Engagement
87 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.7%
- avg views ÷ 13,653 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,590
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 87 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (17.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
6 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC428 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
مع القلم البارع
والمؤرّخ النيقد
والمفهرس الخبير
الأستاذ محمد حسين حكيم
أهدأ عندما أقرأ له
وانتعش بكتاباته كونها غنية بالمعلومات التراثية
وديدنه أن يأتي بشيء جديد
من خلال تبحره في عالم المخطوطات
قبلته النسخ القديمة
فهو يعيد ذكرها بقلمه ويحيي أعلامها بفكره وخبرته
…..
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
5 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC947 viewsread 6 November 2026 حديث المعلّى بن خنيس مع الإمام الصادق (ع) (303ظ- 307ظ) (حديث – عربيّ)
منقول من كتاب: الحسن بن الصقر بن الحسن (ق؟).
حديثٌ عقائديٌّ طويلٌ في علم آل محمّدٍ صلوات الله عليهم جرى بين المعلّى بن خنيس والإمام الصادق (ع)، نُقل من كتاب (الآداب الدينيّة للخزانة المعينيّة) للطبرسيّ، الفضل بن الحسن (ت 584هـ)، والحديث بطوله غير موجود في كتاب الآداب وأجنبيٌّ عنه، ولعلّه ملحقٌ بنسخةٍ من الكتاب، والسند في أوّل النسخة ذكرته بطوله، …
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
5 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC922 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
حديث طويل بين المعلى بن خنيس والإمام الصادق ع كتب في أوله أنه من كتاب الآداب الدينية للطبرسي، والحديث بطوله الذي يبلغ أكثر من عشر صفحات غير موجود بكتاب الآداب، وهو أجنبي عن موضوع الكتاب، ورجال سنده لم أجدهم في هذه العجالة، نعم ورد في كتاب صحيفة الأبرار مرسلًا، عن كتاب سرور الموالي ومؤلفه من علماء البحرين في القرن الثاني عشر، فهل لأحد خبر أو دراسة وتحقيق عن هذا الحديث لاعرف أكثر عنه.
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
Channel photo updated
4 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
المرجان
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
3 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
Channel photo updated
Channel photo removed
1 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,870 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
كشف الظلام للشيخ محسن الأعسم الناسخ بحراني
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
1 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
نوع الغلاف لاكي
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
1 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
الانجيل مطبوع سنة ١٧٦٤م أي قبل ٢٦٢ عامًا، وهو باللغة السويدية
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
1 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 6 November 2026 Photo
صدر من مركز النجف الأشرف للتأليف والتوثيق والنشر طباعة نسخة كتاب ( النهاية في مجرد الفقه والفتاوى) للشيخ الطوسي (ت٤٦٠هـ) بالفاكسميل، والنسخة تاريخها سنة ٥٩١هـ، وهي التجربة الثانية للمركز بعد طباعة نسخة الاستبصار بالفاكسميل.
المقدمة حوت مقدمة المركز وفهرستي للنسخة ومقالة للخبير محمد حسين حكيم عن النسخة ومقالة للسيد محمد صادق الرضوي عن النسخة.
والنسخة من نسخ مكتبة المدرسة الهندية بكربلاء المقدسة، والعمل بالتعاون مع مرك…
Signed أحمد علي الحلي النجفي (أبو جعفر)
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @ahmad1971a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ahmad1971a edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“التراث والتحقيق بين يديك” (@ahmad1971a), 13,653 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmad1971a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.