File, posted without a caption

Channel
مجموعة المخطوطات الإسلامية
@almktutat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,107subscribers
+169 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001579168354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @almktutat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/almktutat |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 21,107 | +10 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 21,097 | +15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 21,082 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 21,087 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 21,092 | +10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 21,082 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 21,078 | +14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 21,064 | +17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 21,047 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:25 | 21,049 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 21,050 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 21,051 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 21,043 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 21,041 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 21,037 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 21,049 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 21,043 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 21,047 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 21,048 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 21,036 | first reading |
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.36%
- avg views ÷ 21,107 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 921
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (30 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 12,890 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 31s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
مخطوطة تُحقق لأول مرة أربعون حديثاً في فضل القرآن وتعلّمه وتعليمه. مسند طرابلس الشام الشيخ العلامة أحمد بن سليمان الخالدي الأروادي الطرابلسي (نحو ١٢٧٥هـ). حققه: د. إياد العكيلي
Photo, posted without a caption
ماذا تضيف أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي فوق ما عندك؟ عندك الشاملة، وعندك ملفات PDF، وعندك محركات البحث. فلماذا تحتاج أداة ذكاء اصطناعي أصلاً؟ السؤال وجيه، والجواب أن ما تضيفه ليس البحث، بل ما بعده. وهذه طبقاته: الأولى: البحث عن كلمة. عندك أصلاً في الشاملة وأتقن مما في أي أداة أخرى. لا جديد فيها. الثانية: البحث عن معنى لا عن لفظ. الشاملة تجد لك «الكاغد» حيث كُتبت هكذا فقط. أما إن سألت: أين تحدّث المؤلف عن مواد الكتابة؟ فس…
File, posted without a caption
"المؤلفات في طبقات الشافعية وتراجمهم دراسة ببليوغرافية للطبعات والتحقيقات وأماكن النسخ الخطية" هذا عنوان بحث محكم نشر لي حديثا بالعدد الحادي عشر من مدونة الدراسات التي تصدر عن المنتدى الإسلامي بالشارقة ، تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى حصر ووصف مؤلفات طبقات الشافعية عبر التاريخ، باعتبارها المصدر الأول لتاريخ المذهب وتراجم رجاله، ولكثرة هذه المصنفات وتنوع طرق تأليفها وحاجة الباحثين لمعرفة حالها، فهي بحاجة إلى قائمة جامعة تصف …
قيمة كتابي عبدالسلام هارون و صلاح الدين المنجد بين كتب تحقيق المخطوطات ... (مقالات مهداة لصلاح الدين المنجد ص٥٥) https://t.me/konashaadel/646
مكملات التحقيق القبلية تقوم صنعةُ تحقيق النُّصوص التراثية على توظيف المحقِّق لملكاته البحثية ومهاراته العلمية عبر منظومة من الإجراءات المنهجية الدقيقة الموزَّعة على مراحل متتابعة، وتمثِّل «مكملات التحقيق القبلية» حجرَ الزاوية في هذه المنظومة، إذ تضم جملةً من الخطوات الإجرائية التي تُمهّد السبيل للشروع في التعامل العلمي مع النص التراثي. للتسجيل بالدورة : https://forms.gle/gXEncHrX8U3j3Six8
ظهور إجازات السماع، وانتقالها مع ظهور مراكز العلم صلاح الدين المنجد / إجازات السماع في المخطوطات القديمة / ص 487 (ضمن مجموع على المخطوط العربي) https://t.me/konashaadel/647
•• مزايا المخطوطات القيمة والنادرة : تجارة المخطوطات وطرق فحصها وتقيمها، د.عابد المشوخي، ص 166-169 https://t.me/konashaadel/649
"شرح القسطلاني على صحيح مسلم ونسخه الخطية، دراسة وصفية تحليلية"
مقارنة بين المكتبات عندنا وعند الاوربيين و آمريكا تاريخ نفتخر به ( دراسات في الكتب والمكتبات، ص 13-14) https://t.me/konashaadel/651
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @almktutat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@konashaadel · 5,28216 postsفي المخطوطات والتراث - مدونة محمود زكي
@KunnashaZakiya · 2286 postsتقييدات المطالعات في المطبوعات والمخطوطات
@mohammedomaralkaf · 8,3064 postsلتعليم قراءة المخطوطات (أحمد ممدوح)
@naskh_makhtotat · 2,2013 postsموروث العراق العلمي
@HeritageofIraq · 18,9522 postsفهرسة المخطوطات - ضياء الدين جعرير
@fahrasa · 2,9132 postsقناة د. حاتم فتح الله
@hatimelatary · 3172 postsمعهد المخطوطات العربية
@malecso · 3,3621 postد. محمد بن عبدالله السريّع
@msurayyi · 2,2621 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Manuscript12 · 22,401
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
@libraryalIraqi · 23,616
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@manthomah1443 · 25,318
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@Ba7ith2 · 46,220
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@dewan55 · 29,488
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
@qra_at · 27,195
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
@tafsircenter · 65,200
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@Mishref_History · 39,240
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
@thesesdz2 · 38,001
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
@Mishref_Quran · 61,518
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@quwaa · 28,382
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
@mobliq · 44,770
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@waqfeya_pdf · 34,246
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
@Mozkrat4prim · 47,327
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
@HISTORY_SY · 29,406
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@NewBooksAndEditions · 52,198
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
@faharisalkutub · 49,345
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
@Tihama_books · 35,570
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@librarypdf1 · 465,872
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@L_alnader7 · 22,437
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
@ktbmfid · 75,679
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
@arabicpdfs1 · 60,116
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@Al_Hadeeth · 41,030
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
@taswkut · 33,337
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجموعة المخطوطات الإسلامية” (@almktutat), 21,107 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almktutat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.