Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مانیکس

Channel

مانیکس

@ManixVid

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

103,142subscribers

+6,070 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119069151
TypeChannel
Username@ManixVid
Descriptionیوتوب: youtube.com/@ManixVid ناشناس: https://t.me/the404bot?start=772f09e4e3
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ManixVid

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

74,100 average views per post against 103,142 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.8%. Across the 1,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,077–316,222 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.97% and 9.55%, with a median of 4.63%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (3 August 2026 2 September 2026)
Posts measured37 of 37 published in the window (0 exact, 37 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,741,100
Mature posts only71.8% over 37 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers103,142 measured 2 September 2026
Cohortb100000:fas · 1,164 channels · p10 0.754% · p25 1.97% · p50 4.63% · p75 9.55% · p90 16.9%
Position in cohort99.484th percentile · 15.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.032% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 2 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

96,786103,329100,057.57 August 2026 — 97,072 subscribers7 August 2026 — 97,072 subscribers7 August 2026 — 97,000 subscribers8 August 2026 — 96,879 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96,786 subscribers10 August 2026 — 97,009 subscribers11 August 2026 — 96,991 subscribers12 August 2026 — 96,999 subscribers14 August 2026 — 97,020 subscribers15 August 2026 — 97,055 subscribers16 August 2026 — 97,191 subscribers18 August 2026 — 97,293 subscribers18 August 2026 — 99,922 subscribers19 August 2026 — 101,735 subscribers20 August 2026 — 102,372 subscribers22 August 2026 — 102,653 subscribers23 August 2026 — 103,052 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,243 subscribers26 August 2026 — 103,282 subscribers27 August 2026 — 103,316 subscribers27 August 2026 — 103,329 subscribers28 August 2026 — 103,321 subscribers30 August 2026 — 103,322 subscribers31 August 2026 — 103,216 subscribers31 August 2026 — 103,094 subscribers2 September 2026 — 103,142 subscribers103,1427 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 25 days, net +6,070. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,805–104,310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 00:05103,142+48
31 Aug 2026, 23:36103,094-122
31 Aug 2026, 01:15103,216-106
30 Aug 2026, 02:12103,322+1
28 Aug 2026, 22:54103,321-8
27 Aug 2026, 23:54103,329+13
27 Aug 2026, 01:17103,316+34
26 Aug 2026, 04:23103,282+39
25 Aug 2026, 02:22103,243+191
23 Aug 2026, 15:25103,052+399
22 Aug 2026, 00:37102,653+281
20 Aug 2026, 22:24102,372+637
19 Aug 2026, 22:59101,735+1,813
18 Aug 2026, 23:1599,922+2,629
18 Aug 2026, 00:0297,293+102
16 Aug 2026, 21:0597,191+136
15 Aug 2026, 14:0797,055+35
14 Aug 2026, 03:2697,020+21
12 Aug 2026, 22:0596,999+8
11 Aug 2026, 20:0196,991first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.8%
avg views ÷ 103,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
74,100
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held53 (22 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total2,741,100
Reactions total121,952
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
348
Videos
159
Links
187

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

183,028 reactions across 53 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
130,10271.1%
🤣28,01715.3%
😭5,5343.02%
💔4,2962.35%
👍3,4721.90%
😁1,3550.74%
💋1,1360.621%
🤨8850.484%
🍓8810.481%
🔥8310.454%
🎉7590.415%
💘6140.335%
❤‍🔥5130.28%
👏4920.269%
🥰3260.178%
🥴3180.174%
😐3100.169%
🤪3040.166%
🤔2820.154%
😢2710.148%
36 further kinds2,3301.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183,028 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 53 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ManixVid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈25,400 views2,225 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @thefarzadakPhoto

مانی ازم یه آدم ادایی ساخت 🎀😂 مانی ازم یه آدم ادایی ساخت 🎀😂 مانی ازم یه آدم ادایی ساخت 🎀😂

1,920🤣176🍓37🔥37😐30🗿16🤩7👏2

31 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈29,300 views3,569 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2,730🤣644🍓67💋58💘29👏18❤‍🔥17😁6

30 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈34,500 views3,871 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

📧 پیام جدید از طرف #4ad648e8b4 : ویدیو فاقد محتوای کپشن است.

