⭕️فووری / زن سپهر حیدری از ویدیو لخت و سکسی خودش رو نمایی کرد💦👇 + مشاهده فیلم و عکسای لو رفته 🔞

Channel
♣️♥️دلــنـــــوازان♥️♣️
@delnavazankh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,506subscribers
-418 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001246223350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delnavazankh |
| Description | ا❤ ﷽ ❤ا تــمــام دنــیـ🌍ــا را گــشــتــه امــ امــا ڪــنــار تــو ؛ دنــیـ🌍ــاے دیـگـریــســتــ بـے صـدا ڪـن لــفــت نـده اینستاگرام 《کلیپ بینظیر》 افتتاح شد روی لینک بزنید و Follow کنید.. 🔴 instagram.com/Clipdadl ایدی مدیر برای تبادلات @mehrbanol |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delnavazankh |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 35,506 | -6 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 35,512 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 35,525 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 35,527 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 35,541 | -28 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 35,569 | -38 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 35,607 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 35,608 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 35,612 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 35,629 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 35,634 | -40 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 35,674 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 35,691 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 35,711 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 35,727 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 35,730 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 35,744 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 35,756 | -30 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 35,786 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 35,791 | first reading |
Engagement
790 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.14%
- avg views ÷ 35,506 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,180
- 465 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 465
- of 790 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 790 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,014,275 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,700
- Videos
- ≈51,500
- Links
- ≈4,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12h 36m
- Average length
- 1m 53s
Measured directly from 401 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🔹 آرام جوینده در موزیک ویدئو جدیدش بدون شورت و سوتین جنجال به پا کرد ! 🔞👇🫣 مشاهده کلیپ 🔞➡️
لب کارون... تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
افشاگری کارشناس محیط زیست خیانتی که به ایران و ملت شد! چگونه دریاچه ارومیه را خشک کنیم... و کاری که انجام شد تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
🎥 تاریخ فراموش نخواهد کرد 😁 سخنرانی احمدی نژاد در آمریکا وقتش تموم شد گفت وان دقیقه تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
گاهی یک شعر بیشتر از هزار نصیحت، آدم را به فکر فرو میبرد... این شعر، با نگاهی متفاوت از ایمان، بهشت و رفتار انسانها حرف میزند و از مخاطب میخواهد پیش از هر قضاوتی، کمی بیشتر بیندیشد... خلیل جوادی، شاعر، ترانهسرا و طنزپرداز ایرانی، متولد ۱۳۵۳ است. او با زبانی ساده اما تأثیرگذار، دغدغههای اجتماعی و انسانی را در قالب شعر بیان میکند.. تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
🎥 ویدئوی زیبا از مشهد سال ۵۶ 👌😍 تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
یک ماه زندگی در مهر ماه سال ۱۳۴۴ تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
جان کیریاکو، تحلیلگر سابق سیا: اسرائیل هزاران افغان را در ایران با ۱۰۰ دلار برای جاسوسی به خدمت گرفت!! صدها هزار پناهنده افغان در ایران هستند و هرگز تابعیت ایران را نخواهند گرفت. ناامیدند و اسرائیلیها همین افراد را استخدام کردهاند. تـلـگـرام❤️اینستاگرام
زنی با زیباترین و بزرگترین پستان رکوردار جهان 👇🥰 مشاهده ی کلیپ🔞
🚫در این پمپ بنزین در کشور اوکراین هر خانومی که لخت بشه میتونه بنزین مجانی بزنه...‼️😳⛽️ مشاهده فیلم🔞
🚫اگه سرتون درد میکنه برای دیدن انسانهای غیر عادی و عجایب دنیا😱🙈 به این کانال #بدون_سانسور حتما سر بزنید😵😱😍 🔞کلیپ های داغ و خفن اینجا👇 @AjibuGharib @AjibuGharib
Showing the 12 most recent of 790 posts we hold for @delnavazankh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@delnavazankh edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🎲پدر تاریخ ادبیات کیست؟
- شهریار13%
- زرین کوب21%
- ذبیح الله صفا17%
- فردوسی49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 790 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@moj_aramesh · 1,18416 posts..
@TAHLILGAR_JANG · 143 postsمحافظ کانال عجیب غریب
@AjibuGharib · 7922 postsمحافظ کانال حیات وحش بدون سانسور
@hayatevahshs · 1,9162 postsبـیـــمـاریهـــا
@Bimaariha · 33,9691 postدانستنی ها
@danstani · 251 postآموزش همه چی
@idea_instagrm · 1,0241 postԼαԼαԼαɴƊ™
@LaLaLandTm · 205,2901 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@delnavazankh named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 7 September 2026
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ghaam8181 · 128,824
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@moziku · 150,009
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
@mykhatereha · 30,001
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
@STORIMUSIX · 31,810
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
@shahriar_ostad · 26,459
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
@Kapfko22 · 25,860
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
@tarikhe_talkh · 61,648
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
@bitohargezjjj · 28,279
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
@mood_change · 30,645
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
@hesseziba33 · 24,442
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
@navaye_loor · 68,631
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@hamisherahii · 64,403
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@shahmusix · 25,532
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
@KurdNewsir · 28,734
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
@kalamejan · 29,824
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
@refah_news1 · 27,740
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
@ttext_Profile · 29,474
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
@katibehchannel1 · 55,834
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@beauty_travel · 53,190
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
@Worlddax · 62,105
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@heseeeekhub · 28,665
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
@mowllana · 54,945
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
@nabtarin_tex · 25,860
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
@loveispublic · 58,409
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♣️♥️دلــنـــــوازان♥️♣️” (@delnavazankh), 35,506 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delnavazankh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.