28 measurements spanning 30 days, net -621. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,130–43,937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 13:40
43,223
-51
4 Sept 2026, 05:01
43,274
-40
2 Sept 2026, 16:06
43,314
-13
1 Sept 2026, 12:44
43,327
-11
31 Aug 2026, 14:55
43,338
-15
30 Aug 2026, 17:27
43,353
-28
29 Aug 2026, 20:34
43,381
-33
28 Aug 2026, 18:06
43,414
-18
27 Aug 2026, 19:23
43,432
-18
26 Aug 2026, 16:23
43,450
-27
25 Aug 2026, 13:02
43,477
-9
24 Aug 2026, 14:33
43,486
-40
22 Aug 2026, 21:45
43,526
-39
21 Aug 2026, 12:18
43,565
-27
20 Aug 2026, 15:23
43,592
-18
19 Aug 2026, 15:36
43,610
-16
18 Aug 2026, 14:15
43,626
-33
17 Aug 2026, 14:06
43,659
-32
16 Aug 2026, 06:16
43,691
-19
14 Aug 2026, 19:08
43,710
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.95%
avg views ÷ 43,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
32 (23 June 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
39,035
Reactions total
916
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 11:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,640
Videos
≈47
Links
≈568
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,521 reactions across 32 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,881
53.4%
🔥
638
18.1%
❤🔥
373
10.6%
👍
300
8.52%
💯
246
6.99%
👌
46
1.31%
custom 5451612816425372869
37
1.05%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 32 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MariaSternAstrology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Телец и Весы: чей вклад дороже?
У Тельца и Весов своя кондитерская. Перед запуском нового торта Телец несколько раз меняет начинку: уменьшает сладость крема, добавляет кислинку, проверяет, пропитался ли бисквит. Покупатели вполне могут оставить торт до завтра, и завтра он тоже должен быть вкусным.
Весы готовят съёмку. Подбирают тарелку, фон, ленту для коробки. Убирают из кадра случайную ложку. Смотрят на готовый то…
Что происходит, когда в профессиональной сфере встречаются Рак и Лев, а человек проявляется через Весы?
Асцендент в Весах постоянно учитывает другого: правильно ли меня поняли, приемлемо ли я выгляжу, не вызовет ли моё решение конфликт?
Раку в десятом доме важно чувствовать себя в безопасности и сохранять хорошие отношения с руководителем. А включённый Лев хочет признания: показать свой результат, быть увиденной.
…
Первое место досталось другой
Серебряная медаль ударилась о флакон с лаком и упала на дно спортивной сумки.
— Ты чего? — спросила мама.
— Ничего. Больше не пойду.
Утром одиннадцатилетняя Лера мечтала попасть на первенство. Днём неудачно приземлилась во время программы с мячом, подвернула стопу, поднялась и закончила выступление. Вечером получила второе место и решила бросить гимнастику.
Почему одно серебро перече…
Как пользоваться AstroTarget
Я записала подробную инструкцию по AstroTarget, бесплатному астрологическому сервису.
За 37 минут показываю весь путь: от ввода данных и построения натальной карты до соляра, лунара, транзитов, прогрессий и дирекций. Разбираю таблицы, фильтры, датировки, выгрузку в PDF и Excel, лунный календарь, справочник, Звезду магов и Древо Сефирот.
Если вы уже заходили на сайт, но не успели разобр…
На канале «Астрология в деталях» вышел прогноз на сентябрь
В выпуске разбираем, что важно знать, к чему готовиться и на что обратить внимание.
Слушайте удобным способом:
✉️ ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/astrotarget?w=donut_payment-146615366&levelId=3473
🚀 Telegram: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=se8e
Злата узнала, что является ценным сотрудником, только после заявления об увольнении. До этого она проработала почти год, не получая никакой обратной связи.
На следующей работе история повторилась: успешные проекты есть, но похвалы нет. И тогда чужое молчание превращается в вывод: «Наверное, я здесь бесполезна и меня легко заменить».
Почему человеку недостаточно увидеть результат своей работы? Почему он ждёт, что др…
Первый выходной Козерога и Девы продержался до 12:12
В 12:12 Артём выдвинул нижний ящик с аккумуляторами. Ячейка для Samsung A52 была пуста.
У стойки ждала девушка, которая записалась на замену батареи ещё в четверг. В программе числилась одна деталь. Последнюю Илья поставил накануне вечером, а расход забыл провести.
Артём проверил шкаф, коробки с текущими заказами и полку с возвратами. Потом позвонил поставщику и…
Вместо поиска клиентов вы покупаете очередной курс.
Екатерина хочет заниматься психологическим консультированием. Знакомые уже обращаются к ней за советом и благодарят за помощь. Назвать себя консультантом, озвучить цену и начать искать клиентов ей трудно.
Она пишет несколько постов в Telegram. Канал не растёт, новых подписчиков нет. Цифры канала Екатерина принимает за оценку своих способностей. Следующим шагом ста…
Сколько стоит не поссориться с клиентом? Бизнес Весы и Скорпион
Коля — Весы и электрик. Дополнительно он принимает заявки, ездит на замеры, составляет сметы и общается с заказчиками.
Дима — Скорпион, плиточник и бригадир. Он ведёт объект, проверяет работу мастеров и отвечает за качество ремонта.
Марина попросила полностью переделать ванную и закончить до двадцатого числа. На момент замера старый кафель ещё оставал…
Что на самом деле скрывается за вашими сомнениями
Купили вещь и уже на следующий день снова читаете отзывы?
Сравниваете варианты, хотя деньги заплачены и решение принято? Ищете доказательства, что точно не ошиблись?
Именно с этим запросом пришла Дарья. Она выбрала машину вместо дальнейшего накопления на квартиру, но после подписания договора начала заново спорить со своим решением.
В новом открытом разборе выясня…
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @MariaSternAstrology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Pro Astro Катерины Кручинкиной @astrolog_kruchinkina · 69,883 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Астрология с Катериной Дятловой (katrin.dia) в 11 Доме @katrin_dya · 41,322 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Астрология с Ермолиной Татьяной @ermolinaastrolog · 45,787 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Астролог Павел Андреев @mylablife · 100,112 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
PlanetaZemlya @planetazemlyaastro · 64,292 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
Оксана Лозан @AstroLozan · 30,499 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
⭐️Астролог Ирина Чайка @astro_chayka · 55,659 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Константин Дараган 🔶 Комментарий астролога️ @daragan_konstantin · 209,158 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Василиса Володина @vasilisavolodina_official · 135,982 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Angela Pearl Astrology Tarot @angelapearl_astrology · 53,544 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Астролог Вера Хубелашвили ️ @astrolog_vera · 34,666 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Карты таро 🔮 с Анастасией Лыковой @lykova_taro · 103,915 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Шустина Евгения | Астрология @neoby4nyi_astrolog_shustina · 34,311 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Штерн • Астрология в тренде” (@MariaSternAstrology), 43,223 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MariaSternAstrology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.