18 measurements spanning 31 days, net +480. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 09:19
14,140
-30
4 Sept 2026, 13:59
14,170
-12
3 Sept 2026, 00:08
14,182
-25
1 Sept 2026, 19:04
14,207
+14,163
24 Aug 2026, 22:39
44
-13,590
21 Aug 2026, 22:07
13,634
-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:01
13,639
-5
19 Aug 2026, 13:42
13,644
+1
17 Aug 2026, 17:56
13,643
+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:57
13,642
-1
13 Aug 2026, 18:26
13,643
-1
12 Aug 2026, 19:33
13,644
-1
11 Aug 2026, 22:42
13,645
+5
10 Aug 2026, 23:44
13,640
-3
9 Aug 2026, 23:33
13,643
-11
7 Aug 2026, 22:51
13,654
-5
7 Aug 2026, 00:11
13,659
-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:01
13,660
first reading
Engagement
199 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.94%
avg views ÷ 14,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
159 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
159
of 199 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 133 of 159 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
199 (5 August 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
223,482
Reactions total
9,373
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 12s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,843 reactions across 162 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,866
24.2%
😁
2,315
19.5%
🤣
1,817
15.3%
😱
1,099
9.28%
👍
982
8.29%
🙏
708
5.98%
💔
415
3.50%
🥴
295
2.49%
😢
257
2.17%
🤩
182
1.54%
🤨
172
1.45%
👏
159
1.34%
😘
106
0.895%
🤔
87
0.735%
🤷♀
79
0.667%
🥰
75
0.633%
👌
58
0.49%
😭
54
0.456%
😍
38
0.321%
🤪
24
0.203%
6 further kinds
55
0.464%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,843 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این عروس و دوماد ایرانی داستان لحظه اشناییشون رو به صورت ویدئو ساختن و تو مراسم عروسیشون واسه همه پخش کردن که خیلی مورد استقبال قرار گرفته و کلیپشون خیلی وایرال شده
چقدر ایده قشنگ و دوستداشتنیای! اتفاقاً این سبک ویدیوها که به Love Story یا «قصهی عشق» معروفن، چند وقتیه توی عروسیهای ایرانی خیلی طرفدار پیدا کردن.
به جای یک کلیپ فرمالیته ساده و رقصیدن جلوی دوربین، عروس و داماد داستان واقعی آشنایی، چالشها، یا لحظه…
سلام سحر جون و خانمهای گل✋
میترا هستم
وای این چالش خواستگاری خیلی خوبه اینقدر به خانم آرایشگری که حسین آقا بقال محل رو هم در جریان خواستگار داشتنش قرار داده خندیدم که اشک چشام بند نمیومد😂😂😂😂😂
القصه من از ده دوازده سالگی صدبار از مامانم شنیده بودم که چون خواهرت خیلی از تو خوشگل تره میترسم این زودتر بره و تو رو دستم بمونی😭دلیل این حرف زشت بودن من نبودا فقط به دلیل شباهتم به عمم بود که تا سالیان سال اعتماد بنفس منو زیر …
♨️باورم نمیشد با این روش اینقدر #سفید و بلوری میشی...😍😳🙈
👈🏼تنها با چند ترکیب ساده #پوستت سفید سفید میشه ‼️ طوری که همسرت عاشقت میشه ....⚠️🤪
⏬جهت یادگیری این روش آسون
بزن اینجا 👇🏽
https://t.me/+zD2AedzVuC80YjI8
https://t.me/+zD2AedzVuC80YjI8
از دستش بدی خودت ضرر کردی❌ رو دست این روش نیست ⚠️
سلام مهربانو جوونم
حدود ۲۰ سال پیش ما یک خاستگار داشتیم مامانش خیلی کنه بود از همسایه هامون بود
