🔴 الحشد يُعدّ قلب العراق وعموده الفقري، وتتمثّل عقيدته بالمقاومة الإسلامية المقاومة الاسلامية حركة النجباء #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة

Channel
نون - NOON
@N00N_media
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,044subscribers
-294 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001214787384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @N00N_media |
| Description | المنصة الرسمية الألكترونية للمقاومة الإسلامية حركة النجباء / وحدة الإعلام الحربي @N00N_media |
| Created | 19 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/N00N_media |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:19 | 10,044 | +4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:05 | 10,040 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 10,045 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:40 | 10,053 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:45 | 10,056 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:47 | 10,053 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:38 | 10,055 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 10,056 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 10,062 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 10,064 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 10,069 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 10,068 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 10,071 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 10,076 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 10,080 | -17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 10,097 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 10,105 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 10,106 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:19 | 10,110 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 10,117 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.0%
- avg views ÷ 10,044 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,100
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (14 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,364 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 22:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,140
- Videos
- ≈894
- Links
- ≈1,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 20m 39s
- Average length
- 1m 43s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴 هذا أقلّ الوفاء لدماء الشهيد أبي مهدي المهندس، ودماء الشهداء الأبرار. المقاومة الاسلامية حركة النجباء #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة
🔴 الأصوات النشاز المدفوعة الثمن تسعى إلى إضعاف الحشد، بل إلى إنهائه وتذويبه؛ لأنهم يعلمون أنه السيف القاطع على رقاب أعداء العراق. المقاومة الاسلامية حركة النجباء #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة
🔴 نطالب الخيرين بالوقوف وقفة إباء وشرفٍ ورفض لهذه التعديلات التي تُضعف دور الحشد الشعبي. المقاومة الاسلامية حركة النجباء #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم (مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ رِجَالٌ صَدَقُوا مَا عَاهَدُوا اللَّهَ عَلَيْهِ، فَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ قَضَىٰ نَحْبَهُ وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ يَنْتَظِرُ، وَمَا بَدَّلُوا تَبْدِيلًا) في الوقت الذي طال انتظاره لإقرار قانون الحشد، والذي بقي معلّقاً إرضاءً للمجرم، قاتل الأطفال، ترامب الأحمق، نتفاجأ بتعديلات مجحفة، لم نستطع تفسيرها إلا بوجود أيادٍ مشبوهة وهابية وصهيونية خلفها. وإننا إذ نرفض هذه التعديلات جملةً وتفصيلاً، نط…
🔴 سلامٌ على الذين استبدلوا أعمارهم بلحظة عزّ، ورحلوا قبل أن يكتمل الحلم، ليبقى الحلم بعدهم حيًّا لا ينكسر. #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة #ليلة_الشهداء
🔴 السلام على فاطمة الزهراء . #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة
https://x.com/abdul_qader1oct/status/2112892996391719076
🔰الشيخ اكرم الكعبي : العراق بحاجة لمهنيين لا يهدرون الثروات بسوء الادارة #الإعلام_المركزي
🔴 استفتاء شرعي للشيخ عباس الكعبي حول جواز تقليد السيد القائد مجتبى الخامنئي ( حفظه الله ) #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة
🔴 في ليلة الجمعة، تهدأ الأصوات وتبقى حكايات الذين رحلوا وهم يحملون أرواحهم على أكفّهم، تاركين خلفهم دماءً لا تجفّ، وذكرياتٍ لا تغيب، وراياتٍ لا تنحني. #كنا_ومازلنا_مقاومة
#كاريكاتير ✌🏻*انگلع.. روحه بلا رده!* 🎨 المقاومة الإسلامية في العراق وطرد المحتل الأمريكي
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @N00N_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@awlialdm · 40,608
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@centerkaf · 41,317
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
@alashtar_iq · 18,769
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 October 2026
@xiuyhhu · 19,807
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 September 2026
@faairaq · 112,171
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
@QafArt · 20,773
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@Khamenei_arabi · 77,116
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
@ElamAlmoqawama · 35,819
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
@alrafidaincent · 82,341
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
@ashura_net · 45,287
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@khataam313 · 30,715
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@alhashed_alshaebe · 39,043
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@TuthiatAlshiyea · 31,536
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@StateMediaTeamForums · 24,850
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
@altaifaalmansoora · 21,108
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
@Abumahdi_com · 60,389
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
@naya_foriraq · 262,424
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@shajab_news · 38,113
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@ya3abbas · 24,819
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@hgjghfgj · 25,821
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
@LAmad313 · 99,093
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@alahadtvofficial · 24,557
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@ekabiy · 18,654
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
@Tweet92 · 98,491
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نون - NOON” (@N00N_media), 10,044 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/N00N_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.