Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мысли Вслух 💭

Channel

Мысли Вслух 💭

@Mysli_VSlyx3

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,210subscribers

-4,431 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321789486
TypeChannel
Username@Mysli_VSlyx3
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mysli_VSlyx3

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Mysli_VSlyx3/5525 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC@Soulfulpajamas/23253 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC1.0072 seconds
@Mysli_VSlyx3/5526 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC@Soulfulpajamas/23273 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC1.005 minutes
@Mysli_VSlyx3/5528 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC@Soulfulpajamas/23404 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC1.0065 minutes
@Mysli_VSlyx3/5529 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC@Soulfulpajamas/23424 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC1.0059 minutes
@Mysli_VSlyx3/5530 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC@Soulfulpajamas/23445 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC1.008 minutes
@Mysli_VSlyx3/5532 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC@Soulfulpajamas/23495 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.0080 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Soulfulpajamas12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0016 minutesthis entry (12–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Mysli_VSlyx3 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far below this size band

21.6 average views per post against 14,210 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.152%. Across the 15,983 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.63% and 17.8%, with a median of 9.06%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured22 of 22 published in the window (22 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled476
Mature posts only0.167% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers14,210 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 15,983 channels · p10 2.37% · p25 4.63% · p50 9.06% · p75 17.8% · p90 30.5%
Position in cohort0.357th percentile · 1/59 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.203% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,21018,72116,465.57 August 2026 — 18,641 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,631 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,716 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,702 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,675 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,662 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,651 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,629 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,721 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,666 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,649 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,411 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,149 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,052 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,974 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,895 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,864 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,858 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,817 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,799 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,762 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,701 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,672 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,634 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,601 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,563 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,522 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,486 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,257 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,238 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,210 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4,431. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,533–19,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:1614,210-28
17 Sept 2026, 03:5614,238-19
15 Sept 2026, 05:5814,257-229
13 Sept 2026, 12:3814,486-36
11 Sept 2026, 14:4014,522-41
9 Sept 2026, 02:3814,563-38
5 Sept 2026, 15:1714,601-33
3 Sept 2026, 13:3714,634-38
2 Sept 2026, 03:4414,672-29
1 Sept 2026, 03:0314,701-26
30 Aug 2026, 23:0514,727-35
30 Aug 2026, 01:5514,762-37
28 Aug 2026, 23:0414,799-18
27 Aug 2026, 22:3214,817-41
26 Aug 2026, 19:2414,858-6
25 Aug 2026, 21:3414,864-31
24 Aug 2026, 18:3914,895-79
23 Aug 2026, 03:1214,974-78
21 Aug 2026, 13:1215,052-97
20 Aug 2026, 15:2515,149first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.152%
avg views ÷ 14,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.6
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held92 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total476
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 49s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC4 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

А жизнь — это сумка, ну, может, рюкзак, смотря с чем удобней шагать по дороге. Кому-то охота катить чемодан, кому-то кармана хватает в итоге. Вначале, как нищий, идешь налегке, успев затолкать в свою сумку лишь веру, Но с каждой минутой нести тяжелей - добавится все, и успех, и потери. Встречаешь в дороге таких же бродяг, хватаешь их мысли, советы, упрёки. И каждый стремится хвалить свой багаж: смотри, как хорош, и…

2 Sept 2026, 09:43 UTC8 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Как важно в этой жизни быть любимой, Быть под защитой мужественных рук. Единственною стать, неповторимой И пусть даже на зависть всех подруг. Улыбкой растворяться в его смехе И таять в поцелуе его губ. Как важно знать - достигнув всех успехов, Останется он верен - однолюб. Как важно быть уверенной и нежной С тем, с кем любые горы по плечу. Кружиться в платье счастья белоснежном И много лет шептать ему "люблю".

2 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC13 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🍁Настрой на день🍁 Как здорово, что у нас есть утро, чтобы мечтать, планировать и просто жить! Сегодня будет столько моментов, которые сделают тебя счастливой. Маленькие, простые, но такие важные. Не упусти их! ❣️Доброе утро, милая!

