Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
61,000 average views per post against 42,466 subscribers — an engagement rate of 143.6%. Across the 2,088 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.67% and 11.7%, with a median of 5.11%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
975,800
Mature posts only
152.0% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net +122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,952–42,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 17:42
42,466
-40
27 Aug 2026, 19:07
42,506
+27
26 Aug 2026, 16:09
42,479
+121
25 Aug 2026, 16:23
42,358
-12
24 Aug 2026, 15:06
42,370
-48
22 Aug 2026, 21:52
42,418
-70
21 Aug 2026, 14:25
42,488
-24
20 Aug 2026, 16:55
42,512
-17
19 Aug 2026, 14:15
42,529
-8
18 Aug 2026, 12:03
42,537
+509
17 Aug 2026, 14:05
42,028
-49
16 Aug 2026, 08:35
42,077
-74
14 Aug 2026, 18:28
42,151
-34
13 Aug 2026, 11:17
42,185
-8
12 Aug 2026, 12:14
42,193
+2
11 Aug 2026, 11:04
42,191
-23
10 Aug 2026, 13:23
42,214
-59
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
42,273
-21
8 Aug 2026, 10:54
42,294
-57
7 Aug 2026, 08:28
42,351
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
143.6%
avg views ÷ 42,466 subscribers
Avg views / post
61,000
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
26 (16 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
975,800
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,400
Videos
≈1,010
Links
≈176
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 04s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
ببالغ الاستهجان والرفض القاطع تلقينا نبأ صدور حكم جائر بحق مفتي سوريا الشيخ الدكتور أحمد بدر الدين حسون، في خطوة تمثّل استمراراً لمنهجية استهداف الشخصيات الإسلامية التي طالما دافعت عن وحدة الأمة وسماحة الدين الحنيف.
لقد كان المفتي طوال مسيرته رجل اعتدالٍ بكل ما تعنيه الكلمة؛ وقف سداً منيعاً أمام مشاريع التفرقة المذهبية والفتن الطائفية، وكرّس خطابه لإعلاء قيم التسامح والتعايش السلمي ووحدة الصف…
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
(ذَٰلِكَ وَمَن يُعَظِّمْ شَعَائِرَ اللَّهِ فَإِنَّهَا مِن تَقْوَى الْقُلُوبِ)
الحمد لله رب العالمين، والصلاة والسلام على قائدنا ونبينا محمد الأمين، وأهل بيته الطيبين الطاهرين، ورضي الله عن صحبه الأخيار المنتجبين، وعباده الصالحين والشهداء والمجاهدين.
السلام على الحسين، وعلى علي بن الحسين، وعلى أولاد الحسين، وعلى أصحاب الحسين، والسلام على الإمام الخميني المعظم، مؤسس محور المقاومة والكرامة والخي…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @centerkaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 3,486 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
صابرين الرياضية - Sabereen sport @Sabereen3 · 64,219#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الإمام الشهيد السيد علي الخامنئي @Khamenei_arabi · 80,210 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
مدير الدائرة الادارية والمالية العامة @husseinismal · 77,213 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
سرايا اولياء الدم @awlialdm · 42,027 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
الشهيد ابو مهدي المهندس @Abumahdi_com · 57,001 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
أمة الحشد | crowd nation @crowdnation · 113,492 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
صابرين الرياضية - Sabereen sport @Sabereen3 · 64,219 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
نايا - NAYA @naya_foriraq · 268,832 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
صابرين نيوز - Sabereen news @SabrenNewss · 1,103,350 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
تغريدة الحشد @Tweet92 · 90,933 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
ابو فاطمة العراقي @uuuurrr9 · 161,847 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
ابو فاطمة العراقي للمعلومات الإدارية والمالية الخاصة بالحشد الشعبي @hhhh77773 · 126,670 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
مديرية شؤون المحافظات @shoonm · 52,946 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
جهاز الأمن الوطني العراقي @INSS_IRAQ · 43,091 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
وكالة الحشد اون لاين Online Alhashd Agency @online_alhashd · 45,862 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
الأمانة العامة لمجلس الوزراء @cabinetmedia · 86,835 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
العميد @LAmad313 · 100,289 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
أشارة رواتب الألكتروني @memkmkmlml2014 · 50,505 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
مصطفى جبار سند @mustafajabbarsanad · 96,535 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كاف - Kaf” (@centerkaf), 42,466 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/centerkaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
