Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 80 days, net +5,342. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,095–76,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 00:11
69,507
-273
26 Oct 2026, 01:27
69,780
-207
25 Oct 2026, 04:06
69,987
-264
24 Oct 2026, 03:30
70,251
-274
23 Oct 2026, 00:16
70,525
-358
22 Oct 2026, 00:10
70,883
-401
20 Oct 2026, 16:50
71,284
-540
19 Oct 2026, 14:56
71,824
-477
18 Oct 2026, 11:28
72,301
-251
17 Oct 2026, 13:05
72,552
-181
16 Oct 2026, 16:21
72,733
-554
15 Oct 2026, 15:38
73,287
-426
14 Oct 2026, 17:04
73,713
-737
13 Oct 2026, 10:06
74,450
+1,620
9 Oct 2026, 04:58
72,830
+2,938
4 Oct 2026, 17:57
69,892
+6,678
26 Sept 2026, 17:37
63,214
+2,986
19 Sept 2026, 12:57
60,228
-276
17 Sept 2026, 04:01
60,504
-176
15 Sept 2026, 01:40
60,680
first reading
Engagement
493 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.85%
avg views ÷ 69,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,680
191 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.399%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
202
of 493 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 180 of 191 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
493 (4 August 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
511,029
Reactions total
1,986
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 10:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
427
Videos
85
Links
47
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
43h 06m
Average length
25m 37s
Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,907 reactions across 447 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,445
49.8%
🔥
798
16.3%
👍
542
11.0%
🏆
325
6.62%
🆒
292
5.95%
❤🔥
170
3.46%
⚡
164
3.34%
🙏
25
0.509%
🕊
24
0.489%
✍
23
0.469%
🐳
22
0.448%
🤩
21
0.428%
🤝
18
0.367%
💯
10
0.204%
😇
8
0.163%
😍
7
0.143%
🥰
6
0.122%
🫡
6
0.122%
🎅
1
0.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 449 of the 493 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,907 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 493 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 472 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MultilevelMokhida. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 493 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ustozangiz Mokhida Khakimova tomonidan tashkil etilayotgan Multi-level kursi haqida toʻliq maʼlumot ✅
➡️ Jonli Darslar:
Kursimiz davomiyligi 30 kun, lekin sizga 60 ta Jonli Dars oʻtib beraman. Jonli darslar har kuni 2 mahal boʻladi. 1-jonli darsimiz amaliy soat 14:00 da boʻladi. 2-jonli darsimiz esa mock test tahlili soat 20:00 da boʻladi. Yodda tuting, hech kim sizga mendek shuncha vaqtini ajratib kuniga 2 marta jo…
⭐️ GENERAL ENGLISH 1.0 KURSIMIZGA QABUL OCHILDI
✅ Jonli Darslar: Kursimiz davomiyligi 40 kun va sizga har kuni, umumiy 40 ta Jonli Dars boʻladi. Vaqti soat: 19:00 da.
✅ Video Darsliklar & Vazifalar: 40 kun davomida sizga har kuni ertalab soat 10:00 da nazariy video darsliklar va kunlik topshiriqlar berib boriladi.
✅ Kurs kimlar uchun: Multi-level imtihonida 44 va undan past ball olganlar va noldan boshlab oʻrganmo…
2024-yil Multi-level | 1-Database ✅
➡️ Bu yerda Multi-level imtihoniga tayyorgarlik koʻrayotgan oʻquvchilar uchun men ustozangiz Mokhida Khakimova tomonidan imtihonda haqiqiy tushgan listening va reading savollari va ularga audio tushuntirishlar berganman..!
➡️ Bu savollar yana tushib berishi mumkin. Koʻrib qoʻygan yaxshi baribir. Sertifikat olganingizda nasib quvonib ustoz B2 & C1 oldim deb quvonib yozish nasib qi…
♥️ ARTICLE 1 - IVORY - B1 LEVEL
➡️ Ingliz tilida maqolalar oʻqish va ularning ichidan chiqqan lugʻatlarni yod olish reading comprehension, yaʼni oʻqib tushunish qobiliyatini rivojlantirishga juda katta yordam beradi.
