسی و با تصویب شورای هماهنگی مدیریت بحران استان، با هدف حفظ سلامت دانشآموزان…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,439 posts we hold for @KurdNewsir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@KurdNewsir edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 158 posts on @KurdNewsir as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
65
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Zilan proxi | پروکسی @zilan_proxi · 22,440 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 September 2026
کلیپ و اهنگ های اینستاگرام @ghaam8181 · 136,216 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
زاگرس خبرکردستان zagroos_khabar@ @zagroos_khabar · 30,327 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
دیواندره پلاس @divandare_plas · 21,562 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 September 2026
بنام مادر پدر @benamepedar_madar · 33,290 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
کرماشان 19 @kermashan19 · 21,887 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 September 2026
🌾کانال کشاورزان و دامداران کشور @keshavarzan_dam · 85,332 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
تاریخ تلخ @tarikhe_talkh · 61,519 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
گیاهان دارویی @giahdaruteb · 51,694 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
حقوق کارکنان کشوری و لشکری @hoghogh_20 · 39,083 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
طب سنتی و اسلامی @sonnati_tebb1 · 43,781 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
وره بکـــَـــنهَ | Werebkâna️ @WereBkana · 20,560 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
ترفند محشر @tarfand_mahshr · 30,524 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 7 September 2026
👨⚕️حقایق پزشکی 📚 @fact_pezeshki · 53,040 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
هواشناسی وایو « غرب کشور » @havaiegarbe · 27,565 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
سخنان حکیمانه ناب @sokhen_nab · 76,601 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
کتیبه؛ موسیقی و شعر @katibehchannel1 · 55,461 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کورد نیوز | انتخابات” (@KurdNewsir), 28,507 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KurdNewsir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.