Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for التراث والتحقيق بين يديك

Channel

التراث والتحقيق بين يديك

@ahmad1971a

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,653subscribers

+507 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001326202006
TypeChannel
Username@ahmad1971a
Created7 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ahmad1971a

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,14613,65313,399.56 August 2026 — 13,146 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,184 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,186 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,192 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,200 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,205 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,216 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,229 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,236 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,238 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,253 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,271 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,283 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,302 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,305 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,308 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,310 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,309 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,323 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,320 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,334 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,351 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,366 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,384 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,402 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,419 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,437 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,425 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,435 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,451 subscribers26 September 2026 — 13,494 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,554 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,573 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,585 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,590 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,596 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,600 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,598 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,604 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,603 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,607 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,608 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,602 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,608 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,617 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,621 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,626 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,627 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,629 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,637 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,635 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,636 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,637 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,646 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,653 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net +507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,070–13,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:0713,653+7
5 Nov 2026, 23:1613,646+9
5 Nov 2026, 02:4513,637+1
3 Nov 2026, 23:1113,636+1
2 Nov 2026, 00:2113,635-2
31 Oct 2026, 21:0613,637+8
30 Oct 2026, 21:5013,629+2
29 Oct 2026, 21:4513,627+1
27 Oct 2026, 20:0113,626+5
26 Oct 2026, 22:4013,621+4
25 Oct 2026, 22:3613,617+9
24 Oct 2026, 19:5613,608+6
23 Oct 2026, 19:0113,602-6
22 Oct 2026, 21:1713,608+1
20 Oct 2026, 17:0613,607+4
19 Oct 2026, 20:1913,603-1
18 Oct 2026, 20:4613,604+6
17 Oct 2026, 18:1113,598-2
16 Oct 2026, 18:5813,600+4
15 Oct 2026, 17:1113,596first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 13,653 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
23
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held87 (26 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total31,827
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (17.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC428 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

مع القلم البارع والمؤرّخ النيقد والمفهرس الخبير الأستاذ محمد حسين حكيم أهدأ عندما أقرأ له وانتعش بكتاباته كونها غنية بالمعلومات التراثية وديدنه أن يأتي بشيء جديد من خلال تبحره في عالم المخطوطات قبلته النسخ القديمة فهو يعيد ذكرها بقلمه ويحيي أعلامها بفكره وخبرته …..

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

5 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC947 viewsread 6 November 2026

حديث المعلّى بن خنيس مع الإمام الصادق (ع) (303ظ- 307ظ) (حديث – عربيّ) منقول من كتاب: الحسن بن الصقر بن الحسن (ق؟). حديثٌ عقائديٌّ طويلٌ في علم آل محمّدٍ صلوات الله عليهم جرى بين المعلّى بن خنيس والإمام الصادق (ع)، نُقل من كتاب (الآداب الدينيّة للخزانة المعينيّة) للطبرسيّ، الفضل بن الحسن (ت 584هـ)، والحديث بطوله غير موجود في كتاب الآداب وأجنبيٌّ عنه، ولعلّه ملحقٌ بنسخةٍ من الكتاب، والسند في أوّل النسخة ذكرته بطوله، …

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

5 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC922 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

حديث طويل بين المعلى بن خنيس والإمام الصادق ع كتب في أوله أنه من كتاب الآداب الدينية للطبرسي، والحديث بطوله الذي يبلغ أكثر من عشر صفحات غير موجود بكتاب الآداب، وهو أجنبي عن موضوع الكتاب، ورجال سنده لم أجدهم في هذه العجالة، نعم ورد في كتاب صحيفة الأبرار مرسلًا، عن كتاب سرور الموالي ومؤلفه من علماء البحرين في القرن الثاني عشر، فهل لأحد خبر أو دراسة وتحقيق عن هذا الحديث لاعرف أكثر عنه.

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

4 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

المرجان

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

3 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

1 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,870 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

كشف الظلام للشيخ محسن الأعسم الناسخ بحراني

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

1 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

نوع الغلاف لاكي

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

1 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

الانجيل مطبوع سنة ١٧٦٤م أي قبل ٢٦٢ عامًا، وهو باللغة السويدية

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

1 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

صدر من مركز النجف الأشرف للتأليف والتوثيق والنشر طباعة نسخة كتاب ( النهاية في مجرد الفقه والفتاوى) للشيخ الطوسي (ت٤٦٠هـ) بالفاكسميل، والنسخة تاريخها سنة ٥٩١هـ، وهي التجربة الثانية للمركز بعد طباعة نسخة الاستبصار بالفاكسميل. المقدمة حوت مقدمة المركز وفهرستي للنسخة ومقالة للخبير محمد حسين حكيم عن النسخة ومقالة للسيد محمد صادق الرضوي عن النسخة. والنسخة من نسخ مكتبة المدرسة الهندية بكربلاء المقدسة، والعمل بالتعاون مع مرك…

Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @ahmad1971a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ahmad1971a edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جامع الاستفتاءات / شيخ عادل ال جوهر
@adelaljohr · 21,012
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 September 2026
النجف مكتبتي|Najaf Library
@Books_Links · 74,976
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
شبكة الفكر
@alfeker · 42,714
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Ailia Emame
@AiliaEmame1185 · 22,598
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
کتابخانه جامع
@Y_1360 · 24,582
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
مكتبة ملفات كتب الشيعة
@shiabooks_pdf · 69,416
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
قناة درع المرجعية
@almarjieia · 20,378
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
مكتبة السيد علي القاضي
@ali198628 · 20,812
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 September 2026
مكتبة الخزائن الخطية والمطبوعة
@Manuscript12 · 23,835
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
قناة إكسير الحكمة
@Elixirofwisdom · 67,484
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه تهران
@UT_Central_Library · 25,132
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
العبرات الحسينية
@AlAbaratAlHosainiya · 24,811
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
كتب مكتبة الفكر [PDF Files]
@alfekerpdf · 118,700
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
العتبة العلوية المقدسة
@ImamAliNet · 85,950
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
کتابخانه اسلامی و تصوف
@erfaneeslami1 · 19,512
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 October 2026
مجموعة المخطوطات الإسلامية
@almktutat · 21,405
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
الدروس الحوزوية في النجف الأشرف
@bhbgcx · 24,875
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
الائمة الاثنا عشر
@The12ImamsWeb · 40,754
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
السيد علي القاضي
@Mahabu · 55,135
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
العتبة الرضوية المقدسة
@ImamRedaAS · 43,421
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
مكتبة آل الشيرازي الكرام
@shirazi_lib · 19,070
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
العتبة العسكرية المقدسة
@alaskrain · 23,390
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفةعلى اهل البيت(ع)
@Ahmaed202096 · 22,197
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
السيد رشيد الحسيني
@rashid_alhussainy · 51,505
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“التراث والتحقيق بين يديك” (@ahmad1971a), 13,653 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmad1971a.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.