Channel
@bombing156
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,373subscribers
+206 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001749956229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bombing156 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bombing156 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 25,373 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 25,368 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 25,376 | +37 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 25,339 | +33 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 25,306 | +12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 25,294 | -18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 25,312 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 25,308 | +24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 25,284 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 25,287 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 25,289 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 25,298 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 25,305 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 25,302 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 25,326 | +8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 25,318 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 25,325 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 25,320 | +15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 25,305 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 25,301 | first reading |
616 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 616 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 316,859 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 286 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
تقنية الVAR الصحفية العالمية هبة بعبوص تتهم رئيس جمهورية البشير شوز بالخيانة والعمالة والارتزاق عند شياع السوداني وتتهمه بعلاسة التشرينيين وتتهمه بالفساد الاداري كاملاً وليس متقطعاً حمودي سويلها فاصل ابو تلث دقايق عن الاصطناعي لان ماتسوى حلقة هاي السربوتة
Video, posted without a caption
تصريح خطير من النغلة هبة بعبوص التي قررت فصل عدد من التشرينيين بقرار لا استئناف فيه زين انتي مشاركة بالمظاهرات؟ لا انتي شامة ريحة الدخانية؟ لا انتي نايمة بالخيمة ؟ لا انتي متبعبصة بالتحرير؟ لا چا شلون صرتي تشرينية بالحث لو بالانشطار البسيط زين الي راحوا اشتغلون مع خميس الخنجر مثلچ ومثل رسلي هذول مشمولين بالقاعدة مالتج لو بيهم استثناء !؟ 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
هسة المفروض غيث يسوي قسام شرعي للورثة مال المرحومة تشرين حتى نعرف من هم ورثتها مو اي واحد يجي ويگول اني ابنها وهو نغل جاي بطريقة غير شرعية سفاح
هذا نغل يصيح لامه بدون تحليل الDNA وشكلة نگري قفاص 56 حتى صورة ماعندة بين الجسر والساحة فايق طلع تناحة
وناخذ اول نغل ركب الموجة وادعى انه احد آباء تشرين المجيدة حبيبي انت اسمك مموجود بتيار الموطة مال غيث يعني الDNA مالتك يقرا عندي نغل فما هو تعليقك حول الموضوع 😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫😵💫
الذنب الصهيوني غيث التميمي يقول انا من خطط لاطلاق التظاهرات في تشرين وانا من حدد شعاراتها قبل انطلاقها بثلاثة اشهر وكل من التحق بها فيما بعد انما هو نغل ركب الموجة الاخوة النغولة في تشرين يتفضلون يمي على الستيچ ترا زحمة هذا التصريح يعني الاب الروحي لتشرين فايق دعبول يطلع نغيل تابع الخيل 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
الدواعش الشهيد عندهم لازم يكون امير بتنظيم القاعدة متحول الى عميل للامريكان مثل هشام ابو هريرة الذي تشبه قصته قصة الجولاني لكن الاف الشهداء نتيجة مفخخاتهم وانتحارييهم هذول محد يجيب لهم اي طاري واذا جابو طاريهم فالاجل اتهام المالكي بقتلهم
هسة منو المحاصرة وعليها حرب مسترة ايران لو دول الخليج الفارسي 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
حرفياً البانزين بايران متوفر وارخص من الماء ليمون للدول العربية الي حسرة عليهم لتر البانزين 🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋
البنگلادش چان يوفر خدمات خاصة لطلال الزوبعي وهسة مقهور عليه بالسجن 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
افهم من كلامك عندك دكمة تتحكم بالاگزوز مال مرتك سارة وانت تريدة مفتوح لملعم الفنية 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
Showing the 12 most recent of 616 posts we hold for @bombing156. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@bombing156 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“القصف العشوائي” (@bombing156), 25,373 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bombing156.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.