🔵 في ذكرى استشهاد سيدة نساء العالمين.. أحر التعازي والمواساة إلى صاحب العصر والزمان الحجة بن الحسن المهدي عجل الله فرجه الشريف، وإلى الأمة الإسلامية، بذكرى شهادة الصديقة الطاهرة فاطمة الزهراء "عليها السلام"، التي بقيت سيرتها رمزا للصبر والثبات ونصرة الحق، سائلين الله تعالى أن يثبت قلوبنا على ولاية أهل البيت "عليهم السلام" ومحبة ذريتها، ويرزقنا شفاعتها. عظم الله أجورنا وأجوركم. #مركز_الرافدين_للحوار_RCD الاحد 8- …

Channel
مركز الرافدين للحوار - RCD
@alrafidaincent
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
98,980subscribers
+97,049 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001395183610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alrafidaincent |
| Description | 🔻حساباتنا الرسمية 🌎 Website : http://alrafidaincenter.com/ 🔗 Facebook : https://facebook.com/alrafidaincenter/ 🌐 PR Facebook : https://facebook.com/alrafidaincenterpr 🔗 X: https://x.com/alrafidaincent 📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rcdfo |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alrafidaincent |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 98,980 | -1,330 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 100,310 | -1,241 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 101,551 | +17,503 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 84,048 | +49,312 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 34,736 | +12,942 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 21,794 | -257 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 22,051 | -103 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 22,154 | +7,740 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:44 | 14,414 | +2,165 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 12,249 | -56 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 12,305 | -62 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 12,367 | -94 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 12,461 | -51 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 12,512 | -88 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 12,600 | -44 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 12,644 | -41 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 12,685 | -105 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 12,790 | -168 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 12,958 | +8,352 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 4,606 | first reading |
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.9%
- avg views ÷ 98,980 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,800
- 32 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 32
- of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (12 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 409,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,250
- Videos
- ≈258
- Links
- ≈832
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 44s
- Average length
- 1m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🔵 مركز الرافدين للحوار RCD ينشر مقالا حول السيادة الوطنية والمحسوبية في العراق نشر مركز الرافدين للحوار RCD مقالا جديدا بعنوان «خصخصة السيادة الوطنية وإعادة إنتاج المحسوبية: العراق أنموذجا»، للدكتور عمار أحمد إسماعيل المكوطر، المتخصص في العلاقات الدولية والدبلوماسية. يناقش المقال مفهوم السيادة الوطنية بوصفها جوهر الدولة الحديثة وأحد أهم مقومات وجودها واستقلال قرارها السياسي، مبينا أن السيادة لا تفقد بالضرورة من خلا…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔵برعاية ومشاركة رئيس الجمهورية.. مدير مركز الرافدين للحوار RCD يشارك في ندوة حوارية حول دور مراكز البحوث في صناعة القرار برعاية فخامة رئيس الجمهورية السيد نزار آميدي، وبدعوة من دائرة البحوث والدراسات في رئاسة الجمهورية، شارك المدير التنفيذي لمركز الرافدين للحوار ا.د. أسعد كاظم شبيب في الندوة الحوارية التي بحثت "دور مراكز البحوث والدراسات في صناعة القرار"، بمشاركة نخبة من رؤساء وممثلي مراكز الفكر والبحوث والدراسات في…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔵 مشاهد | التعاون بين مركز الرافدين للحوارRCD والمركز الوطني للتخطيط المشترك/ مستشارية الامن القومي في إطار مذكرة التعاون بين مركز الرافدين للحوار RCD ومستشارية الأمن القومي، أنجز المركز طباعة ونشر "استراتيجية الأمن الوطني العراقي (العراق أولا) 2025–2030"، وتسليمها إلى المركز الوطني للتخطيط المشترك. إنجاز يعكس دور المركز في دعم البحث والتخطيط وتعزيز الوعي بالقضايا الوطنية. #مركز_الرافدين_للحوار_RCD الثلاثاء 3- ر…
