Channel
@tafsircenter
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
65,200subscribers
-366 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001088512242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tafsircenter |
| Description | الريادة في تطوير الدراسات القرآنية https://linktr.ee/tafsir.net |
| Created | 15 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tafsircenter |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @tafsiroqs/200325 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC | @tafsircenter/5642 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | 15 hours |
| @tafsiroqs/200426 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC | @tafsircenter/5645 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC | 1.00 | 15 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tafsiroqs | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 15 hours | @tafsiroqs (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 24 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @tafsiroqs. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 65,200 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 65,232 | -26 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 65,258 | -24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 65,282 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 65,283 | -20 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 65,303 | -29 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 65,332 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:03 | 65,348 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:54 | 65,358 | -23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 65,381 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 65,399 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 65,411 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 65,412 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 65,413 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 65,420 | -22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 65,442 | +23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 65,419 | -19 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 65,438 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 65,458 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 65,466 | first reading |
94 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 94 (26 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 121,912 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
تتناول هذه المقالةُ الطباقَ البياني في القرآن بوصفه تلاحمًا بين البيان والبديع، انطلاقًا من كون التضاد ليس زخرفًا لفظيًّا، بل أداة تصويرية تُعمِّق المعنى. فتُعرِّف بالطباق وتُسلِّط الضوء عليه في إطار التصوير القرآني، كما تمثِّل له في الأمثال القرآنية ورسم المشاهد في الآيات، وتختم ببعض صور الطباق الخفيّ. https://tafsir.net/articles/24746 #مركز_تفسير
يسر مركز تفسير للدراسات القرآنية أن يُعلن عن إطلاق موقع «الاستشارات القرآنية»؛ المنصة الرقمية التي تجمع ثمرة أكثر من عشر سنوات من العطاء العلمي لمبادرة الاستشارات القرآنية، وتضع بين أيديكم حصيلة تتجاوز 18 ألف استشارة محررة أجاب عنها ثمانون مستشاراً من أبرز المتخصصين. ندعوكم لزيارة الموقع، وجعله رفيقاً لكم في مدارستكم وتدبركم لكتاب الله تعالى. رابط الموقع: https://consquran.com
يدرس هذا البحث (مفردة يعقوب) لابن شريح بجَمْعِ أوجهها المخالِفة لِمَا في الدرة والطيبة في فرش الحروف من سورة المؤمنون إلى آخر القرآن الكريم، ويخلص إلى نتائج تتعلّق بقدر المخالفات غير المقروء بها. https://tafsir.net/researchs/24845 #مركز_تفسير
