Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جامع الاستفتاءات / شيخ عادل ال جوهر

Channel

جامع الاستفتاءات / شيخ عادل ال جوهر

@adelaljohr

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,004subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000809776
TypeChannel
Username@adelaljohr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/adelaljohr

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “الأحكام الشرعية / شيخ عادل ال جوهر — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

20,97121,01020,990.55 August 2026 — 20,971 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,971 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,972 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,971 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,975 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,974 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,976 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,974 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,987 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,984 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,988 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,992 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,991 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,987 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,994 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,998 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,995 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,993 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,992 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,997 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,004 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,007 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,001 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,008 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,007 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,010 subscribers7 September 2026 — 21,006 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,002 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,005 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,002 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,004 subscribers21,0045 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,965–21,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:4021,004+2
16 Sept 2026, 02:1821,002-3
14 Sept 2026, 05:1821,005+3
12 Sept 2026, 14:1921,002-4
7 Sept 2026, 07:3721,006-4
4 Sept 2026, 15:1821,010+3
3 Sept 2026, 01:3821,007-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:1421,008+7
1 Sept 2026, 01:3321,001-6
31 Aug 2026, 03:2221,007+3
30 Aug 2026, 03:4321,004+7
29 Aug 2026, 00:5620,997+5
28 Aug 2026, 03:0520,992-1
27 Aug 2026, 00:0420,993-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:2520,995-3
25 Aug 2026, 01:4320,998+4
23 Aug 2026, 12:2420,994+7
21 Aug 2026, 20:1720,987-4
19 Aug 2026, 16:4420,991-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:4820,992first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 21,004 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,530
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held81 (27 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total42,938
Reactions total532
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,861 reactions across 77 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,39374.9%
🙏1568.38%
👍1266.77%
💔462.47%
😢382.04%
🥰251.34%
👏150.806%
🕊140.752%
🤝120.645%
😍90.484%
😭90.484%
💯80.43%
❤‍🔥40.215%
🎉40.215%
👎10.054%
🫡10.054%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,908 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 81 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adelaljohr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 81 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC488 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

عَن الإمام الصّادق عليه السلام قالَ : إجتَنِبوا المعاصي لَيلة الجُمعة ، فإنّ السّيّئة مُضاعَفة وَالحَسَنة مُضاعَفة ، وَمَنْ تَرك مَعصية الله لَيلة الجُمعة غَفَرَ الله لَهُ كُلّ ماسَلف ، وَمَنْ بَارزَ الله لَيلة الجُمعة بِمعصية أخذهُ الله بكلّ ما عمل في عُمرهِ وَضاعفَ عَليه العَذاب بِهذهِ المَعصية . بحار الأنوار - الجزء : 86 - صفحة : 283

10👍2

Signed عادل ال جوهر

31 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,100 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

السؤال: متى وُلد النبي الأكرم (صلى الله عليه وآله)؟ الجواب: وردت في تحديد ولادته (صلى الله عليه وآله) عدّة أقوال، منها: 1- ذهب علماء الإمامية (رضوان الله عليهم) - إلا من شذّ منهم - إلى أنّ ولادته (صلى الله عليه وآله) كانت في السابع عشر من شهر ربيع الأول، وهو القول المشهور عندهم. 2- ذهب أكثر العامّة إلى أنّها كانت في الثاني عشر من ربيع الأول، وقد اختار هذا القول الشيخ الكليني (رحمه الله)، وعلّق العلامة المجلسي (رضوا

8🥰2

Signed عادل ال جوهر

31 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,970 views92 reactionsread 3 September 2026

في ذكرى مولد النبي الأعظم صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم، ومن جوار مرقد أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام، قمنا بإشراككم في ثواب زيارته وزيارة أمير المؤمنين عليهما السلام.

