Кто такой банкрот? В Судный день человек придёт с огромными благодеяниями, но при жизни он оскорбил одного и за спиной обсуждал другого. Один возьмёт часть его благих дел, другой возьмёт ещё, третий возьмёт ещё, и благие дела закончатся. Его жизнь прошла в издёвках и насмешках над другими, и за это оскорблённые присвоят себе его благие дела, а если они закончатся, то возьмут их грехи и возложат на него, после чего е…

Channel
Мухаммад ибн Галиб аль-Умари
@MuhammadGalib
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,354subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001077434543 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MuhammadGalib |
| Created | 4 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MuhammadGalib |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:46 | 6,354 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:00 | 6,353 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 6,356 | +8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 6,348 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 6,355 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 6,361 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 6,364 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 6,371 | +7 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 6,364 | -10 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 6,374 | -6 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 6,380 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 6,379 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 6,384 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 6,391 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 6,386 | +11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 6,375 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 6,368 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 6,371 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 6,376 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 6,374 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 42.4%
- avg views ÷ 6,354 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,700
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (28 February 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,087 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10m 50s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
File, posted without a caption
«Терроризм останется терроризмом во всех своих проявлениях, где бы и в какой стране он ни существовал. Пока его идейные источники продолжают существовать, а его центры остаются открытыми, он будет и впредь оказывать влияние и причинять вред. Чтобы искоренить терроризм, необходимо устранить его корни, опровергая его заблуждения и ложные доводы с опорой на достоверные шариатские знания. О Аллах, храни Иорданию Своей…
Одна из форм насмешек Одной из форм насмешек являются оскорбления, которые бывают разными. Сюда относится то, когда о ком-то в качестве оскорбления отзываются как о хромом, слепом, низком и тому подобными выражениями. Когда упоминают кого-нибудь, один говорит: «Да, знаю этого невысокого, они все такие-то», – или: «Да, высокий и тупой», – или: «Высокий как пальма, тупой как…», – и прочие неподобающие выражения. Все э…
File, posted without a caption
Что нужно говорить при виде беды Что нужно говорить, когда ты видишь человека с недостатком или в беде? Скажи: الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي عَافَانِي مِمَّا ابْتَلَاهُ بِهِ، وَفَضَّلَنِي عَلَى كَثِيرٍ مِمَّنْ خَلَقَ تَفْضِيلًا [Аль-хамду лилляхиллязи ‘афани мимма-бталяху бихи, ва фаддаляни ‘аля кясирин мимман халяка тафдыля.] «Хвала Аллаху, Который обезопасил меня от того, чем испытал его, и предпочёл …
File, posted without a caption
«Каждый навык, обладатель которого использовал его для распространения добра, — причина получения награды и возвышения степеней [перед Господом. Это касается] редакции видео, аудио, карточек и т. п. в целях призыва. Так не утомляйся и не пренебрегай даже самым малым деянием. Ведь ты не знаешь, которое из твоих дел станет полезным тебе перед твоим Владыкой. Продолжай, ведь самое любимое дело [перед Всевышним] — то, в…
Не насмехайся ни над кем Куртуби (да помилует его Аллах) в своём толковании пишет полезные слова: «В целом, никто не должен сметь насмехаться над встреченным, если тот покажется ему нищим, то есть в изношенной одежде, с изношенными вещами или на старом автомобиле, или изувеченным, то есть больным, или неуклюжим в речи. Возможно, его сердце чище и искреннее, чем у того, кто этими качествами не обладает, и тогда насм…
File, posted without a caption
Будь ключом к благу Каждый должен прикладывать все усилия, чтобы быть ключом к благу. Что это значит? Это значит быть тем, посредством кого Аллах приносит пользу остальным. Пророк ﷺ сказал: «Среди людей есть ключи к благому и замки для дурного, и среди людей есть ключи для дурного и замки для благого». Если Аллах сделал тебя ключом для благого и полезным для людей будь то через примирение, обучение, призыв к благому…
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @MuhammadGalib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@raminmutallim · 19,859
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
@dr_elbukhary · 37,571
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
@Arafatbinhassan · 29,496
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
@Miraathalanbeyaa · 23,782
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мухаммад ибн Галиб аль-Умари” (@MuhammadGalib), 6,354 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MuhammadGalib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.