(📚✏فوائد✏📚) ( #أفكار_بحثية_مخطوطات ) ( مخطوطات القرآن وعلومه في مركز الماجد في-977 ص- فيها-2680- مخطوطة ) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CP8urFnks3JeyYNqxxDgLzbNoL2LFrw2/view?usp=drivesdk

Channel
أفكار بحثية
@afkarbahthea
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,351subscribers
+194 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001486567151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @afkarbahthea |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/afkarbahthea |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 26,351 | +5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 26,346 | +11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 26,335 | +19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 26,316 | +47 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 26,269 | +13 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 26,256 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 26,245 | +11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 26,234 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:08 | 26,230 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 26,226 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 26,223 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 26,210 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 26,208 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 26,207 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 26,203 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 26,207 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 26,201 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 26,210 | +9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 26,201 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 26,189 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.90%
- avg views ÷ 26,351 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,290
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (24 July 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,290 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 1m 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 91.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#فكرة_بحثية_فقهية@afkarbahthea المسائل التي خالف فيها ابن عثيمين شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: دراسة فقهية مقارنة
#أفكار_بحثية_متنوعة #تصلح_أطاريح_دكتوراه #تصلح_رسائل_ماجستير #تصلح_أبحاث_ترقية رحم الله الدكتور عدنان زرزور رحمة واسعة، وجزاه عن القرآن والعلم والدعوة خير الجزاء. ومن الوفاء لأهل العلم بعد رحيلهم أن تُقرأ آثارهم، وتُدرس جهودهم، ويُعرَّف بها طلاب العلم؛ ولذلك أدعو الباحثين إلى العناية بتراثه، ولا سيما في مجالَي التفسير وعلوم القرآن والفكر الإسلامي... ومن العناوين المقترحة: (1) [جهود عدنان زرزور في التفسير وعلوم ال…
❤5
#النعيم_المعجّل: مرة بعد أخرى؛ وبين الحين والحين، نذكّر كل طالب علم نبيه أن يضع نسخة من هذا البرنامج على حاسوبه، ثم يختار آية في اليوم على الأقل وينظر في التفاسير المرتية حسب وفاة أصحابها، سينتقل من تفسير إلى آخر، ومن لون إلى لون، ومن قرن إلى قرن، ومن منهج إلى منهج، ستقف يا أخي ساعتئذ على كنوز معرفية تعد ولا تحصى. دوّن ما تراه مفيدًا في كراسة خاصة أو كناشة تلغرام ، ولن تفارق هذه الدنيا إلا وقد بلغت المنتهى في فهم ك…
❤8
