Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Блог Вадима Калантарова

Channel

Блог Вадима Калантарова

@vadimkalantarov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,804subscribers

-226 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686687234
TypeChannel
Username@vadimkalantarov
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vadimkalantarov

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,80414,03013,9177 August 2026 — 14,030 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,021 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,015 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,003 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,993 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,991 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,980 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,970 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,960 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,956 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,953 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,944 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,939 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,934 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,935 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,944 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,941 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,933 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,947 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,945 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,937 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,932 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,925 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,914 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,892 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,871 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,842 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,830 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,822 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,811 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,804 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -226. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,770–14,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:1713,804-7
16 Sept 2026, 13:3913,811-11
14 Sept 2026, 18:1513,822-8
13 Sept 2026, 02:5513,830-12
11 Sept 2026, 01:3913,842-29
8 Sept 2026, 03:5913,871-21
5 Sept 2026, 02:3713,892-22
3 Sept 2026, 09:3913,914-11
2 Sept 2026, 00:3513,925-7
1 Sept 2026, 02:3813,932-5
31 Aug 2026, 02:2713,937-8
30 Aug 2026, 04:1613,945-2
29 Aug 2026, 06:2513,947+14
28 Aug 2026, 04:3613,933-8
27 Aug 2026, 05:0813,941-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:0813,944+9
25 Aug 2026, 10:0613,935+1
24 Aug 2026, 10:1213,934-5
22 Aug 2026, 19:1413,939-5
21 Aug 2026, 12:4813,944first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.71%
avg views ÷ 13,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
788
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held37 (14 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total4,728
Reactions total431
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,483 reactions across 37 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,59145.7%
🔥1,25135.9%
👍42012.1%
💯1012.90%
👏511.46%
❤‍🔥371.06%
🥰170.488%
🎉90.258%
💘30.086%
😍20.057%
😁10.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
573
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 37 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
231
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vadimkalantarov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 05:09 UTC502 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Как Хюррем влюбила Сулеймана? 💘 В сериале "Великолепный век" идеально показан рост значимости женщины в глазах мужчины и действия, которые приводят к такому результату. Если посмотреть на главную героиню сериала Хюррем, то она соблюдала главный принцип, который я транслирую в своем блоге - "Принцип Баланса". Султан был окружен людьми, которые его боялись, безоговорочно слушались и подчинялись. Но Хюррем действова…

❤13❤‍🔥7👏2💯2🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 05:09 UTC722 views105 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Никогда не говорите о себе плохо👇 Люди необъективны, каждый смотрит на реальность под своим "субъективным углом". А что влияет на то, как человек будет смотреть и оценивать реальность? А то, под какой призмой ему ее покажут. Почувствуйте разницу: "Наша эксклюзивная премиум коллекция пользуется спросом и успехом у мировых звезд киноиндустрии". И фотка на обложке, как какая-нибудь Анджелина Джоли позирует на красно…

🔥75❤24👍4💘2

31 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC746 views108 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Психология ценности. Кому нужнее?👇🏻 В Древней Греции был философ, которого звали Диоген. Мужик был настолько на своей волне, что ушёл жить в бочку (а точнее в пифос). Согласно легенде, у Диогена состоялась встреча с Александром Македонским, которая выглядела следующим образом: Александр Македонский посетил Карниф, к нему приехало огромное количество людей выразить своё почтение. Но среди них не было Диогена, с ко…

🔥83❤10👍8👏7

29 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC913 views87 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

О важности диалога в паре👇 Всем привет. Как-то в блоге мы уже с вами поднимали тему "когнитивных искажений". И в данном посте я хочу вам рассказать про еще одно искажение, которое называется "эффектом ложного консенсуса". Что это вообще такое? Эффект ложного консенсуса - это когнитивное искажение, при котором человек склонен переоценивать степень, в которой другие люди разделяют его убеждения, взгляды, привычки ил…

👍52❤23🔥7❤‍🔥3🥰1😁1

28 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC934 views60 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

"Я утонула в этих отношениях, потеряв себя"👇 Всем привет. В данном посте я хочу поделиться с вами кейсом своей ученицы, которая столкнулась с классической проблемой в отношениях: ➡️ Терпела то, что не нравится. ➡️ Очень сильно держалась за отношения и боялась их потерять. ➡️ Закрывала глаза на манипуляции мужчины. ➡️ Сглаживала углы там, где нужны были более решительные действия. ➡️ Замалчивала проблемы, чтобы …