➡️ Men sizga 30 kun davomida B1 darajadagi maqolalar va ularning lugʻatlarini berib boraman. Ishoning, har kuni maqola oʻqish bu sabr-toqat talab qiladigan, lekin reading skills uchun juda foydali mash…
✅ Toʻlov qilishingiz uchun karta raqam
9860120186029746 (Mokhida Khakimova nomida)
Toʻlov qilgach, ism-familiya va chek yuboring. Hozirda kursning chegirma narxi 399.000 UZS (asl narxi 449.000 UZS)
✅ Yana 23 ta joy qoldi. 26-oktabrda 1-dars. Bugun esa Intro Lesson.
🟥 44 va undan past ball olganlar hammasi General English oʻqishi shart.
⭐️ GENERAL ENGLISH 1.0 KURSIMIZGA QABUL OCHILDI
✅ Jonli Darslar: Kursimiz davomiyligi 40 kun va sizga har kuni, umumiy 40 ta Jonli Dars boʻladi. Vaqti soat: 19:00 da.
✅ Video Darsliklar & Vazifalar: 40 kun davomida sizga har kuni ertalab soat 10:00 da nazariy video darsliklar va kunlik topshiriqlar berib boriladi.
✅ Kurs kimlar uchun: Multi-level imtihonida 44 va undan past ball olganlar va noldan boshlab oʻrganmo…
Shablonchi kandidat dardi...
Shablon ila C1 istar har kishi,
Mavzu kelgach, lol qolur aqli-hushi.
Moreover deb ochsa har bir kalom,
B1 kelsa - der: "Bu qandayin alam!"
Ustozangiz Mokhidadan shablonchi ustalarga hajviy she’r 🧑🎓
🌐 Join: @MultilevelMokhida
❤19🔥7✍4💯3🏆1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 493 posts we hold for @MultilevelMokhida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MultilevelMokhida edited 24 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 October 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❔ Ayni paytda, Ingliz tilini bilish darajangiz qanday..?
Beginner (A1)7%
Elementary (A2)8%
Pre-intermediate (B1)35%
Intermediate (B2) - IELTS 5.5 - 6.538%
Advanced (C1) - IELTS 7.0 - 8.07%
Proficiency (C2) - IELTS 8.5 - 9.05%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 493 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Multilevel Mock C1 Achiever @multilevel_mock_C1_achiever · 27,823 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Abror Rahmatullayev @AbrorRahmatullayev · 141,376 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
MULTILEVEL ZONE @Multilevel_zone · 212,123 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 25 August 2026
Multilevel Listening C1 Achiever @multilevel_listening_practice · 65,523 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
MULTILEVEL (CEFR) FREE MOCK @MULTILEVELlllll · 101,933 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Recent MultiLevel @RecentMultiLevel · 26,651 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
Teacher_Muzaffar @multileveltest · 24,384 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
𝙄𝙀𝙇𝙏𝙎 & 𝘾𝙀𝙁𝙍 𝙎𝙀𝘾𝙍𝙀𝙏𝙎 🇬🇧🇺🇿 @IELTS_CEFR_SECRETS · 25,427 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 September 2026
Teacher Nozimjon | Multilevel @Nozimjonsblog · 23,823 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
CefrWithDemo @cefrwithdemo · 24,087 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Multi-Level Record (C2 Level Teacher) @MultiLevelRecord · 210,969 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Multilevel Master Audios @Multilevel_Listening_Audios · 21,197 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
MULTILEVEL(CEFR) FULL MOCKS✨ @Freefullmock · 26,826 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
Multilevel Master Mock Tests @multilevelmastermock · 47,586 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
English worksheets @english_worksheets_more · 36,762 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
Rustambek oqıw orayı. Matematika milliy sertifikat @rustambek_oqiw_orayi · 62,535 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Multilevel Mokhida” (@MultilevelMokhida), 69,507 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MultilevelMokhida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.