#فائدة_بحثية #قاف QafAI ... أداة ذكية للبحث في المصادر الإسلامية #يتيح التطبيق طرح الأسئلة المتعلقة بالمسائل الشرعية والأحكام الفقهية، ويقدم إجابات مستندة إلى كمٍّ واسع من الكتب والمراجع، مع ميزة مهمة للباحث وطالب العلم، وهي الإحالة إلى المصادر الأصلية وربط الإجابة بموضعها من الكتاب؛ مما يجعل الرجوع إلى النص والتحقق منه أكثر سهولة. #ومن أبرز ما يميز «قاف» أنه يجمع بين سرعة الوصول إلى المعلومة، والاستفادة من التراث…
❤11👏1
فكرة بحثية أصولية مقاصدية: (الاجتهاد بين دلالة النص اللفظية الظنية والمصالح المعتبرة) والمقصود بدلالة النص اللفظية الظنية: الدلالة التي يفيدها لفظ النص مع احتمالها لأكثر من وجه، فتتسع حينئذٍ دائرة النظر والاجتهاد في فهمها وترجيحها. أما المصالح المعتبرة فهي المستفادة من مجموع النصوص الأخرى ودلالاتها ومعانيها، وبهذا يتبين أهمية تقييد الدلالة في العنوان بـ"اللفظية"؛ لتمييز الدلالة اللفظية للنص عن الدلالة المعنوية المصلح…
❤3
فكرة بحثية فقهية: (الأحكام الفقهية المستنبطة من الأخبار الغيبية عن الشيطان في النصوص الشرعية) وتشمل: الأخبار الواردة عن الشيطان في القرآن والسنة، وما اشتملت عليه من أفعال وأحوال وأوصاف غيبية، وجمع الأحكام الفقهية التي استنبطها الفقهاء منها ولم يرد فيها حكمٌ صريحٌ في النص. مثل استنباط اختيار الصيِّت من المؤذنين من فرار الشيطان عند الأذان. فقد ذكر الوزير ابن هبيرة في شرحه لحديث: «إِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ إِذَا نُودِيَ بِالصّ…
❤1
لديّ فكرة بحثية حديثية تتعلق بدراسة شبهات المستشرقين وأعداء السنة النبوية والرد عليها ردًّا علميًا منهجيًّا، وهي فكرة تصلح لأن تكون موضوعًا لرسالة ماجستير. ويحتاج هذا المشروع إلى باحثٍ واسع الاطلاع على تراث المستشرقين وكتاباتهم ودراساتهم، ومتمكن من تتبع مقالاتهم وكتبهم ومناهجهم الفكرية، ومعرفة أبرز رواد المدرسة الاستشراقية واتجاهاتها في نقد السنة النبوية. يمكنني مساعدة الباحث في جرد أبرز الشبهات والمسائل التي أثار…
❤9
#أفكار_حديثية #أفكار_فقهية #افكار_جديدة #تصلح_رسائل_ماجستير #تصلح_أطاريح_دكتوراه #تصلح_أبحاث_ترقية ابنُ التين الصفاقسي المتوفي سنة (611هـ) من أعلام المحدثين وهو من فقهاء المالكية، وصاحبُ شرحٍ نفيسٍ على صحيح البخاري، أفاد منه الحافظ ابن حجر في «فتح الباري» إفادةً واسعة. وقد أورد ابن حجر في «فتح الباري» مئات الآراء والنقول عن ابن التين، ناقلًا عنه ومناقشًا ومتعقبًا له في مواضع متعددة. ومع فقدان معظم شرح ابن التين، تغد…
❤6
فكرة بحثية حديثية: (القواعد العقدية في فهم أخبار الشيطان الغيبية الواردة في القرآن والسنة النبوية) ومن أمثلتها: الأصل في أخبار الغيب إثباتها على ظاهرها، الغيب لا يثبت إلا بدليل صحيح من كتاب أو سنة، عدم إدراك الكيفية لا يقتضي نفي الحقيقة، كل ما صح به الخبر عن الله ورسوله في باب الغيب وجب قبوله والتسليم له، الأصل في الأخبار الخبرية الحقيقة، ولا يُصار إلى المجاز إلا بقرينة معتبرة، إثبات الأسباب الغيبية لا ينافي إثبات ال…
👍5
فكرة بحثية حديثية: (منهج المحدثين في تفسير الأخبار الغيبية عن الشيطان الواردة بألفاظٍ حسيةٍ) وهي نوعان: أخبار تتعلق بتأثير الشيطان في الإنسان: بالُ الشيطان في أذنه، ويعقد على قافية رأسه ثلاث عقد، ويبيت على خيشومه، ويجري من ابن آدم مجرى الدم، ويمس المولود حين يولد. وأخبار تتعلق بأحوال الشيطان وأفعاله: يضع عرشه على الماء، ويخنس عند ذكر الله، ويضحك من التثاؤب، ويفر عند سماع الأذان وله حُصاص، ويدني منه من فرّق بين المرء …
❤5
فكرة بحثية تفسيرية: (وسائل الشيطان في إضلال الإنسان الواردة في القرآن الكريم: دراسة تفسيرية موضوعية) وتشمل: الوسوسة، والتزيين، والوعد، والتمني، والتخويف، والصد، والإزلال، والإغواء، والنزغ، والاستفزاز، والاستهواء، والإنساء، والتلبيس، والأمر بالفحشاء، والأمر بالبخل، والدعوة إلى الكفر والشرك، وإثارة العداوة والبغضاء، وغير ذلك من الوسائل التي كشفها القرآن وبيَّن سبل الوقاية منها. #فكرة_بحثية_كل_يوم_جمعة @AL_yaseen11
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @afkarbahthea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dardashaat · 20,995#1
