Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علیرضا متعالی

Channel

علیرضا متعالی

@matali1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,737subscribers

+30,966 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233382346
TypeChannel
Username@matali1
Descriptionلینک ناشناس: t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=31871864
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/matali1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,77149,73734,2549 August 2026 — 18,771 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,778 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,088 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,479 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,367 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,010 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,394 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,663 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,753 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,868 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,942 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,972 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,822 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,004 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,072 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,207 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,412 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,535 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,607 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,720 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,757 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,849 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,967 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,022 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,041 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,145 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,751 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,999 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,033 subscribers16 September 2026 — 27,719 subscribers19 September 2026 — 27,970 subscribers25 September 2026 — 34,181 subscribers4 October 2026 — 34,425 subscribers8 October 2026 — 35,312 subscribers13 October 2026 — 36,042 subscribers14 October 2026 — 36,203 subscribers15 October 2026 — 40,335 subscribers16 October 2026 — 44,977 subscribers17 October 2026 — 47,043 subscribers18 October 2026 — 47,967 subscribers19 October 2026 — 48,999 subscribers21 October 2026 — 49,448 subscribers22 October 2026 — 49,737 subscribers9 August 202622 October 2026
43 measurements spanning 74 days, net +30,966. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,126–54,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 06:3749,737+289
21 Oct 2026, 00:3049,448+449
19 Oct 2026, 20:3748,999+1,032
18 Oct 2026, 19:3747,967+924
17 Oct 2026, 20:4447,043+2,066
16 Oct 2026, 17:1844,977+4,642
15 Oct 2026, 14:1040,335+4,132
14 Oct 2026, 11:2636,203+161
13 Oct 2026, 01:0636,042+730
8 Oct 2026, 15:5935,312+887
4 Oct 2026, 02:5834,425+244
25 Sept 2026, 10:0034,181+6,211
19 Sept 2026, 02:1727,970+251
16 Sept 2026, 14:2027,719+686
14 Sept 2026, 18:0127,033+34
13 Sept 2026, 02:3926,999+248
11 Sept 2026, 03:0126,751+1,606
8 Sept 2026, 06:4125,145+104
5 Sept 2026, 03:1725,041+19
3 Sept 2026, 11:3825,022first reading

Engagement

535 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 49,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
266 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
267
of 535 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held535 (4 August 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total3,029,480
Reactions total131,848
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 02:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,040
Videos
≈160
Links
≈147

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 59s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

238,642 reactions across 531 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣104,67143.9%
❤69,26129.0%
🔥17,7447.44%
👍17,5557.36%
👎4,9502.07%
🤡3,0631.28%
😭2,7511.15%
❤‍🔥2,4441.02%
💔2,3050.966%
🤩1,9830.831%
🌭1,8910.792%
🍌1,8850.79%
😱9350.392%
😨8580.36%
👻6370.267%
👌5310.223%
🤯4390.184%
🤷‍♂4270.179%
🗿3940.165%
👀2980.125%
34 further kinds3,6201.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 531 of the 535 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238,642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 535 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
267
across the posts below
Posts paid on
65
of 531 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @matali1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 535 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 21:21 UTC≈2,590 views256 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣223💯20❤8🌭2🤩2🔥1

21 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈10,800 views1,193 reactionsread 23 October 2026

شایعه‌ست ۳۰ مهر روز دختر بعدیه

🤣1,060👍64💅37🤔22🔥6💯4

21 Oct 2026, 13:52 UTC≈11,900 views1,194 reactionsread 23 October 2026

جدی ۳۰ مهر روز پسره؟

🤣743👍268👎113🤷‍♀57🤩8😭5

21 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC≈12,800 views507 reactionsread 23 October 2026

قشنگ فرق دیت پولداری و دیت ناپولداریه👍🏽

🤣465🌭16❤11🤩7🤡6🔥2

21 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC≈13,000 views324 reactionsread 23 October 2026

برید رای بدید ببینم کی برنده شد👀

❤308🔥8🌭4🍌3🤓1

21 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈13,000 views348 reactionsread 23 October 2026

ویدیو آپلود شد عشقای من💞👨🏻‍❤️‍👨🏾

❤317🤣16🔥9🌭3🍌3

21 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC≈15,900 views255 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤209🤣37🔥4🍌3💅2

Signed ILI

21 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC≈12,600 views469 reactionsread 23 October 2026

بچه ها میخواییم توی ویدیو امروز رای گیری کنیم خب؟؟؟ که از بین من و حامی کی دیت بهتری میره😂 اونایی که میگن منو یکتا ویدیو رو لایک کنن👍🏽 و اونایی که میگن حامی و الینا دیت بهتری رفتن برای ویدیو کامنت بزارن📝 ساعت ۲ یوتوب باشید عشقای من🩵

❤333👍112🤣22🌭1🤓1

21 Oct 2026, 09:54 UTC≈11,900 views381 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤195🤣182🤓4

20 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC≈12,900 views514 reactionsread 23 October 2026

به نظرتون کی دیت بهتری میره؟👨🏻‍❤️‍👨🏾

🤣441❤44🤪21🌭3😁3🤡2

20 Oct 2026, 17:27 UTC≈16,500 views636 reactions11 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

قاب چهارتاییمون🥲 چهارشنبه افسانه‌ای ساعت ۲🫶🏻

❤565💘30🤣15🌭10💋9❤‍🔥7

20 Oct 2026, 17:17 UTC≈12,700 views214 reactionsread 23 October 2026

این سرعتش خیلی میزونه من برای استریم و آپلود ازش استفاده میکنم

👍183❤18🤣8🤝3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 535 posts we hold for @matali1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTCAnonymous Poll6,850 voters approx.

