Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مدیر صندوق | Fund Manager

Channel

مدیر صندوق | Fund Manager

@Manager_fund

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,866subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002292330722
TypeChannel
Username@Manager_fund
Descriptionدر فاند منجر، مدیران حرفه‌ای و سرمایه‌گذاران خرد گرد هم می‌آیند تا با تحلیل‌های به‌روز، تجربیات واقعی بازار، مسیر موفقیت مالی خود را هموار کنند @Fund_analyze
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Manager_fund

Growth

7,8667,9687,9175 August 2026 — 7,968 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,968 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,944 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,934 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,929 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,906 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,886 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,873 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,866 subscribers5 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,851–7,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 22:237,866-7
24 Aug 2026, 23:067,873-13
21 Aug 2026, 04:547,886-20
18 Aug 2026, 14:357,906-23
15 Aug 2026, 12:577,929-5
12 Aug 2026, 03:177,934-10
9 Aug 2026, 02:317,944-24
6 Aug 2026, 03:047,968no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:117,968first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 7,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.839%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held82 (1 August 202626 August 2026)
Views total125,436
Reactions total1,051
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
942
Videos
1
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,051 reactions across 81 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍47545.2%
35433.7%
👎13913.2%
👏151.43%
🔥151.43%
😍111.05%
🤔100.951%
🥰100.951%
🥴80.761%
👌30.285%
😎30.285%
🙏30.285%
🎉20.19%
❤‍🔥10.095%
🌭10.095%
🤯10.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,051reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,100 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ سهام دوباره در صدر! ✅ برایند هفتگی چرخش نقدینگی حقیقی‌ها در بازار سرمایه طی هفته‌ای که گذشت... ▫️ در هفته معاملاتی که در حال سپری شدن هست و رو به اتمامه، برایند چرخش نقدینگی حقیقی‌ها در سهام بیش از 10 همت مثبت به اتمام رسید و برای پنجمین هفته متوالی، سهام با ورود پول حقیقی همراه بود. ▫️ در سایر ابزار بازار سرمایه، صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت و نقره برایند تقریباً خنثی داشتند که البته انتظار میره صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت تا

6👍4🥰3

26 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC≈1,310 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

👈 خرید صندوق اهرمی یا دریافت اعتبار معاملاتی از کارگزاری‌ها؟! ▫️ برای سودآوری اهرمی در بازار، سه راه متداول وجود داره؛ خرید آپشن (بسیار پرریسک)، دریافت اعتبار معاملاتی از کارگزاری‌ها (دغدغه در انتخاب سهام و مدیریت اعتبار و نقدینگی و مارجین و البته بهره اعتباری) و راه سوم که از همه جذاب‌تر و بی‌دردسرتره، خرید صندوق اهرمی! ▫️ با توجه به اینکه صندوق‌های اهرمی ضریب اهرمی دارند، اگه بازار رشد کنه، این صندوق‌ها چند برابر

👍108

25 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,530 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ حباب صندوق‌های نقره تا حد بسیار خوبی تخلیه شد! ▫️ کمترین حباب: #پلاتا 0.16 درصد ▫️ بیشترین حباب: #نقرفام 5.18 درصد ▫️ میانگین حباب: 1.8 درصد ✅| @Manager_Fund

👍84🥴2👏1

25 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,550 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ 3 همت پول حقیقی از صندوق‌های طلا خارج شد! ▫️ با خبر تصمیم بانک مرکزی برای ارزپاشی از طریق شبکه بانکی، و رنج منفی در معاملات دلار، صندوق‌های طلا هم با فشار عرضه همراه شدند امروز و تا این لحظه حدود 3 همت پول حقیقی از معاملات این صندوق‌ها خارج شده! ✅| @Manager_Fund

👍7👎5😎31

24 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈2,130 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ از ساعت 12 به بعد، بیش از 4.8 همت منابع حقیقی به صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت وارد شده! ▫️ از ساعت 12 که صندوق‌های طلا باز شده، صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت با ورود پول حقیقی سنگینی همراه شدند و تا این لحظه ترازشون نزدیک به 3 همت مثبت شده! ▫️ ساعت 12، تراز حقیقی‌ها در درآمد ثابت‌ها حدود 1.8 همت منفی بود! به نظر میرسه که پولی که از صندوق‌های طلا در معاملات امروز خارج شده، وارد صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت شده. ✅| @Manager_Fund ‌

