Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рамин Муталлим

Channel

Рамин Муталлим

@raminmutallim

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,914subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001159972708
TypeChannel
Username@raminmutallim
Created17 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/raminmutallim

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

19,86019,91419,8876 August 2026 — 19,860 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,860 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,865 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,863 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,862 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,863 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,862 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,861 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,870 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,875 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,871 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,879 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,882 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,872 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,873 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,880 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,885 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,886 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,889 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,886 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,869 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,872 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,888 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,893 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,902 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,901 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,891 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,894 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,903 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,909 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,907 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,914 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,852–19,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:3819,914+7
15 Sept 2026, 05:1819,907-2
13 Sept 2026, 13:0119,909+6
11 Sept 2026, 21:0119,903+9
9 Sept 2026, 08:1619,894+3
6 Sept 2026, 01:2019,891-10
4 Sept 2026, 00:2019,901-1
2 Sept 2026, 15:5619,902+9
1 Sept 2026, 16:5519,893+5
31 Aug 2026, 14:4419,888+16
30 Aug 2026, 15:1819,872+3
29 Aug 2026, 15:1619,869-17
28 Aug 2026, 14:4219,886-3
26 Aug 2026, 21:0319,889+3
25 Aug 2026, 22:0519,886+1
25 Aug 2026, 01:2319,885+5
23 Aug 2026, 16:2819,880+7
22 Aug 2026, 04:0819,873+1
20 Aug 2026, 19:2519,872-10
19 Aug 2026, 17:4319,882first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 19,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,060
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held95 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total110,100
Reactions total881
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 51m
Average length
5m 24s

Measured directly from 54 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,813 reactions across 95 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,28081.1%
💯2669.46%
1816.43%
🤝863.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,813 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 95 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raminmutallim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,400 views54 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآنَ أَمْ عَلَىٰ قُلُوبٍ أَقْفَالُهَا ﴿٢٤﴾ «Неужели они не размышляют над Кораном, или на их сердцах замки?!» (Коран 47:24). ✍️ Рамин Муталлим #коран #духовное #воспитание

👍32💯193

2 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,320 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Что такое ширк? 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtube.com/shorts/vfankHyKK8s #ширк #многобожие #мольба #дуа #поклонение

👍21💯2

1 Sept 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,330 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Отдаление от Ислама ожесточает сердца 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtube.com/shorts/sbrckDDwTWI #грехи #духовное #убийства #смута

👍15💯9🤝1

1 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,130 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fighmuyassarFile

44. Найденная вещь t.me/fighmuyassar

👍10

1 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,250 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fighmuyassarVideo

44. Найденная вещь https://youtu.be/EOyt8aGeLPY

👍7

1 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,110 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fighmuyassar

📖 Перевод и разъяснение книги «Упрощенный фикх в свете Корана и Сунны» 📌 РАЗДЕЛ ТОРГОВЛИ 📹 44. Найденная вещь 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtu.be/EOyt8aGeLPY #находка #финансы #стадо #имущество #права #время

👍4

31 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,670 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

В доисламский период дочерей закапывали заживо. А сегодня? 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtube.com/shorts/HbBvj9lS4CA #дети #аборт #убийства #грехи

💯14👍123

31 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈3,590 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Можно ли проверять телефон жены? 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtube.com/shorts/RwhMQ0NoTLM #семья #нрав #права #воспитание

👍32💯5

30 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈3,050 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

📹 Как совершать Иша (ночной) намаз https://youtu.be/kisobvb7O7g

👍31

30 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈3,670 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📹 Как совершать Иша (ночной) намаз 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtu.be/kisobvb7O7g #обучение #иша #намаз

👍26

30 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈3,180 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📹 Как совершать Аср (послеполуденный) намаз 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtu.be/b8AF6zKg2tA #обучение #аср #намаз

👍23

30 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈3,390 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📹 Как совершать Фаджр (утренний) намаз 🎙 Рамин Муталлим https://youtu.be/jEfLVVcw7Xs #обучение #фаджр #намаз

👍28

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @raminmutallim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@raminmutallim edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة فضيلة الشيخ أ.د. عبد الله البخاري
@dr_elbukhary · 37,476
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
عرفات بن حسن المحمدي
@Arafatbinhassan · 29,604
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
قناة ميراث الأنبياء
@Miraathalanbeyaa · 23,684
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рамин Муталлим” (@raminmutallim), 19,914 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raminmutallim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.