🤣3,610158😭40🍓20💅14😁13🤪12🔥4

24 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈67,800 views6,095 reactions24 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5,210🎉553😁122💘84❤‍🔥45👍36👏27🔥18

20 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC≈91,600 views6,577 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @thefarzadakVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣5,510850💋61🌚54😁37🍓31👏18🔥16

19 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈109,000 views7,694 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

راستی چنلمون هم 100k شددد مرسی که هستید واقننن🫱🏻‍🫲🏼❤️

7,220🔥148🤩108🍓88❤‍🔥42🥰32👏28😈28

19 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈119,000 views6,807 reactionsread 2 September 2026

میخوام درباره اتفاقی که اخیرا افتاد و اشتباهی که از طرف من صورت گرفت مفصل باهاتون صحبت کنم و همچیز رو شفاف توضیح بدم. میدونم شاید خیلیاتون منتظر توضیح و پاسخ من باشید و بابت اینکه تا الان نتونستم دربارش صحبت کنم عذر میخوام. متاسفانه به خاطر آسیب دیدن دستم واقعا شرایط نوشتن و توضیح دادن مفصل برام سخت شده و نمیخوام صرفا برای اینکه زودتر چیزی گفته باشم یک توضیح ناقص یا عجولانه بدم. به محض اینکه حالم و شرایط دستم بهتر

5,620🤨787🤷‍♀168🤣94😱52🤝45🍓32😁9

19 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈90,000 views4,043 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام بچه ها چطوریدد

3,350👍338😭178🤷‍♀53🥱46🍓38😍23🔥17

19 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC≈90,100 views5,349 reactions4 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4,870💋238💘83🐳57🔥33🤩24👍23🥰21

18 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈101,000 views6,390 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5,070💔1,020💋116😁63🤷‍♂46💘34🔥22👏19

18 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈103,000 views6,706 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4,690😭1,500💔238😁103😢75👻36❤‍🔥35🥰29

18 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈95,500 views6,688 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4,220😭1,330🤣832💔154😢81💋37❤‍🔥18💯16

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @ManixVid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 515,164 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