Video, posted without a caption
🔵 ﴿وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ﴾ الحوار ليس مجرد اختلاف في الآراء، بل مساحة لفهم الآخر، وتبادل الأفكار، والبحث عن المشترك الذي يجمعنا. وفي اليوم الدولي للديمقراطية، نؤكد أن احترام الرأي، وقبول التعدد، والاحتكام إلى الكلمة الواعية، تمثل أسسا لمجتمع أكثر تماسكًا وقدرة على صناعة مستقبله. #مركز_الرافدين_للحوار_RCD الثلاثاء 3- ربيع الآخر-١٤٤٨هـ 15 ايلول (سبتمبر) 2026م تواصل مع مركز الرافدين للحوار عبر منصا…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔵في إطار مذكرة التعاون بين مركز الرافدين للحوار RCD ومستشارية الأمن القومي.. إنجاز "استراتيجية الأمن الوطني العراقي 2025–2030 (العراق أولا)" ضمن مذكرة التعاون المبرمة بين مركز الرافدين للحوار RCD ومستشارية الأمن القومي/المركز الوطني للتخطيط المشترك، أنجز المركز طباعة ونشر "استراتيجية الأمن الوطني العراقي 2025–2030 (العراق أولا)"، فيما سلّم وفد المركز برئاسة ا.د. اسعد كاظم شبيب، والأستاذ جاسم القابجي مسؤول قسم المراس…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @alrafidaincent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alrafidaincent edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 15 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bayancps · 1,579#1
@infomscr · 1,093#2
@tDrgeem · 2,103#3
@iraqiinstitute · 1,824#4
@Alhadarah1 · 1,397#5
@baidarcenter · 649#6
@CSAPI · 2,720#7
@egyc4m · 969#8
@Securit313y · 2,565#9
@vip_vip202 · 1,240#10
@library13ck · 2,600#11
@alghad1press · 47,549#12
@albasri_pmf · 1,067#13
@Center221 · 839 (as read 9 September 2026)#14
@politikapostt · 9,537#15
@onenajaf11 · 2,186#16
@N00N_media · 10,274#17
@kawt7 · 2,306#18
@AlRafidainLegalLibrary · 3,783#19
@ArabCenter_ar · 7,430#20
@alkhattabirw · 44,248#21
@One_Muqtada · 2,581#22
@inewschannel_tv · 16,269#23
@political92 · 7,993#24
@Ahmed_Yassin90 · 4,020#25
@ArbBooks · 14,222#26
@kotobtarbawia · 4,884#27
@awlialdm · 41,606#28
@Om_mohmad1222 · 3,976#29
@kotob_sa7afa · 16,677#30
@zaidalwan3204 · 12,212#31
@Economynews2021 · 4,508#32
@sydialogue · 1,675#33
@Marketing_Awaser · 2,034#34
@mamoniraq · 316#35
@militaryphotos2 · 783#36
@dalahcentaer · 979 (as read 9 September 2026)#37
@sudanvva · 2,799#38
@dimensionscenter · 406#39
@v17y7y · 9,987#40
@Khawla_idea · 17,595#41
@ClassroomNouf · 2,831#42
@iraqDMC · 3,847#43
@AsbabGEO · 3,652#44
@hadi1997hadi · 372#45
@Nohoudhcenter · 6,099#46
@E7sas2039 · 22,547#47
@WnFi1ff_gEliMjhk · 19,492#48
@AljoudIQ · 2,821#49
@wwwimm · 1,602#50
@military_mediaa · 1,209#51
@waleed_algaw2020 · 13,854#52
@alweeeeeeeeer · 11,494#53
@Indulging1 · 1,096#54
@klaw0 · 39,599#55
@militarypupil · 8,893#56
@afkar_idea · 42,026#57
@dawrat_net · 2,897#58
@arab_geographers · 6,291#59
@nouraruh11 · 10,338#60
@nabaa_news · 1,384#61
@reemywsk1 · 5,408#62
@library_geo · 5,773#63
@ajabatkum4 · 13,572#64
@majidshingali · 3,087#65
@binance_ar_BNB · 23,248#66
@ceomanager2 · 1,028 (as read 9 September 2026)#67
@rana2288 · 18,252#68
@mu3limat · 13,319#69
@military_zoneiq · 1,569#70
@maosooah · 2,981#71
@library9999 · 4,833#72
@drmoh20221959 · 13,792#73
@arabJournalism · 8,493#74
@montlq · 4,442#75
@rewaqbaghdadforpublicpolicy · 919#76
@AmalAma2 · 12,806#77
@inkypublishing · 1,167#78
@vlib_school · 1,854 (as read 9 September 2026)#79
@k19931993k · 3,907#80
@politike · 10,170#81
@azharalgory1 · 33,005#82
@qaedko_fm · 1,276#83
@ElementarySchool123 · 26,452#84
@thefuturist2021 · 17,341#85
@imjusttraderr · 277#86
@AlQasouranews · 9,711#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@binance_ar_BNB · 23,248
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
@azharalgory1 · 33,005
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مركز الرافدين للحوار - RCD” (@alrafidaincent), 98,980 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alrafidaincent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.