ساعت چند بزارم فردا؟

  1. ۲69%
  2. ۳37%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 535 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,628,558
#1
ALIZELZELE
@alizelzelee · 29,302
#2
MKART
@mkartworkam · 965
#3
پروکسی Proxy
@proxy_qavi · 3,298,410
#4
Mary on a Cross
@iholymaryat70 · 13,324
#5
KHOTAN
@khotaaan · 32,195
#6
Ali Geramy
@aligeramy · 49,542
#7
Matarzak
@matarzzak · 35,462
#8
MARIZ MEDI
@MARIZMEDIA · 55,275
#9
Matrix Show
@showmatrix · 19,362
#10
سد روسکی
@SeD_Ruski · 2,910
#11
ASHNA
@RAPASHNA · 16,529
#12
Vinak
@VinakOfficial1 · 86,051
#13
Hami KM
@hamikm · 28,551
#14
بنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 224,316
#15
PooriaPutaK
@putakk · 221,395
#16
علیض
@Aliztory · 164,121
#17
Reza Ayeene🪞
@rezaayeenetg · 21,877
#18
افشایدرمن
@afshartikk · 134,318
#19
سهیل سلبا
@solbasoheil · 128,131
#20
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 320,091
#21
هادی هایروکس
@Hadihyrox1 · 21,046
#22
SOGANG🕊️
@sogangyt · 84,014
#23
Rap King
@rapking · 309,876
#24
مانیکس
@ManixVid · 100,280
#25
Ali Zodiac
@alizodiac · 14,345
#26
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,954,603
#27
Amir Mo | امیرمو
@ITSAMIRMO · 31,237
#28
سم اسنو
@Samsnowww · 21,969
#29
SECSHOT
@SEC_SHOT · 10,836
#30
MEMENTO STUDIOS
@MEMENTOSTUDIOS · 130,535
#31
RapCity
@rapcity · 82,227
#32
ARIA KEOXER
@KeoXer · 48,751
#33
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,493,696
#34
⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️
@mahdiabshahi · 51,210
#35
⚽️ بیست و دو | Bistodo
@bistodo · 388,046
#36
Vigiato | ویجیاتو
@vigiatonet · 83,509
#37
Pouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 61,883
#38
Meshki
@MeshkiOrg · 22,079
#39
Tekido👀Life
@tekidolife · 225,620
#40
RaaSaa
@RaaSaa · 7,835
#41
بارسا | بارسلونا | Barca
@Barca_We · 305,915
#42
AmirEyZed 🍌
@amireyzed · 44,865
#43
Sajad Shahi
@sajshah · 99,200
#44
گیف و استیکر | gifkoshr
@gifkoshr · 76,532
#45
RapTV
@raptv · 383,575
#46
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 250,477
#47
FORTNITE BR | فورتنایت بی آر
@Fortnite_Br · 37,193
#48
AnimotionArt | انیموشن آرت
@animotionart · 494,311
#49
بوگی لند
@BogyTVTelegram · 4,361
#50
اخبار جنگ | توییت خبری
@tweet_Khabari · 621,409
#51
Tijay
@tijayamin · 75,020
#52
Soalk
@soallk1 · 15,120
#53
Meme Zone | میم زون
@MEMEZ0NE · 113,673
#54
HesamTiem
@hesamtiemchannel · 76,376
#55
Emico 🧑🏻‍🚀
@amiremico · 2,403
#56
Z RAP | زد رپ
@zZRap · 60,898
#57
عمو تئوری
@TheoAmoory · 64,563
#58
Amirali's otagh
@Amirali_mrt · 4,653
#59
Pixie Farnaz
@pixieFarnaz · 2,095
#60
[ Godpoori News ]
@GodPoori_News · 2,155
#61
Mr Feshar | مستر فشار
@mr_feshar · 12,872
#62
SE7EN
@ff_se7en · 17,670
#63
🎮 EAFC27 | FC27 🎮
@EAFC_PRIME · 1,796,724
#64
Eddie's Playlist
@Eddieplaylist · 4,541
#65
Erfan Paydar
@erfanpaydartelegram · 12,042
#66
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid C.F
@RealMadridTweet · 201,967
#67
̷𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘕𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬
@winkelnetwork · 524
#68
متین سجادی | بازاریابی و فروش 💎
@matin_sajadiiiii · 4,455
#69
مــیــثــاقسسچ | Misaghsch
@Misaghsch1 · 13,124
#70
HipSoccer | هیپ ساکر
@HipSoccer · 3,581
#71
ShayanKG🎮
@shayan_KG · 2,121
#72
Kouman | کومان
@Koumani · 104,220
#73
الکلاسیکو | فوتبال فان
@futbadfun · 157,493
#74
AmirExcite
@AmirExcite · 737
#75
Trap Farsi
@TrapeFarsi · 47,683
#76
𝐓𝐎𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐃𝐒𝐆𝐍🪁
@toonidsgn · 933
#77
Go Fuck.
@xGoFuck · 10,235
#78
RapCity World
@RapCityWorld · 26,637
#79

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hami KM
@hamikm · 28,551
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 September 2026
KHOTAN
@khotaaan · 32,195
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
Tekido👀Life
@tekidolife · 225,620
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
بنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 224,316
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
سهیل سلبا
@solbasoheil · 128,131
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علیرضا متعالی” (@matali1), 49,737 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matali1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.