👏65👍5🥰2

24 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,750 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ هدف بعدی صندوق‌های طلا؟! ▫️ صندوق‌های طلا همگی سقف‌شکنی کردند و رکوردهای جدید قیمتی ثبت کردند و امروز متعادل‌تر از دو روز گذشته معامله میشن. ▫️ در نمودار تکنیکالی این صندوق‌ها مشاهده میشه که قیمت به میدلاین کانال صعودی رسیده و بر اساس مبانی و قوانین تحلیل تکنیکال، در صورت تثبیت این ناحیه، هدف بعدی برای قیمت، سقف کانال قیمتی خواهد بود. ▫️ در تصویر، چارت تایم‌فریم روزانه صندوق طلای #زمرد رو مشاهده می‌کنید که از جم

👍10👎41❤‍🔥1👌1

24 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈1,560 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔺 بررسی عملکرد صندوق طلای #رزگلد / درخواستی ▫️ تاریخ شروع به فعالیت این صندوق، مهرماه سال گذشته بوده و از اون تاریخ تا کنون، بیش از تمامی بازارهای موازی شامل شاخص کل، شاخص هموزن، تتر و دلار، طلای 18 عیار و سکه بازدهی ثبت کرده! (تا پیش از شروع معاملات امروز، دیتای قیمت و بازده استخراج شده) ▫️ از اونجایی که ماهیت این صندوق هم فعالیت در بازار طلاست، برتری عملکردش نسبت به طلای 18 عیار و سکه قابل توجهه. رزگلد از ابتدای

👍74😍1

24 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,460 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🟢 بازدهی یک‌ساله صندوق‌های اهرمی / #بیدار تقریباً سه برابر شد! ▫️ در یک سال اخیر چقدر بازدهی در سرمایه‌گذاریتون داشتید؟! در هر بازاری بصورت سهامداری فعالیت می‌کردید، چنین بازدهی که در برترین اهرمی‌ها حاصل شده، نمیتونست حاصل بشه! ▫️ #بیدار در صدر این مقایسه قرار داره با 185 درصد بازدهی! و ماجرا جایی جالب میشه که هم‌اکنون هم حباب منفی سنگینی داره و در صورت ادامه روند صعودی در بازار سهام، کماکان میتونه جزو برترین‌ها د

👍61😍1

24 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,420 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔴 چرا معاملات #نارنج_اهرم ممنوع-متوقف شد؟! ▫️ درحالیکه امروز بازار پرعرضه آغاز به کار کرد، نارنج اهرم بر خلاف جریان بازار با قدرت به صف خرید رسید و در ادامه به یکباره معاملاتش ممنوع متوقف شد! ▫️ دلیل این موضوع، به بروز نبودن NAV این صندوق برمیگرده و به همین منظور هم بسته شده. بعد از بروز شدن NAV، نارنج باز میشه و معاملاتش به روال عادی برمیگرده. ✅| @Manager_Fund

👍51

24 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,400 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

👈 بروزرسانی بازدهی سه‌ماهه اهرمی‌ها 🟢 #جهش همچنان صدرنشین! ▫️ بررسی بازدهی صندوق‌های اهرمی در سه ماه اخیر، کماکان حکایت از برتری جهش داره. جهش در سه ماه اخیر (تقریباً از زمان بازگشایی بازار سهام پس از جنگ) 2.5 برابر شده! ▫️ این در حالیه که بین رتبه‌های اول تا آخر جدول فاصله زیادی هست و سه صندوق کمتر از 100 درصد بازدهی داشتند. @Manager_Fund

👍73👎1🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,590 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ تا این لحظه حدود 200 میلیارد تومان پول حقیقی از معاملات صندوق‌های طلا خارج شده؛ علی رغم اینکه اکثر صندوق‌ها در دامنه 4+ به بالا معامله میشن... ✅| @Manager_Fund ‌

👍12🥴52🌭1👎1

23 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,760 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✅ بین ده صندوق طلای بزرگ بازار، کدوم صندوق عملکرد بهتری در سه ماه اخیر به لحاظ رشد NAV داشته؟! ▫️ حالا که بازار طلا دوباره داغ شده و رونق گرفته، انتخاب صندوق مناسب، در بحث کسب بازدهی خیلی میتونه بهتون کمک کننده باشه. ▫️ این مقایسه، بین ده صندوق طلای بزرگ بازار صورت گرفته. بر این اساس، صندوق #گوهر با 9.29 درصد بازدهی NAV در سه ماه گذشته در صدر قرار داره و به نوعی بهترین عملکرد رو بین این صندوق‌ها به ثبت رسونده. ‌ ✅|

👍51

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @Manager_fund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,177,071 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مدیر صندوق | Fund Manager” (@Manager_fund), 7,866 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Manager_fund.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.