Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -429. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68,283–68,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 03:37
68,347
-34
3 Sept 2026, 07:06
68,381
-25
2 Sept 2026, 00:15
68,406
-20
31 Aug 2026, 21:35
68,426
-1
29 Aug 2026, 19:04
68,427
-21
28 Aug 2026, 21:52
68,448
-8
27 Aug 2026, 19:34
68,456
-19
26 Aug 2026, 16:46
68,475
-12
25 Aug 2026, 18:02
68,487
-20
24 Aug 2026, 14:44
68,507
-20
23 Aug 2026, 00:05
68,527
-6
21 Aug 2026, 14:57
68,533
-9
20 Aug 2026, 11:54
68,542
-11
19 Aug 2026, 14:28
68,553
-23
18 Aug 2026, 12:13
68,576
-16
17 Aug 2026, 12:17
68,592
-32
16 Aug 2026, 05:04
68,624
-17
14 Aug 2026, 17:08
68,641
-14
13 Aug 2026, 09:25
68,655
-22
12 Aug 2026, 07:24
68,677
first reading
Engagement
224 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.06%
avg views ÷ 68,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,510
186 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
187
of 224 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held
224 (2 August 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Views total
1,025,113
Reactions total
34,057
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,600
Videos
≈3,390
Links
≈18,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39,716 reactions across 211 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31,342
78.9%
👍
3,571
8.99%
😢
2,901
7.30%
👏
784
1.97%
😡
476
1.20%
😱
285
0.718%
😁
274
0.69%
🔥
83
0.209%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 223 of the 224 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الإنسانية العوراء وقضية (ليندسي كلانسي)!!
هل تتخيل أن تخرج إلى مدينة ألعاب أو حديقة أو مكان تسوق مع أطفالك وبينكم امرأة قاتلة حرة طليقة بل هي أم قاتلة قتلت أطفالها؟
هذا ما يجري الآن في أمريكا، حيث ينشغل العالم يقضية أم تدعى (ليندسي كلانسي) قتلت أطفالها الثلاثة البالغة أعمارهم: ٥ سنوات، ٣ سنوات، ٨ أشهر، منذ ٢٠٢٣ ولم يتم الحكم بحقها إلى الآن، بل رافق محاكمتها تعاطف نسوي وغيره بحجة أنها كانت تعاني من ذهان ما بعد الولاد…
مؤسسة العين المرعية من قبل مكتب المرجع الأعلى (دام ظله) تعلن عن إنجاز 126 مشروعاً، فيما لا يزال 36 منها قيد الإنشاء.
للاشتراك بقناتنا على الواتساب اضغط هنا
العثور على رفات جنود عراقيين وتشييعهم بعد 12 عاماً من استـ . ـشهادهم في معارك الدفاع عن البلاد بعد اجتياحها من د1عش وصدور فتوى الدفاع الكفائي.
رحم الله جميع الشهداء وألهم ذويهم ومحبيهم الصبر والسلوان.
للاشتراك بقناتنا على الواتساب اضغط هنا
من أهم أنواع التبليغ الديني هو العمل على ترسيخ المفاهيم القرآنية والعقائدية في نفوس الناشئة من الفتية والفتيات، ليواجهوا بأمان هذه الحياة المليئة بالمزالق الفكرية والتربوية.
وهذا التجمّع الوقور من الفتيات، وعند مرقد مولانا الإمام الحسين (ع) هو حفل اختتام للدورات القرآنية الصيفية، جزى الله تعالى القائمين عليه خيراً.
ويفترض بالأهل أن يبادروا هم بالبحث عن مثل هذه الدورات ويسجلوا أبناءهم فيها، وحينها لا بدّ من التدقيق …
السيد السيستاني (دام ظله) شيّد هذه المدارس وغيرها وسمّاها بأسماء علماء الشيعة تخليداً لذكراهم، ولم يسمِّ واحدةً منها باسمه، هكذا هم العلماء الربانيون الذين خالفوا هواهم وأطاعوا أمرَ مولاهم!
#مجموعة_إكسير_الحكمة
للاشتراك بقناتنا على الواتساب اضغط هنا
تمرّ علينا في هذه الأيام ذكرى رحيل الوالد والولد رضوان الله تعالى عليهما وعلى جميع علماء مدرسة أهل البيت عليهم السلام.
للاشتراك بقناتنا على الواتساب اضغط هنا
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤101😢35👍15👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 224 posts we hold for @Elixirofwisdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 34 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
أحد الأئمة المعصومين (ع) عاش ظروفاً عصيبة جداً لدرجة أنَّ أصحابه عندما كانوا يتحدّثون بأحاديثه كانوا يطلقون عليه ألقاباً معروفة بينهم ومجهولة عند عامة الناس مثل (الرجل، العبد الصالح)، فمن هو؟
الإمام السجاد (ع)13%
الإمام الكاظم (ع)67%
الإمام المهدي (ع)18%
لا أعلم2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الائمة الاثنا عشر @The12ImamsWeb · 40,599 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
السيد السيستاني دام الله ظله @lmamhusainorg · 78,507 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
السيد رشيد الحسيني @rashid_alhussainy · 52,010 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
مرتضى المدرسي @smortadha · 38,148 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
العتبة الرضوية المقدسة @ImamRedaAS · 43,447 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
العتبة العباسية المقدسة @alkafeel_global_network · 107,878 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
قناة العتبة الحسينية المقدسة @imamhussain_ar · 153,739 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
السياسة نيوز @alsyasehnews · 93,483 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Karrar Bakkan - كرار بكان @KarrarBakkan · 38,845 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
شبكة عاشوراء المرئية @ashura_net · 46,658 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
حقيبة المؤمن @haqybatelmomen · 79,420 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
السيد علي القاضي @Mahabu · 55,100 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
اهل النجف @alnjfmdenty · 33,686 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
العتبة العلوية المقدسة @ImamAliNet · 85,924 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
عمار الحكيم @ammar_alhakeem · 165,644 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
السّيد محسن المُدَرسي @Mohsen_Modarresi · 33,208 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
السيد بهاء الموسوي @musawu · 38,434 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
علي عسيلي العاملي @AliOsailyAmily · 33,536 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
مسائل شرعية وردود @sistane · 74,610 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
مكتبتي 📚📕 @BOOK_93 · 45,868 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
هنا الخبر @Huna_Alkhabar · 31,082 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
🌅 العارف بالله🌅 @AlArifbilah · 31,834 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
ذكريات جنوبي @thkreatjanubi1 · 39,399 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
❀أحرف نورانية/ذخيرة العمل الصالح❀ @ahrof99noor · 51,944 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة إكسير الحكمة” (@Elixirofwisdom), 68,347 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elixirofwisdom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.