نصـــــــــر من الله وفتــــــــحٌ قريب
❤26😁1

Channel
@falc313
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,094subscribers
-156 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001609271560 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @falc313 |
| Description | يقينا كله خير 🤖 بوت التواصل والرد الفوري – قناة الشاهين 📩 للاستفسارات والتواصل المباشر 🔗 @falc313bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/falc313 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 11,094 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:48 | 11,099 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 11,108 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 11,120 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 11,132 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 11,139 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 11,148 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 11,157 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 11,165 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 11,154 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 11,161 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 11,168 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 11,165 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 11,172 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 11,175 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 11,182 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 11,192 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 11,199 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 11,208 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 11,223 | first reading |
471 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 446 of 471 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 471 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 231,775 |
| Reactions total | 10,014 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 102 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10,014 reactions across 446 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,349 | 23.5% | |
| 🤣 | 2,208 | 22.0% | |
| 😁 | 1,979 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 531 | 5.30% | |
| 👏 | 497 | 4.96% | |
| 👍 | 448 | 4.47% | |
| 🤬 | 381 | 3.80% | |
| 💩 | 334 | 3.34% | |
| 🫡 | 227 | 2.27% | |
| 🤮 | 185 | 1.85% | |
| 👌 | 151 | 1.51% | |
| 💔 | 140 | 1.40% | |
| 👎 | 79 | 0.789% | |
| 🗿 | 69 | 0.689% | |
| 😢 | 58 | 0.579% | |
| 😡 | 38 | 0.379% | |
| 🖕 | 33 | 0.33% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 0.33% | |
| 🥴 | 33 | 0.33% | |
| 🍌 | 28 | 0.28% | |
| 27 further kinds | 213 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 446 of the 471 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,014 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 471 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نصـــــــــر من الله وفتــــــــحٌ قريب
❤26😁1
المالكي: الحشد باقٍ كما الفصائل ستبقى ولن تسلم السلاح في 30 أيلول
❤27💩3🫡2👍1😁1
صور.. معرض بغداد الدولي للكتاب بدورته الـ27
👏11👍3
الأمين العام لحركة النجــباء الشيخ أكــرم الكــعبي: لن نسمح بمرور طائرات ترامب بعد 30 أيلول: سنجعلكم جثثاً هامدة
❤34🫡4💩2😁1
هيئة العمليات البريطانية: تلقينا بلاغا متأخرا عن حادثة في مضيق هرمز
❤17🔥4
أعلن تنظيم دAعش تبنيه عملية إستهداف عجلة تابعة لقيادي بالحشد العشائري ، بعبوة ناسفة في محافظة الأنبار العراقية ، و يأتي هذا بعد فترة صمت طويلة للتنظيم وسط تلقيه عدة ضربات عسكرية و لوجستية خلالها .
🤬15❤11🤣1
بسواعد السُّمُر، دفنّا الإرهـاب وأذنابه، وكتبنا بدمـاء التضحيات نهايةَ مشروعهم إلى غير رجعة. #هيئة_الحشد_الشعبي
❤25👏1🔥1
بيانات أمريكية: صادرات العراق النفطية تتخطى مليوني برميل يوميا لأول مرة منذ أزمة هرمز
👏7
شرطة الرصافة تداهم وكراً في منطقة الأعظمية (محلة 314)، وتلقي القبض على أفراد من الجنسية السورية بحوزتهم أسلحة غير مرخصة ومشروبات كحولية. المتهمون مودعون حالياً في مركز شرطة الأعظمية لإكمال الإجراءات القانونية.
👍21🔥4❤1🥰1
تجارة المخدرات في #الموصل مخدرات #نينوى تضبط (٧ آلاف) حبة من المؤثرات العقلية، وتطيح بمتهم خطير في #كركوك!
👏8🔥3
إشكالية أساسية تخص "السلاح" تتهرب حكومة الزيدي من الإجابة عليها بعد مرور حوالي أربعة اشهر على حكومة علي الزيدي من المنطقي مراجعة ابرز خطوات هذه الحكومة ولو بشكل مبدئي. حكومة الزيدي تتحدث عن مرحلة اقتصادية جديد وتبشر بخدمات مختلفة لكنها عمليا تتحرك على الأرض بمسار مختلف ليس له علاقة بالاقتصاد وغير مهتم بالخدمات وانما يرتكز على نقطتين أساسيتين. حملات الفساد الإداري "الانتقائية" ذات الطابع الاستعراضي على غرار أموال ف…
❤8👍3
وكالة تسنيم -"معسكر تيتين" الذي تم استهدافه يقع في مكان بالغ الأهمية في الطرف الشمالي للبحر الأحمر بالقرب من ميناء العقبة وميناء "إيلات" الإسرائيلي -المعسكر المستهدف يقع على مسافة قصيرة من الحدود السعودية وهو مناسب لتدريبات مشاة البحرية الأميركية وحماية البنى التحتية البحرية -معسكر "تيتين" يتمتع بأهمية خاصة بالنسبة إلى مشاة البحرية الأميركية وعمليات الانتشار السريع للقوات -النقطة الأهم هي أن الأميركيين حاولوا نشر…
🔥17👍7❤3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 471 posts we hold for @falc313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
جاوب على الخيار الصحيح: من تخلي البطل بصف:
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 471 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 378,045 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشاهين 🦅” (@falc313), 11,094 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/falc313.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.