✨ بدأ البث المباشر للقاء #نادي_تفسير 📚 عرض ومناقشة كتاب: «كتاب السبعة لابن مجاهد» 🎙 مع محقق الكتاب: أ.د. خلف بن حسين الجبوري أستاذ اللغة والقراءات القرآنية بجامعة تكريت سابقاً رابط البث: https://www.youtube.com/live/v3Uve1Wj0K0?si=RJgdt_tGhsgVRJvg 📌 نستقبل أسئلتكم واستفساراتكم للضيف أثناء البث المباشر من خلال: ١. الرسائل الخاصة في قناة التيليجرام: https://t.me/tafsibc ٢. وسم #لقاءات_النادي على منصة إكس (تويتر سابق…
اهتمت الدراسات الغربية للقرآن -منذ نشأتها- بدراسة الترتيب التاريخي لسور القرآن، وإعداد لوائح تعيد ترتيب السور بطريقة زمنية تعاقبية، وانتهجت في هذا طرائق مختلفة، تحاول هذه الدراسة قراءة محاولات الترتيب الزمني للقرآن، كما تقدم منظورًا لاعتبار عملية الترتيب هذه عملية تأويلية. https://tafsir.net/translations/24745 #مركز_تفسير
✨ نسعد بمتابعتكم الليلة لقاء #نادي_تفسير 📚 عرض ومناقشة إصدار #مركز_تفسير للدراسات القرآنية، كتاب: «كتاب السبعة لابن مجاهد» 🎙 مع محقق الكتاب: أ.د. خلف بن حسين الجبوري أستاذ اللغة والقراءات القرآنية بجامعة تكريت سابقاً 💻 بث مباشر (عن بُعد) 📅 يومنا هذا الإثنين: ١٠ ربيع الآخر ١٤٤٨هـ الموافق: ٢١ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ م ⏰ الساعة: ٨:٣٠ مساءً بتوقيت مكة المكرمة 💬 نستقبل أسئلتكم واستفساراتكم لضيفنا محقق الكتاب أثناء اللقاء المباشر…
يتجدد لقاؤنا بكم في #نادي_تفسير 📚 لعرض ومناقشة أحد إصدارات #مركز_تفسير للدراسات القرآنية، كتاب: «كتاب السبعة لابن مجاهد» 🎙مع محققه: أ.د. خلف بن حسين الجبوري أستاذ اللغة والقراءات القرآنية بجامعة تكريت سابقاً 💻 لقاء مباشر (عن بُعد) 📅 يوم الإثنين: ١٠ ربيع الآخر ١٤٤٨هـ الموافق: ٢١ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ م ⏰ الساعة: ٨:٣٠ مساءً بتوقيت مكة المكرمة 💬 ونسعد باستقبال أسئلتكم واستفساراتكم لضيفنا مؤلف الكتاب أثناء اللقاء المباشر عب…
يدور هذا الحوار العلمي مع د/ عبد الملك هيباوي، حول إسهامات أبرز دارسي القرآن في السياق الألماني، أي: تيودور نولدكه، فيلقي الضوء على كتابه (تاريخ القرآن)، ومنهجه، والقضايا التي تناولها، كذلك يلقي الضوء على الأثر الكبير الذي تركه هذا الكتاب على حقل الدراسات القرآنية الغربية. https://tafsir.net/interviews/24822 #مركز_تفسير
لابن جرير الطبري في تفسيره عنايةٌ خاصّة بنقد التفسير، وهذه المقالة تتناول مسلكَيْن ظاهرَيْن من مسالك نقد التفسير عنده، وهما: النقض والمعارضة، وذلك بالتعريف بكلٍّ منهما وبيان صور توظيفه لهما في النقد من خلال تفسيره، وهي مستلّة من كتاب (الصناعة النقدية في تفسير ابن جرير الطبري). https://tafsir.net/articles/24743 #مركز_تفسير
في هذه المقالة نقدِّم عددًا من ملخّصات الدراسات المنشورة في بعض المجلات العلمية الغربية المعاصرة، من أجلِ لفتِ أنظار الباحثين إلى أهم ما يُنشر في هذه الدوريات العلمية حول القرآن الكريم وعلومه. https://tafsir.net/papers/24820 #مركز_تفسير
تبحث هذه المقالة في صحة الثناء المنسوب إلى ابن حجر العسقلاني على كتاب (البرهان) لبدر الدين الزركشي كما ورَدَ في (إنباء الغمر بأبناء العمر)، فتبدأ بإيراد المؤلَّفات والدراسات التي أوردتْ هذا الثناء، ثم تبحث مدى ثبوت هذا الثناء عن ابن حجر من خلال تتبّع الطبعات والمخطوطات. https://tafsir.net/articles/24735 #مركز_تفسير
يعد الاستشراق الألماني من أهم المدارس الاستشراقية في دراسات القرآن، وقد اتسم بملامح خاصة تتصل بأسباب ومسارات نشأته وتطوره، كذلك فإن الاستشراق الألماني مستمر التأثير على ساحة الدراسات القرآنية الغربية، سواء بكُتبه المركزية التي لا يزال لها أهميتها في الحقل، أو بالإسهامات الجديدة التي يقدمها دارسون معاصرون. يتناول هذا الحوار مع د/ عبد الملك هيباوي منهج الاستشراق الألماني في دراسات القرآن، والآثار التي تركها على دراسة ا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @tafsircenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مركز تفسير للدراسات القرآنية” (@tafsircenter), 65,200 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tafsircenter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.