@resalaiu · 15,371#2
@DSDazzahrani · 12,178#3
@dralhoshan · 8,089#4
@Drakramnemrawi · 5,675#5
@abymhmad · 13,129#6
@D_R1122 · 6,750#7
@feqh_DrARAB · 3,701#8
@alwafaResearch · 5,833#9
@fahad20201441 · 6,185#10
@mihad_osol · 19,273#11
@Islamic_faith3 · 15,414#12
@kashaf_Q · 4,594#13
@KNASH333 · 19,867#14
@TAKNEYAT · 6,757#15
@InterdisciplinaryResearch · 3,426#16
@Al_eilm · 17,777#17
@at6MT · 18,259#18
@Jalbani · 19,047#19
@monaqasht · 13,084#20
@almaktaba7adeeth · 7,240#21
@kwaterosolia · 6,050#22
@mergebooks · 30,276#23
@Dralderes · 37,033#24
@takhreg · 6,685#25
@alkhalil_1 · 34,819#26
@fhashmy · 5,601#27
@Maqsed · 2,282#28
@Erth_n · 10,367#29
@D_R1112 · 3,292#30
@gassanc4 · 4,404#31
@Shatharat_DrFahd · 3,168#32
@alwaseela1 · 6,232#33
@EO5Q5dqEkN02Yzg8 · 1,849#34
@estelahhadeth · 5,864#35
@Researcher009 · 7,655#36
@mahabir · 5,721#37
@Abdulrahman_AlMoshed · 8,209#38
@salafcenter · 8,997#39
@Soanhalkhoater · 5,210#40
@FighBooks · 44,611#41
@Algoayme · 44,732#42
@AHL7DETH · 5,086#43
@tahmilkutubwarosaililmiyah · 56,329#44
@master12121 · 3,530#45
@twsiah · 1,656#46
@fanar3lmi · 1,675#47
@ANWAR1122 · 3,946#48
@taheralassuity · 12,698#49
@salaftime · 30,563#50
@fwaed1447 · 8,965#51
@dr_nabilbelhi21 · 22,408#52
@NewBooksAndEditions · 52,198#53
@alkinasha · 4,430#54
@ibntaymiiya · 6,823#55
@word08 · 6,087#56
@rrryaadd · 1,753 (as read 12 September 2026)#57
@VRO2030 · 2,613#58
@ktbmfid · 75,679#59
@HADETHE_NET · 2,813#60
@Alosol1444 · 8,853#61
@moh396 · 12,295#62
@monakshatquran · 2,010#63
@msurayyi · 2,262#64
@taswkut · 33,337#65
@alfikh · 14,426#66
@alhattab_iu · 9,752#67
@SulimanAlnajran · 10,242#68
@AL_yaseen11 · 4,632#69
@ibrahim_almdehesh · 22,852#70
@Alhanabla · 11,726#71
@taasisousoli · 12,974#72
@fharsm · 10,044#73
@tr728 · 22,084#74
@drasatolya · 73,044#75
@boyu3e · 10,645#76
@sutanalomairi · 37,469#77
@mkhtotatona · 15,092#78
@almktutat · 21,107#79
@abd1429 · 10,387#80
@faqeh77 · 20,054#81
@Thaeralhallak · 17,763#82
@ahlullhadith · 6,077#83
@Moswarat1 · 22,682#84
@ayedh1 · 16,150#85
@dr_alsaady · 13,635#86
@assdais · 23,387#87
@buhuthfiqh · 16,326#88
@makknzz · 16,958#89
@pworddcs · 15,727#90
@ayma2345 · 10,203#91
@manthomah1443 · 25,318#92
@almeshkat2023 · 34,277#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@libraryalIraqi · 23,616
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@isaonlinenet · 40,216
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
@Ba7ith2 · 46,220
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@tafsircenter · 65,200
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@manthomah1443 · 25,318
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@FighBooks · 44,611
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
@drasatolya · 73,044
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@bahith_word · 27,885
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
@fu1sa · 107,168
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@qodorat2 · 86,892
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@schoolsksajobs · 94,036
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
@thesesdz2 · 38,001
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أفكار بحثية” (@afkarbahthea), 26,351 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afkarbahthea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.