علیض
@Aliztory · 169,942
#1
افشایدرمن
@afshartikk · 139,274
#2
بنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 172,126
#3
Reza Ayeene🪞
@rezaayeenetg · 21,200
#4
Ali Zodiac
@alizodiac · 14,539
#5
چنل پدرت
@pedaretdiana · 49,650
#6
AmirExcite
@AmirExcite · 723
#7
SECSHOT
@SEC_SHOT · 10,804
#8
Vinyv
@vinyvidzam · 63,220
#9
Ashkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 118,545
#10
سهیل سلبا
@solbasoheil · 146,287
#11
Matarzak
@matarzzak · 33,433
#12
بوگی لند
@BogyTVTelegram · 4,416
#13
سم اسنو
@Samsnowww · 22,442
#14
میم هاب | MemeHub
@MemeHubOriginal · 99,766
#15
Arman
@armanaaf · 42,339
#16
علی سیبیل
@Alisibbil · 1,433
#17
Amirali's otagh
@Amirali_mrt · 4,760
#18
-F 🦁☀️
@maVibes · 1,799 (as read 16 August 2026)
#19
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,460,042
#20
هادی هایروکس
@Hadihyrox1 · 21,266
#21
سد روسکی
@SeD_Ruski · 2,522
#22
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,903,185
#23
AmirEyZed 🍌
@amireyzed · 41,538
#24
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,482,054
#25
Rap King
@rapking · 306,821
#26
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 323,899
#27
kill ourselves
@letskills · 78,445
#28
RegaLeakShit🎄
@RegaLeakShit · 42,709
#29
HipHopTweety | هیپ هاپ توییتی
@HipHopTweety · 201,912
#30
تو بگو:
@YouBgo · 101,033
#31
عَرتا
@itsAwrta · 17,794
#32
همکلاسی
@hamclasixii · 28
#33
دارک پروکسی | Proxy mtproto
@darkproxy · 4,847,611
#34
پروکسی Proxy
@proxy_qavi · 3,480,739
#35
‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈
@rebccaghaderi · 268,806
#36
پارس توییت
@ParsTwt · 518,838
#37
بتمن
@Kioxex · 42
#38
‌ Do You Know | مجله ™
@razcom · 1,243,169
#39
The D
@thedelfam · 5,852
#40
MoonVerNal🌙✨️
@MoonVerNalw · 4,167
#41
Hip X Hopi
@hip_hopi · 268,762
#42
⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 944,943
#43
⋆ 𝗆𝖾 𝗇 𝗐𝗁𝗈 ?!
@mexxyoux · 98,837
#44
𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥
@drtel · 768,729
#45
محافظ YanPlays
@MakeYourCharacter · 1,025
#46
[ Fun HipHop ]
@funhiphop · 225,981
#47
مووی کاتیج
@CottageOrg · 816,366
#48
⚽️ بیست و دو | Bistodo
@bistodo · 393,215
#49
Pouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 61,396
#50
توییتی
@TweetyChannel · 780,623
#51
𝑴𝒐𝒐𝒏
@TheLight_Moon · 772
#52
AmirEyZed | Clips
@AmirEyZedClips · 5,336
#53
Verse Vibes| 🖤
@Lyricsteach · 40,776
#54
Rap God News
@RapGodNews · 173,296
#55
پروکسی دائمی تلگرام
@proxydaemi · 1,757,741
#56
RapCity
@rapcity · 80,428
#57
My Proxy | مای پروکسی
@Myporoxy · 4,487,903
#58
POV
@samepov · 46,955
#59
# typology‌‌
@MBTIV · 20,305
#60
RapTV
@raptv · 379,632
#61
MARIZ MEDIA
@MARIZMEDIA · 57,749
#62
maybe us.
@xbeus · 19,157
#63
Comentive | کامنتیو
@Comentive · 205,166
#64
یِ دانش آموز
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 943,199
#65
جوک قومیتی روزانه
@dailyofethnicjokes · 31,943
#66
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾.
@TheGamepc · 103,498
#67
Naomi.
@lNaomll · 16,103
#68
خلاف نما
@KhalafNama · 15,431
#69
Varzesh+plus | ورزش پلاس
@vaarzesh_plus · 330,513
#70
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,939,053
#71
🖤میم پونی
@pony_meme · 7,583
#72
محافظ تم
@TH3EME · 2,097
#73
Glowera
@jsksoansnsksziso · 89
#74
𝗢𝗵 𝗯𝗮𝗯𝘆 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆:)
@moonndiaryyy · 748
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

افشایدرمن
@afshartikk · 139,274
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
علیض
@Aliztory · 169,942
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
بنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 172,126
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Arman
@armanaaf · 42,339
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 August 2026
سهیل سلبا
@solbasoheil · 146,287
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Kouman | کومان
@Koumani · 47,002
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Walk¤ver
@saeed_walkover · 50,096
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Vittoparsa
@vittoparsayoutube · 137,119
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
اشکان شادکامی
@ashkan_shadkami · 159,718
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
Tekido👀Life
@tekidolife · 214,845
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
𝐒𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞.𝐢𝐫𝐧 | سارکولین
@sarcolineirn · 199,572
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
AmirEyZed 🍌
@amireyzed · 41,538
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Mia Plays
@MiaPlays · 90,458
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
𝖫𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗅𝗒 𝖬𝗎𝗌𝗂𝖼
@Literally_musicc · 108,819
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
سایت شرط بندی | دنس بت | بازی انفجار | کازینو آنلاین | دنسبت | dancebet | dance bet
@dancebet_page · 36,499
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
Viny
@vinyvidz · 85,176
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 18 August 2026
عمو تئوری
@TheoAmoory · 57,139
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
Ellenor MOOD
@ellenormood · 36,977
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
ARIA KEOXER
@KeoXer · 47,232
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مانیکس” (@ManixVid), 103,142 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ManixVid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.