🔥45👍9👏5❤1

27 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC911 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Эмоциональные качели в отношениях 👇🏻 Наш мозг устроен таким образом, что он куда охотнее зацикливается на незавершенных историях, чем на ситуациях, которые предсказуемы и понятны. Именно поэтому эмоциональные качели могут так затягивать. Сегодня мужчина ведет себя заинтересованно, пишет, звонит, хочет увидеться = вы чувствуете эмоциональный подъем, появляется надежда на светлое будущее. А через время он включает …

🔥30❤7👍5❤‍🔥2👏1

26 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈1,030 views57 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

Тема подкаста: Как когнитивные искажения негативно влияют на отношения? 🧠 ✅ Что такое когнитивные искажения и почему они есть у каждого человека? ✅ Почему стремление полностью избежать риска может приводить к неправильным решениям? ✅ Как страх потерять мужчину влияет на поведение женщины в отношениях? ✅ Почему попытка любой ценой удержать мужчину только ухудшает ситуацию?

❤38🔥11💯7👍1

25 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,150 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

"Со мной что-то не так" 🤔 Ловили себя на такой мысли, когда в отношениях возникали проблемы? Если да, то обязательно прослушайте данный подкаст до конца! P.S. Можно слушать на скорости х1,5

❤31👍11🔥10👏2

24 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC≈1,320 views99 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Почему отношения становятся хрупкими? 💔👇🏻 Всем привет. В своём блоге я периодически пишу о том, как дорогие и эксклюзивные бренды выстраивают своё позиционирование, чтобы на их примере узнать лучше психологию ценности. Но как себя ведет большинство обычных бизнесов? Об этом поговорим в данном посте. Они играют в очень простую игру, которая называется "Демпинг". Демпинг - это занижение стоимости. Т.е. предпринима…

❤77🔥13👍9

22 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,210 views126 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Поездка во Вьетнам 🌴 Всем привет. Решил немного разбавить блог контентом про путешествия. В данном посте я расскажу несколько необычных фактов про Вьетнам, которые лично меня удивили во время поездки в эту страну. Буду рассказывать про свой опыт в городе Нячанг, я был только там, возможно, в других городах жизнь чем-то отличается. Итак, поехали: 🎤 1 факт - Вьетнамцы любят петь абсолютно везде Они подключают кол…

🔥92❤18👍14💯2

21 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC≈1,300 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Простой совет, который может спасти ваши отношения👇🏻 А звучит этот совет так: Никогда не принимайте важные решения под влиянием сильных эмоций! Причем это касается как негативных, так и позитивных эмоций. Сколько раз я слышал от своих клиенток истории, когда, будучи в сильном гневе, они разрушали свои отношения и сжигали мосты, а потом, когда приходили в более стабильное состояние, очень сильно об этом жалели. И…

❤64🔥14💯9🥰2

20 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,460 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Почему соглашаться на меньшее - это не лучшая идея?👇🏻 Всем привет. Недавно я прочитал историю о нескольких люксовых брендах, которые уничтожали свои непроданные товары на миллионы долларов, чтобы не угробить свое позиционирование. Звучит безумно... Например, одна известная компания, которая производит часы, уничтожила свою продукцию на десятки или даже сотни миллионов долларов. Кажется нелогичным. Зачем они это д…

❤44👍11❤‍🔥7💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @vadimkalantarov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ты и Я I Наука отношений
@otnoshenia_psi · 63,507
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
Ева Снежинская про отношения
@pcollege_EvaSneg · 44,336
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Социальная психология
@YorPsycholog · 32,951
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Психологиня
@psihologinyatg · 25,253
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 September 2026
Модная истерика
@fashionisterika · 110,038
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
Психолог Марк Бартон
@markbarton_mb · 88,659
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
body_ianguage
@body_Ianguage · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 August 2026
Психология
@psyxo1 · 115,788
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
Дмитрий Гухман | Сексология
@idemvmeste_dimagukhman · 69,829
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Психология отношений
@psy4love · 90,827
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блог Вадима Калантарова” (@vadimkalantarov), 13,804 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vadimkalantarov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.