Channel
@alwakeelhadar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,373subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001976976219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alwakeelhadar |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alwakeelhadar |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 1,373 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 1,371 | +5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 1,366 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:04 | 1,363 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 1,362 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 1,361 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 1,353 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 1,354 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,349 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 1,348 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 1,350 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 1,350 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 51.9% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 44.2% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هل مات الرسول الأعظم مسمومًا ⁉️ السؤال: هل مات رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وآله) موتًا طبيعيًّا أم تم اغتياله ؟ جواب الشيخ الوكيل دامت بركاته: الظاهر من بعض الأخبار أنه (صلى الله عليه و آله) قد اغتيل وان المرأتين سمتاه في مرضه، ولا يبعد ذلك فإنَّ في مرض الرسول الأعظم صلى الله عليه و آله أحداث فعلها المنافقون طمعًا بالدنيا .. عن عبد الصمد بن بشير عن أبي عبد الله ع قال تدرون مات النبي ص أو قتل- إن الله يقول: «أَفَإِ…
❤5👍3
[ تاريخ المولد النبوي في الكافي ] السؤال: لماذا اختار الشيخ الكليني(قدس) ما يوافق العامة، وخالف مشهور الشيعة في تاريخ ولادة النبي (صلى الله عليه وآله)؟ جواب الشيخ الوكيل دامت بركاته: تعدد الأخبار في تواريخ المعصومين عليهم السلام وارد لا يخفى واختيار أحدها ليس بقليل. 📬 جواب خاص https://t.me/alwakeelhadar
❤1👍1
المعصوم وتناول السم ❗️ السؤال: لماذا يتناول المعصوم عليه السلام السم عندما يُقدَّم إليه ؟ جواب الشيخ الوكيل دام عزّه: المعصوم عليه السلام يموت بإرادته ولا يؤثر فيه السم إلاّ حين تقتضي إرادة الله تعالى جريان ذلك. 📩جواب خاص https://t.me/alwakeelhadar
❤1👍1
File, posted without a caption
👍2
النص على الأئمة وانحراف الواقفة ❗️ السؤال: إذا كان النص على الأئمة (صلوات الله عليهم) واضحًا بل كان من قِبل النبي الأعظم (صلى الله عليه وآله) فكيف اعتقد بعض الشيعة بالوقف على الإمام الكاظم عليه السلام ونفوا إمام الرضا عليه السلام ؟ جواب الشيخ الوكيل دام عزّه: صدور الرواية لا يعني علم جميع الناس بها كما أنّ الهوى والمصالح الدنيوية لهما دورهما في إبعاد بعض الناس عن الحق، والأمر جارٍ إلى الآن رغم يسر الاطلاع على تراث …
❤2👍2
🔶نبذة من حياة الإمام الرضا صلوات الله عليه🔶 📚 أصول العقيدة للشيخ حيدر الوكيل حفظه الله
❤2
كتب الشيخ الوكيل دام عزه: تَمَثَّلَ ارتباطُ العاطفةِ بالبُعْدِ العقائديِّ في حالاتٍ متعددةٍ من أبرزِها عشرةُ محرمٍ ثم في زيارةِ الأربعينَ التي صارتْ مظهراً كبيراً من مظاهرِ عقيدةِ الشيعةِ وارتباطِهم بسيدِ الشهداءِ صلواتُ اللهِ عليهِ حيثُ الحراكُ المليونيُّ من زوارٍ وخدمٍ .. مظهرٌ لا مثيلَ لهُ من الولاءِ المرتبطِ بينَ الناسِ وإمامِهم بعفويةٍ وتنسيقٍ لا تمتدُّ لهُ يدٌ واحدةٌ بل هو تفاعلٌ عجيبٌ فالجميعُ يطلبُ رضا الله…
👍3
سؤالٌ يتكررُ .. ماذا علينا أنْ نفعلَ في زيارةِ الأربعينَ ⁉️ كتبَ الشيخ الوكيل دام عزه: في النصِّ الشريفِ تزورُ عندَ ارتفاعِ النهارِ و ذكرَ الإمامُ عليهِ السلامُ نصَّ الزيارةِ .. والمشيُ لم يردْ في خصوصِ زيارةِ الأربعينَ لكنهُ مستحبٌّ مطلقاً في زيارةِ سيدِ الشهداءِ صلواتُ اللهِ عليهِ والجمعُ بينَ الزيارةِ والمشيِ لأجلِها أكملُ من هنا فالزائرُ يكونُ متعباً لا سيما في الجوِّ الحارِّ فلا ينبغي إثقالُ كاهلِهِ بأشياءَ أخ…
❤2👍1
📌معنى الأفضلية بين المعصومين السؤال: ماهو معنى الأفضلية في أن أمير المؤمنين أفضل من بقية الأئمة (صلوات الله عليه وعليهم أجمعين) أو الإمام الحسن أفضل من أخيه الإمام الحسين(عليهما السلام)؟ جواب الشيخ حيدر الوكيل (حفظه الله): لعلَّ المراد الأكثر ثوابًا ومنزلةً عند الله تعالى.. تلك الرسل فضلنا بعضهم على بعض. https://t.me/alwakeelhadar
👍3❤2
ماهي فائدة صلح الإمام الحسن صلوات الله عليه❓️ السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته شيخنا السؤال: إذا كان معاوية لم يلتزم ببنود الصلح مع الإمام الحسن صلوات الله عليه ، فماهي الفائدة من هذا الصلح للشيعة في وقتها؟ جواب الشيخ حيدر الوكيل حفظه الله: عليكم السلام و رحمة الله وبركاته أولاً .. إقامة الحجة عليه أمام الناس فكل ما يفعله خلافا لبنود الصلح ظلم وجور منه لعنه الله تعالى.. ثانيًا .. تم الحفاظ على جمع غفير من أصحاب ال…
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
[ أسئلة حول نص زيارة الأربعين أجاب عنها الشيخ الأستاذ دامت بركاته ] 🔷️السؤال: لدينا أسئلة تخص زيارة الأربعين الواردة عن الإمام الصادق صلوات الله عليه التي رواها الشيخ الطوسي في المصباح والتهذيب الأول: مامعنى ( وأعطيته مواريث الأنبياء) كيف أن مواريث الأنبياء كانت عند الإمام سيد الشهداء صلوات الله عليه ؟ الثاني: كيف نفهم عبارة( وبذل مهجته فيك ليستنقذ عبادك من الجهالة وحيرة الضلالة) مع أن أغلب سكان العالم اليوم ليس…
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @alwakeelhadar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوائد الشيخ حيدر الوكيل” (@alwakeelhadar), 1,373 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alwakeelhadar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.