Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115,721–116,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 17:58
115,834
-33
14 Sept 2026, 23:16
115,867
-34
13 Sept 2026, 06:37
115,901
-25
11 Sept 2026, 08:36
115,926
-55
8 Sept 2026, 11:55
115,981
-52
5 Sept 2026, 06:20
116,033
-29
3 Sept 2026, 09:12
116,062
-28
1 Sept 2026, 23:28
116,090
-17
31 Aug 2026, 19:55
116,107
-25
30 Aug 2026, 22:53
116,132
-15
30 Aug 2026, 01:25
116,147
-22
29 Aug 2026, 01:59
116,169
-13
28 Aug 2026, 04:08
116,182
-12
27 Aug 2026, 07:42
116,194
-20
26 Aug 2026, 07:53
116,214
-29
25 Aug 2026, 07:07
116,243
-18
24 Aug 2026, 10:35
116,261
-23
22 Aug 2026, 18:04
116,284
-16
21 Aug 2026, 09:05
116,300
-24
20 Aug 2026, 06:48
116,324
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.87%
avg views ÷ 115,834 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,330
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
27 (25 June 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
13,320
Reactions total
180
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,150
Videos
≈392
Links
≈669
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,387 reactions across 27 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
718
51.8%
❤🔥
342
24.7%
💯
181
13.0%
🔥
63
4.54%
👍
27
1.95%
🤣
15
1.08%
👌
12
0.865%
🙏
11
0.793%
🎉
7
0.505%
🤔
4
0.288%
😢
3
0.216%
👏
2
0.144%
🤬
2
0.144%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,387 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Любят мужики оправдывать себя. Ушла женщина, значит, обязaтельно к другому. А совсем не потому, что он исчерпал лимит доверия. Нет, ну вы действительно не понимаете, что любое терпение не бесконечно, а точка невозврата существует?
Или поменять одного на другого - истинный смысл нашей женской судьбы? Для некоторых возможно. Они летают от одного к другому, как в той басне, не подозревая, что молодость имеет обыкновени…
— В моем понимании любовь между двумя людьми может состояться только тогда, когда каждый из них превратился в духовно зрелую личность, а по-настоящему глубокой и красивой она может быть только в том случае, когда в отношения идут из свободы. В вопросах чувств любое давление на другого человека вызывает лишь сопротивление.
Эх, знали бы бесстрашные молодые оторвы, ужасающие своими подвигами сеть, что активизм во все эпохи разный, а вот старость, иконы и коты - одинаковые во все времена
Влечение душ превращается в дружбу, влечение ума превращается в уважение, влечение тел превращается в страсть. И только все вместе может превратиться в любовь.
Мы сошлись на том, что в мужиках нас заводит главным образом ум, потому что только умный мужчина может быть интересным, даже когда он потолстеет и облысеет. Хуже всего, когда у него пресс рельефней, чем мозг.
Я не верю в идеальные отношения. Я верю в союз двух людей. Я хочу, чтобы рядом со мной был человек, который смог бы вынести нрав, прикормить демонов, понять внутренний мир и не наводить там свой порядок.
Просто прими меня и смотри со мной в одну сторону. Я хочу, чтобы меня любили, просто любили и заботились обо мне. Хочу, чтобы когда мне вздумалось все расхерачить, кто-то сильный обнял меня и не позволил этого сделат…
Как только вы прекратите давай себе оценку и думать о себе плохо, ваше эмоциональное состояние пойдёт вверх. Необходимо принять в себе всё и плохое и хорошее и не надо бесконечно копаться в прошлом, это только губит.
Очень нужно, конечно, научиться любить себя. Важная компетенция в работе, в любви и в жизни. Чтобы не тратить время на токсичных людей, не принимать близко к сердцу, не жертвовать своим здоровьем ради чего-либо или кого-либо и всегда позволять себе большее.
Я уверен в этой женщине. Я хочу провести с ней всю оставшуюся жизнь. В болезни и здравии. В бедности и богатстве. Отвергая всех остальных. Мне это подходит. Я хочу, чтобы ее лицо я видел последним, засыпая по ночам, и первым, что я увижу, просыпаясь утром. Я хочу наблюдать за тем, как с годами это лицо станет изменяться. Я хочу изучить все мельчайшие родинки у нее на теле, запомнить каждую веснушку на ее лице. Облада…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @psyxo1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Психология отношений @psy4love · 90,875 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Ложка @Lolojka · 93,125 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
Необычный Гороскоп @neo_goroskop · 78,822 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
Психологические тесты @psixologiya_channel · 42,468 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Psychologiy • Психология @psychologiy_tg · 95,931 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Позитивная психология @soulypsychology · 40,494 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
5 умных мыслей @worldthought · 177,310 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Психология | Психосоматика @Psikhologiaz · 24,914 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология” (@psyxo1), 115,834 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyxo1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.