Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 44 days, net +7,901. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:18
181,914
-817
16 Sept 2026, 10:01
182,731
-747
14 Sept 2026, 16:01
183,478
-791
13 Sept 2026, 05:36
184,269
-1,353
11 Sept 2026, 07:57
185,622
+6,028
8 Sept 2026, 16:18
179,594
+2,419
5 Sept 2026, 07:20
177,175
+4,833
3 Sept 2026, 14:59
172,342
+172,261
26 Aug 2026, 20:44
81
-170,981
25 Aug 2026, 20:07
171,062
-130
24 Aug 2026, 19:28
171,192
-130
23 Aug 2026, 00:45
171,322
-134
21 Aug 2026, 17:09
171,456
-113
20 Aug 2026, 17:37
171,569
-93
19 Aug 2026, 18:43
171,662
-94
18 Aug 2026, 21:05
171,756
-462
17 Aug 2026, 18:15
172,218
-231
16 Aug 2026, 14:52
172,449
-187
14 Aug 2026, 23:28
172,636
-206
13 Aug 2026, 12:48
172,842
first reading
Engagement
1,417 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.56%
avg views ÷ 181,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,470
779 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.419%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
779
of 1,417 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 750 of 779 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
1,417 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
5,039,700
Reactions total
20,838
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 19:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈55,700
Videos
≈12,600
Links
≈2,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 05m
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 204 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,921 reactions across 963 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
6,146
23.7%
😁
4,843
18.7%
❤
4,335
16.7%
👎
3,185
12.3%
👍
3,112
12.0%
👏
1,480
5.71%
😢
1,231
4.75%
😐
445
1.72%
👌
381
1.47%
💔
357
1.38%
😱
244
0.941%
🫡
32
0.123%
🤩
28
0.108%
🎉
27
0.104%
😍
19
0.073%
🙏
17
0.066%
🤗
16
0.062%
😇
12
0.046%
💯
11
0.042%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 968 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,921 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
صداوسیما: با اصرار نماینده آمریکا دیدار آقای عراقچی با ویتکاف در حاشیه مجمع عمومی برگزار شد
🔹ابلاغ شروط ایران برای بازگشایی تنگه هرمز دلیل پذیرش درخواست ویتکاف برای این دیدار بوده است.
🔹مواضع قاطع ایران در این دیدار به نماینده آمریکا ابلاغ شده است.
🔹رفع فوری محاصره دریایی، پرداخت فوری همه اموال مسدود شده ایران و پایان جنگ در همه جبهه های مقاومت از جمله شروط ایران برای بازگشایی تنگه هرمز است.
😉 @arz_talaaa
اسرائیل هیوم به نقل از منابع آمریکایی:
🔹دیدار نمایندگان آمریکا با تیم ایرانیِ عراقچی از پیش برنامهریزی شده بود و نخستوزیر قطر در بخش عمده آن حضور داشت
🔹 در این نشست درباره ازسرگیری مذاکرات و بازگشایی تنگه هرمز گفتگو شد، اما بر سر مسائل مناقشهبرانگیز توافقی به دست نیامد.
😉 @arz_talaaa
ترامپ ایران:
🔹حتماً، به نفع آنهاست که توافق کنند. و اگر بتوانیم این کار را انجام دهیم، به نظر من ترجیح هم همین است.
🔹دو گزینه وجود دارد: یکی یک اتفاق بسیار بد است و دیگری میتواند به عظمت برای کشور منجر شود.
😉 @arz_talaaa
ترامپ درباره ایران:
🔹امروز، یک ساعت پیش گفتگویی انجام شد. آن بسیار خوب بود. یک ساعت پیش به پایان رسید.
🔹این یک جلسهای بود که سه ساعت طول کشید.
🔹این یک عظمت، عظمت بالقوه، یا نابودی است.
🔹در یک حالت، نابودی است. و گزینه دیگر، عظمت بالقوه است. میتواند کشوری بزرگ باشد.
😉 @arz_talaaa
ترامپ درباره ایران: ما نباید اجازه دهیم که آنها به سلاح هستهای دست پیدا کنند. و برای این کار، هزینهای وجود دارد.
🔴این کار باید توسط روسای جمهور دیگر، یا به طور صریح، کشورهای دیگر انجام میشد. برخی از کشورها میتوانستند وارد عمل شوند، اما واقعاً تعداد کمی از کشورها بودند که میتوانستند این کار را انجام دهند
😉 @arz_talaaa
🔴ترامپ درباره ایران: فکر میکنم توافقی حاصل خواهد شد
🔹آنها حتی امروز هم با ما در حال گفتوگو بودهاند
🔹بگذارید بگوییم که این رابطه در حال شکلگیری و پیشرفت است.
😉 @arz_talaaa
👎35❤14😢5😁4👍1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,417 posts we hold for @arz_talaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@arz_talaaa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@arz_talaaa named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rayan_ir named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pishbiniiiii named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Javdani international exchange @sarafijavdani · 7,400#27
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اخبار خودرو🔖 @akhbar_khodroei · 86,101 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 August 2026
اخبار جنگ | قیمت دلار طلا @akhbar_fori_dollar · 22,314 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 September 2026
کانال هواشناسی کل کشور🔖 @met_ir · 67,352 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
" دانستنی پدیا 💡" @DanestaniPedia · 49,174 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
کانال سلامت🔖 @Dr_salamati_ir · 27,742 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
اخبارموثق📺 @akhbr_mvsgh · 88,578 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
قیمت بازار دلار طلا خودرو @ba_z1 · 1,299,639 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار فوری حوادث @fouri_havades · 119,727 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
مجله بدانیم @majaleh_bedanim · 136,058 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
اخبار روز اقتصادی @ecodaily_news · 23,404 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 September 2026
قیمت آنلاین / اخبار اقتصادی @currency_gold · 505,039 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
سلامت / مهم @fouri_salamat · 116,749 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
« کانال ترخیص کاران » @Tarkhis_Karan · 34,035 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
اخبار روز خودرو @akhbar_khudro · 422,522 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
اخبار فوری تهران🔖 @fouri_tehran · 213,141 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
دنیای دارو @ettelaatdrug · 98,077 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
مثقال (تحلیل بازار) @Mzene · 46,454 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 26 August 2026
طلا خودرو @nerkh_foris · 198,149 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
خبر کوتاه فوری @kotah_fouri · 111,635 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
خبر فوری و مهم مقاومت @Roozname · 32,269 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
بانک اول @bank1 · 47,892 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قیمت ارز، طلا و خودرو” (@arz_talaaa), 181,914 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arz_talaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.