57🙏23👏6🥰4🕊2

Signed عادل ال جوهر

30 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC≈2,320 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

18👏1

Signed عادل ال جوهر

30 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC≈2,320 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

الغسل في المولد النبوي الشريف. ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السؤال: هل يُستحب الغسل في يوم المولد النبوي الشريف، وهل يجزئ عن الوضوء؟ ــــــــــــــــــــــــ الأجوبة: السيّد محمد سعيد الحكيم: ج-يحسن الإتيان به برجاء المطلوبية من دون أن يجتزأ به عن الوضوء. «منهاج الصالحين ،ج١،م ٣٤١» ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السيّد علي الخامنئي: ج-يؤتى به رجاءً، ولا يجزي عن الوضوء.«الموقع» ــــــــــــــــــــــــ الشيخ حسين الخراساني (الو

8😍1

Signed عادل ال جوهر

30 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,060 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

11🕊2

Signed عادل ال جوهر

30 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,190 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026

نبارك لكم مولد خاتم الأنبياء وسيد المرسلين محمد بن عبد الله صلى الله عليه وآله وحفيده الإمام أبي عبد الله جعفر بن محمد الصادق عليهما أفضل الصلاة والسلام.

26🎉3😍3

Signed عادل ال جوهر

29 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈2,680 views56 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

قال الإمام الرضا (عليه السلام): من دعا لإخوانه من المؤمنين وكّل الله به عن كلّ مؤمن ملكاً يدعو له، وما من مؤمن يدعو للمؤمنين والمؤمنات والمسلمين والمسلمات الأحياء منهم والأموات، إلّا ردّ الله عليه من كلّ مؤمن ومؤمنة حسنة، منذ بعث الله آدم (عليه السلام) إلى أن تقوم الساعة. المصدر : الدعوات ، من بحار الأنوار: ج٩٠ ، ص٣٨٧.

43🙏8👍3🥰2

Signed عادل ال جوهر

29 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈2,540 views136 reactionsread 3 September 2026

من الكاظمية المقدسة، أشركناكم في ثواب زيارة الإمامين الجوادين عليهما السلام هذه الليلة، ودعونا لكم بقضاء حوائجكم. تقبل الله طاعاتكم.

83🙏35💔8👍5🤝2😢2🫡1

Signed عادل ال جوهر

27 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈3,480 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

17🙏4

Signed عادل ال جوهر

27 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈3,260 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

أكل "الإستاكوزا" أم الروبيان. ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السؤال: ما حكم تناول "الاستاكوزا" (المعروفة أيضًا بـ "أم الربيان" أو "الكركند")؟ ــــــــــــــــــــــــ الأجوبة: السيّد محمد سعيد الحكيم: ج-إذا كان المقصود منه الروبيان يجوز أكله ، وإلاّ فلا يجوز.«الموقع» ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السيّد علي الخامنئي: ج-ان كان من جنس الروبيان يجوز أكله.«استفتاء» ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السيّد أبو القاسم الخوئي: ج-لايجوز أكل اُم

18

Signed عادل ال جوهر

26 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,900 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

أخذ الإذن من الزوجة المسلمة ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السؤال: هل يجوز للمتزوج من مسلمة أن يتزوج كتابية متعة بدون أخذ الإذن من الزوجة المسلمة؟ ــــــــــــــــــــــــ الأجوبة: السيّد محمد سعيد الحكيم: ج-لا يشترط إذنها في ذلك.«منهاج الصالحين، ج ٣، م ١١٣» ــــــــــــــــــــــــ السيّد علي الخامنئي: ج-يجوز الزواج منها في المنقطع. «الموقع» ــــــــــــــــــــــــ الشيخ حسين الخراساني (الوحيد): ج- لا يتزوج الكتابية على

14👍4🕊2

Signed عادل ال جوهر

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @adelaljohr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفةعلى اهل البيت(ع)
@Ahmaed202096 · 22,166
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
وظائف الشرقية 24 🇸🇦
@sharqiahjobs · 100,970
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جامع الاستفتاءات / شيخ عادل ال جوهر” (@adelaljohr), 21,004 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adelaljohr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.