1 Sept 2026, 07:53 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Иногда.. Иногда люди ищут всю жизнь, а иногда находят за день. Иногда мы ждем, а иногда заставляем кого-то ждать нас. Иногда мы встречаем кого-то, и нам кажется это навсегда, а иногда провожаем, и понимаем, что так и должно было быть. Иногда мы стремимся к общению, расширяем круг знакомых, куда-то спешим, к кому-то торопимся, а порой хочется просто закрыть глаза, и больше ничего не надо — только ты и тишина, вселяющ…

1 Sept 2026, 03:43 UTC20 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🍁Настрой на день🍁 Чтоб дом был счастливым, наполненным лаской, Я дам вам рецепт под названием «Сказка». Несложный, но верный, его соблюдайте. Согласны? Ну что же, тогда приступайте. Шесть чашек ЛЮБВИ вы смешайте с ЗАБОТОЙ, Три ложки ДОВЕРИЯ, чашку РАБОТЫ, Две чашки ПРОЩЕНЬЯ и горсть ДОБРОТЫ, Добавьте чуть ВЕРНОСТИ, нежной МЕЧТЫ. Три чашки НАДЕЖДЫ и ДРУЖБЫ пол-миски, Стакан УВАЖЕНИЯ к старшим и близким. Две ложечки С…

31 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Выбирай мысли, приносящие тебе удовлетворение. Мысли, которые сбрасывают груз с твоих плеч. Мысли, способные поддержать тебя и тепло обнять. Поставь намерение, что с этого мгновения предназначение каждой твоей мысли — заботиться о тебе, подбадривать и радовать, подсвечивать хорошие моменты, любить тебя и поощрять. На случай, если никто тебе этого не говорил сегодня: «Я горжусь тобой и я знаю, как сильно ты стараешь…

31 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC23 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

О нежности С вoзpacтoм пoнимaeшь, чтo нeжнocть - этo ocoбoe cocтoяниe души, кoтopoe oчeнь тpуднo пepeдaть cлoвaми. Этo ocoбoe oтнoшeниe к тoму, кoгo любишь. ❤️ Этo cocтoяниe, кoгдa хoчeтcя cвoeй нeжнocтью, кaк лeгким oблaкoм oкутaть любимoгo чeлoвeкa и oгpaдить eгo oт тpeвoг, вoлнeний, пepeживaний и coмнeний. ❤️ Κoгдa нe нужнo лишних cлoв, a лишь тихoнькo пoдoйти, oбнять, тeм caмым пepeдaть eму cвoe тeплo, любoвь…

31 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC25 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🌸Настрой на день🌸 Хорошее утро начинается с хорошего кофе, или чая, или музыки, или улыбки хорошего человека... Пусть всё хорошее будет с вами! Отличного настроения на весь день и только положительных эмоций! ❣️ Доброе утро, милая!

30 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC25 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ты достигнешь всего, к чему сердце стремится, Напиши акварелью на облаке белом: "Нужно верить в себя, наши мысли как птицы, Россыпь лёгких колибри и ласточек смелых". Наверху синева, а внизу злые тени, Будут тени твердить: "Всё закончится плохо", Вопреки злому року и бездне сомнений, Находи в себе силы для нового вздоха. Всем крылатым на свете живётся непросто, Так бывает, что с неба — и в каменоломню, Развивайся, …

30 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✨Важные советы, которые не стоит игнорировать✨ ▫️Oтпустишь пpошлoе — пoлучишь бyдущее! ▫️Не отпустишь - так и проживёшь вчерашним днём! ▫️Празднуйте ваши победы. Смакуйте каждый, пусть даже самый маленький успех. ▫️У нас одна обязанность — быть счастливыми прямо сейчас.

30 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC22 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🌸Настрой на день🌸 Пусть новый день он будет про любовь... И про мечты и про уютные моменты... Про то, что в жизни есть тепло... Про то, что стоит делать комплименты... Про то, что можно в облаках летать... И верить в чудеса и просто так смеяться... Про то, что можно жизнь свою любить... И каждый день опять в неё влюбляться... ❣️Доброе утро, милая!

29 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC26 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

​​​​​​Мужчина находит правильную цель в жизни, а женщина – мужчину с правильной целью. Мужчина несет в семью благосостояние, активность, защиту, а женщина — настроение и теплую атмосферу. Любовь Мужчины — лучший рецепт молодости и красоты Женщины. А Любовь Женщины — лучший рецепт силы и успешности Мужчины.

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @Mysli_VSlyx3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психология отношений
@psy4love · 90,827
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Lady Of Crypto Community
@LadyofcryptoCommunity · 106,930
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
Психология
@psyxo1 · 115,788
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мысли Вслух 💭” (@Mysli_VSlyx3), 14,210 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mysli_VSlyx3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.