28 measurements spanning 30 days, net -10,066. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,753–55,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 21:56
44,263
-93
3 Sept 2026, 21:18
44,356
-74
2 Sept 2026, 10:26
44,430
-121
1 Sept 2026, 07:46
44,551
-122
31 Aug 2026, 04:12
44,673
-50
30 Aug 2026, 04:19
44,723
-127
29 Aug 2026, 01:47
44,850
-268
27 Aug 2026, 22:46
45,118
-389
26 Aug 2026, 20:03
45,507
-293
25 Aug 2026, 22:03
45,800
-48
24 Aug 2026, 19:57
45,848
-60
23 Aug 2026, 07:36
45,908
-672
21 Aug 2026, 16:49
46,580
+621
20 Aug 2026, 17:54
45,959
-19
19 Aug 2026, 18:09
45,978
-79
18 Aug 2026, 18:52
46,057
-471
17 Aug 2026, 18:43
46,528
-261
16 Aug 2026, 18:08
46,789
-330
15 Aug 2026, 02:35
47,119
-2,237
13 Aug 2026, 17:36
49,356
first reading
Engagement
210 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 44,263 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,200
176 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
179
of 210 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held
210 (5 August 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Views total
3,028,800
Reactions total
393,606
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
305
Videos
19
Links
39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
490,236 reactions across 207 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
251,875
51.4%
❤
238,361
48.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 210 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 490,236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 210 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 CHÍNH THỨC HỢP TÁC CÙNG EXNESS 😈
Từ hôm nay, anh em nào tạo mới tài khoản Exness qua LINK của mình và hoàn tất đăng ký theo điều kiện chương trình sẽ được:
🎁 NHẬN NGAY 10 USDT TIỀN MẶT
✅ Tài khoản tạo mới
✅ Đăng ký đúng link giới thiệu
✅ Hoàn tất xác minh theo yêu cầu
😈 https://one.exnessonelink.com/a/b3u90s7jlm
Mã giới thiệu: b3u90s7jlm
✅ Hoàn tất đăng ký KYC + Nạp tối thiểu 99$
Số lượng ưu đãi có hạn, anh …
BTC Update 07/09/2026
Xu hướng: Đang chuyển dần sang giảm.
Hôm nay BTC đang đấu giá ở vùng thấp hơn hôm qua, cho thấy bên bán bắt đầu chiếm ưu thế. Nếu giá phá đáy 78,900, khả năng xuất hiện một nhịp giảm mạnh sẽ cao hơn.
Kịch bản chính
- Phá 78,900 → xác nhận áp lực giảm, giá có thể rơi nhanh.
- Supply lớn quanh 80,500 → chừng nào vùng này còn giữ, BTC chưa thể xác nhận tăng lại.
- Lấy lại 80,500 → cấu trúc giảm …
#btcinsider__ báo cáo rằng tin tặc dường như đã lừa các nhân viên chức năng của Liquid phê duyệt một giao dịch trông hợp lệ đối với hệ thống của họ nhưng cho phép rút peg-out khoảng 3.998 #BTC sang mạng Bitcoin.
Nói cách khác, tin tặc đã tạo ra một giao dịch vượt qua các kiểm tra của Liquid, khiến phần cứng bảo mật của các nhân viên chức năng ký duyệt việc rút tiền.
Tin tặc tuyên bố họ là whitehat.
#Bitcoin ngày càng giao dịch giống như vàng kỹ thuật số, theo André Dragosch của Bitwise, với mối tương quan của nó đối với vàng đạt mức cao nhất trong sáu năm.
BTC Update 04/09/2026
Xu hướng: Tăng mạnh trên nhiều khung thời gian.
BTC hôm nay tiếp tục đấu giá ở vùng giá cao hơn hôm qua, cho thấy bên mua vẫn đang chiếm ưu thế. Nếu giá phá qua 81,400, đà tăng có thể tiếp tục mở rộng mạnh hơn.
Kịch bản chính
- Phá và giữ trên 81,400 → xác nhận tiếp diễn xu hướng tăng.
- Target gần nhất → vùng 82,000.
- Không vượt được 81,400 → giá có thể quay lại tích lũy hoặc điều chỉnh ngắn…
Nếu bỏ 1.000 USD vào các tài sản này từ 15 năm trước và giữ đến hôm nay, số tiền có thể trở thành:
🪙Bitcoin: ~8,97 triệu USD
🟢 NVIDIA: ~735.000 USD
🚗 Tesla: ~231.000 USD
🍎 Apple: ~29.000 USD
📈 S&P 500: ~8.400 USD
🥇 Vàng: ~2.150 USD
15 năm nhìn lại mới thấy…
Khác biệt không chỉ nằm ở việc “có đầu tư hay không”, mà còn nằm ở việc bạn đã chọn đầu tư vào đâu và có đủ kiên nhẫn để nắm giữ hay không. 🥹📈
Thời gian có th…
Sở Đúc tiền Mỹ ra mắt đồng xu 1 đô la có hình Donald Trump, vị tổng thống đương nhiệm đầu tiên trên đồng xu lưu hành của Mỹ.
👉 Toại nguyện rồi giờ lo làm kinh tế được rồi đó 🤣
👍1,740
Showing the 12 most recent of 210 posts we hold for @MegaLodonFutures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MegaLodonFutures edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BD Ventures Channel @bd_ventures · 30,366 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 7 September 2026
HC Tradecoin | Channel @hctradecoin_channel · 34,883 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Rich Kid Trading @Richkidtradings · 90,461 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
Margin Broadcast | TradeCoinVN @margintradingTCVN · 56,099 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
5 Phút Crypto | Channel @Fivemincryptoann · 58,678 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Tin nhanh - 369 @coin369channel · 32,261 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
HC CAPITAL | Channel @HCCapital_Channel · 65,686 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
A1Academy @A1Aofficial · 36,407 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
ThuanCapital @ThuanCapital · 90,728 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
Kahramanov | Crypto 📈 @kahramanov_trader · 58,439 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
HashSeer @HashSeerHQ · 174,420 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Đồng Đội CRYPTO - Channel @dongdoicrypto · 35,108 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Binance Futures Liquidations @BinanceLiquidations · 181,760 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Trade Coin Underground @tradecoinundergroundchannel · 71,670 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
WhalePump Reborn : Best signals! ( 100% Free ) @WhalePumpsReborn · 41,918 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Hunter Gem @Hunter_Gem · 30,379 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
Trade Coin Chiến Lược @TradeCoinChienLuoc · 41,304 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Jess Tản Mạn @Jesstraining · 49,936 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
BINANCE FUTURE CRYPTO TRADING @Crypto_Future_Free_Signals_Tradi · 44,218 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 19 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MegaLodon Futures” (@MegaLodonFutures), 44,263 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MegaLodonFutures.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.