Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 48 days, net -1,622. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,489–40,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 21:39
38,732
-198
18 Sept 2026, 18:18
38,930
-80
16 Sept 2026, 11:55
39,010
-81
14 Sept 2026, 18:16
39,091
-51
13 Sept 2026, 04:19
39,142
-45
11 Sept 2026, 06:41
39,187
-109
8 Sept 2026, 11:36
39,296
-103
5 Sept 2026, 06:01
39,399
-50
3 Sept 2026, 07:58
39,449
-42
2 Sept 2026, 03:58
39,491
-34
1 Sept 2026, 04:18
39,525
-42
31 Aug 2026, 06:46
39,567
-59
30 Aug 2026, 03:57
39,626
-27
29 Aug 2026, 05:13
39,653
-27
28 Aug 2026, 07:53
39,680
-42
27 Aug 2026, 07:09
39,722
-54
26 Aug 2026, 07:18
39,776
-43
25 Aug 2026, 05:53
39,819
-53
24 Aug 2026, 09:16
39,872
-65
22 Aug 2026, 20:14
39,937
first reading
Engagement
1,352 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.60%
avg views ÷ 38,732 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
804 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
804
of 1,352 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 801 of 804 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
1,352 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
808,334
Reactions total
28,130
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈50,400
Videos
≈26,000
Links
≈104,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 52m
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 247 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,151 reactions across 994 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18,039
47.3%
🤬
4,637
12.2%
👍
3,132
8.21%
😡
2,050
5.37%
👏
2,048
5.37%
🔥
2,001
5.24%
👌
1,250
3.28%
🤩
878
2.30%
😢
842
2.21%
💔
801
2.10%
🫡
517
1.36%
💯
358
0.938%
😱
342
0.896%
🌚
316
0.828%
🤯
309
0.81%
🙏
193
0.506%
👀
115
0.301%
❤🔥
114
0.299%
🥰
93
0.244%
😨
59
0.155%
5 further kinds
57
0.149%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 996 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thkreatjanubi1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
سي إن إن عن مصادر |
ساعدت صور الأقمار الصناعية والدعم الاستخباراتي المقدم من الجماعات الصينية إيران على تهديد السفن في مضيق هرمز وشن ضربات دقيقة على القواعد العسكرية الأمريكية في الشرق الأوسط، وهو جزء من تحسن كبير في قدرات الاستهداف الإيرانية خلال الأشهر القليلة الماضية.
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
تتذكرون المهزلة!
من رشح السيد المالكي من قبل الاطار ؛ خبصونا .. راح ناكل رمل و حصو و نشبع هم وغم لان امريكا راح تسوي عقوبات اقتصادية!
مو بس هيج ؛ لا أبدا!
بل سووا اخبار كاذبة على لسان أبو البنك المركزي بانه استلم رسائل تهديد اقتصادية من امريكا!
وعلمود هيج اسمحوا النا احنا نرفض المالكي 😂
اليوم يحاصرون الجمهورية الاسلامية وما سمعنا الهم لا صوت ولا حس و يخضعون للأمريكي ومالهم موقف!!!
- يا علچ أبو السهم شگد طيب انت…
٣٠ أيلول يوم السيادة
ومواقع العفطية تحتفل
والدنيا مقلوبة قلاب!
وكلها شادة حيلها
وتاليها الحكومة تخضع للأوامر الأمريكية بإلغاء الطيران بين ايران و العراق 😂
ويقول لك احتفل بالسيادة 😂
ولك هم من يشربون ماي لازم يأخذون رخصة من ترامب!!!
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
مستشار قائد الثورة، محمد مخبر:
التحالف مع أمريكا في تنفيذ سياسات عدائية سيبقى محفورًا في ذاكرة الشعب الإيراني، على الرغم من أن استراتيجيتنا في هذا الشأن واضحة: إما أن يكون الطيران في المنطقة متاحًا للجميع، أو غير متاح لأحد. إذا لم تتمكن إيران من الطيران وتلقي الخدمات الجوية، فلن تتمكن أي دولة أخرى في المنطقة من ذلك أيضًا.
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
نائب رئيس أركان الجيش الإيراني:
إيران نجحت اليوم في دفع خصمها إلى زاوية المواجهة، مؤكداً أن هذا الإنجاز جاء نتيجة ثبات وعظمة رجال سابقين، نقلوا قيم الصمود والثبات إلى الأجيال الجديدة.
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
فايننشال تايمز:
ارتفاع في كلفة استئجار ناقلات النفط العملاقة، لتتجاوز 1.2 مليون دولار يوميًا على خطوط النقل بين الشرق الأوسط وآسيا، في ظل اضطراب حركة الشحن المرتبط بالحرب مع إيران ونقص حاد في ناقلات النفط العملاقة.
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
الله شاهد |
الاطار حاليا اذا ترامب يقول لهم امنعوا زيارة الاربعين القادمة هم يمنعونها!
من يمنع زيارة امير المؤمنين عليه السلام ؛ تصير الباقيات سهلة عليه!
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
حرس الثورة الإسلامية:
في حال وقوع هجوم جديد، ستُجري إيران تغييرات في أسلوب دفاعها وردها المتبادل، بما في ذلك تغيير جغرافية المواجهة، واستخدام معدات وأسلحة جديدة، واختيار أهداف مختلفة.
تمتلك إيران بعض القدرات والأهداف الاستراتيجية التي لم تُستخدم حتى الآن، وفي حال الضرورة ستستخدم هذه القدرات.
https://t.me/thkreatjanubi1
❤24🔥2🫡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,352 posts we hold for @thkreatjanubi1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
القصف العشوائي @bombing156 · 25,373 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
مصطفى جبار سند @mustafajabbarsanad · 96,223 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
هنا الخبر @Huna_Alkhabar · 31,036 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
جمهورية حناطة @Hanata_Republic · 48,924 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
احمد الذواق @Al_thawaq · 360,116 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
شعجب نيوز - Shajab news @shajab_news · 37,173 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
توثية الشيعة @TuthiatAlshiyea · 31,407 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
شهد الياسري - Shahd Al Yasiri @Shahadyasiri · 224,491 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
فريق الولاية الإعلامي |تیم رسانه ای @StateMediaTeamForums · 25,009 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
تغريدة الحشد @Tweet92 · 89,240 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
الكورنيت الكتائبي @altaifaalmansoora · 21,952 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
ALAhad TV - قناة العهد @alahadtvofficial · 24,570 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
مجلة العهد المتجدد @ehdmt · 23,017 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
مركز خاتم الأنبياء للإعلام المقاوم @khataam313 · 25,308 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
ABC العربية @abcnews_agency · 48,719 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
وكالة الحشد اون لاين Online Alhashd Agency @online_alhashd · 45,609 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
الغد برس @alghad1press · 47,549 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
نايا - NAYA @naya_foriraq · 266,953 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
صابرين نيوز - Sabereen news @SabrenNewss · 1,101,970 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
العراق أولا @iraq_awla · 31,982 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
العميد @LAmad313 · 101,726 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
العصفورة @Al_3sforh · 100,312 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
المركز الخبري الوطني @nnc101 · 152,443 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
قناة الرابعة - Al Rabiaa TV @alrabiaatv · 21,025 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 86 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ذكريات جنوبي” (@thkreatjanubi1), 38,732 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thkreatjanubi1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.