هی با بهونه و بی بهونه میاومد خونمون
یک بار برق ها رفته بود حدود غروب بود خلاصه طول کشید تا هوا تاریکشد و برق ها که اومد منم همون موقع اومدم تو پذیرایی که برق اومد
روشنشد دیدم اون خانم یک گوشه نشسته
وای یک جیغی کشیدم
حالا مامانم تعارف کرده بود اومده تو
خودش رفته بود پذیرایی بیاره
خب زن حسابی برق نیست
الان چه موقع خاس…
سلام به همگی
سلام ویژه به بانو سحر 😍
من از ۱۵ سالگی خواستگار داشتم
داماد بزرگمون خیلی رومن حساس بود چون خواهر نداشت من دوست داشت همیشه می گفت باید بهترین شوهر برا تو انتخاب کنم
هرکس از دامادمون من خواستگاری می کرد خودش ردش می کرد بد ها من می فهمیدم 😜😂 کلا دیگه قید شوهر زدم چون اونیکه من می خواستم نشد نامردی در حقم کرد دیگه حس شوهر کردن از سرم انداخته بودم
حالا بماند تا چند سال بعد دیگه خواستگاری من کم شد تا یکی از…
رژیـــم نگـیـریـد 😳🤨🤫
اگر چاق هستید و بیشتر اضافه وزنتون شکم و پهلوهاتون جمع شده، رژیم غذایی روش مناسبی نیست 😟
رژیم سوخت ساز بدنتون پایین میاره و باعث میشه اضافه وزن بیشتری برگرده
وارد کانال زیر بشید تا راه درمان بیش از 8000نفر که به سادگی لاغر شدن رو ببینید👌👌
برای درمان چاقی روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید👇👇
https://t.me/+QvnYEOGgZiWT7mnx
https://t.me/+QvnYEOGgZiWT7mnx
خیلی زود پاک میشه
یکبار برای همیشه لاغر شو. ولاغر بمان…
سلام مهربانو عزیز وخواهر ای گلم منم ماجرای خاستگاری بامزه ای داشتم گفتم براتون تعریف کنم دور هم بخندیم 😄 من ومامانم یه روز مشغول خانه تکانی بودیم که خالم هم اومده بود خونمون سر نهار بود من هم یه لباس داغون تنم بود با یه روسری کهنه والبته دمپایی مردونه🤣 حسابی مشغول تمیز کاری بودم که یه اقایی در زدن و اومدن خونه
اشنای قدیمی پدرم بودن
همه جا درهم بر هم بود یه جایی برای بنده خدا پیدا کردیم نشست ویکی خونه رو جمع وجو…
وسطِ اینهمه روزای دلگیر، آرزو میکنم اگه این روزا هر گِرهای تو زندگیت وجود داره، معجزهای واست اتفاق بیفته که بگی بالاخره همهچیز درست شد.
صبح بخیر☕️
@zaanoone
سلام عزیزم
در جواب چالش باحال خواستگاری
مامان منم مثل یه سری از مامانا کلا خواستگار به خونه راه نمیداد و من از این ور اون ور میشنیدم که فلانی خواستگارته و این حرفا
و جالبه بدونین تنها خواستگاری که مستقیما خودم درجریانش قرار گرفتمو زارتی بله رو دادم شوهرم بود🥴ینی انقد هول بودم من😆
همیشه هم بهش میگم گمون میکنم جادو جنبلم کردی😂
شوهرم تعریف میکرد یه سری قبل از خواستگاری ازت شنیده بودم که فلانی تو رو میخواد و چون ازش خو…
🔺متـن بـالا رو دو بـار بخـون
قبل از اینکه کار از کار بگذره و زندگیتون با همین چیزای کوچیک بپاشه ، بزنین رو لینک زیر و با مشاور های متخصص همکده درباره هر مشکلی که دارید صحبت کنید👇
https://landing.hamkadeh.com/SUax2
https://landing.hamkadeh.com/SUax2
لینک کانال
https://t.me/hamkadehhh
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @zaanoone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zaanoone named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@organickoilandtea named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♥️ چالش زنونه ♥️” (@zaanoone), 14,140 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaanoone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.