Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 48 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,175–9,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 20:42
9,288
+31
17 Sept 2026, 03:01
9,257
+67
13 Sept 2026, 07:21
9,190
-8
9 Sept 2026, 01:37
9,198
-13
3 Sept 2026, 08:56
9,211
-10
31 Aug 2026, 05:42
9,221
-15
28 Aug 2026, 08:32
9,236
+5
25 Aug 2026, 01:32
9,231
-11
21 Aug 2026, 04:06
9,242
-7
18 Aug 2026, 13:05
9,249
-7
15 Aug 2026, 03:05
9,256
-10
11 Aug 2026, 09:52
9,266
-17
7 Aug 2026, 23:06
9,283
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:01
9,286
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.64%
avg views ÷ 9,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
245
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
42 (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
1,960
Reactions total
84
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
697 reactions across 39 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
227
32.6%
❤
189
27.1%
👍
95
13.6%
🔥
85
12.2%
🤣
43
6.17%
💯
23
3.30%
👏
20
2.87%
💔
9
1.29%
😢
5
0.717%
👌
1
0.143%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌀ИНТЕРАКТИВ "АССОЦИАЦИИ"
📍Дорогие знатоки, предлагаю снова поиграть в одну очень увлекательную игру и проверить, насколько далеко может зайти образное мышление наших подписчиков 🤣
❗️Итак, каждый следующий участник должен написать в комментариях одно любое существительное, которое у него ассоциируется со словом предыдущего участника.
Например, ряд ассоциаций может выглядеть так:
1 участник: цветок
2 участник: дача…
👩🍳РУБРИКА "ПРИЯТНОГО АППЕТИТА или что едят герои литературы?"🧑🍳
🐡 Рыба по-креольски от Скарлетт О`Хара
"Лучше всего в Новом Орлеане была еда. Когда Скарлетт вспоминала о страшных голодных днях в Таре и о совсем еще недавней поре воздержания, ей казалось, что она никогда вдоволь не наестся этих вкусных блюд. Суп из стручков бамии, коктейль из креветок, голуби в вине и устрицы, запеченные в хрустящем тесте со смета…
Как ясен август, нежный и спокойный,
Сознавший мимолетность красоты.
Позолотив древесные листы,
Он чувства заключил в порядок стройный.
В нем кажется ошибкой полдень знойный,
С ним больше сродны грустные мечты,
Прохлада, прелесть тихой простоты
И отдыха от жизни беспокойной.
В последний раз, пред острием серпа,
Красуются колосья наливные,
Взамен цветов везде плоды земные.
Отраден вид тяжелого снопа,
А в небе журав…
☠☠☠ РУБРИКА "НА СМЕРТНОМ ОДРЕ"
🕊 АФАНАСИЙ АФАНАСЬЕВИЧ ФЕТ
🕊 Афанасий Фет скончался 21 ноября 1892 года в Москве в собственном доме на Плющихе. Причина смерти, согласно официальной версии, — сердечный приступ (обширный инфаркт). Однако существуют также версии о самоубийстве или попытке самоубийства.
🕊 Здоровье Фета начало заметно ухудшаться с 1888 года. Он страдал от прогрессирующей одышки, сердечной недостаточнос…
Укажите варианты ответов, в которых есть фразеологизм.
1) У него холодные глаза и влажные клыки величиной с палец.22%
2) Он рычал, а она называла ласковыми именами, словно перед ней был беспомощный щенок.9%
3) Её голос понравился Урсу, пришёлся ему по душе.64%
4) Кэт подолгу стояла на морозе, а Урс сидел на снегу и смотрел на неё сквозь шерстяные сосульки.16%
5) Он с одного жулика сорвал штаны и покусал его будь здоров.52%
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ничего мы тогда не знали,
Нас баюкала тишина,
Мы цветы полевые рвали
И давали им имена.
А когда мы ложились поздно,
Нам казалось, что лишь для нас
Загорались на небе звезды
В первый раз и в последний раз.
...Пусть не все нам сразу дается,
Пусть дорога жизни крута,
В нас до старости остается
Первозданная простота.
Ни во чьей (и не в нашей) власти
Ощутить порою ее,
Но в минуты большого счастья
Обновляется бытие,
И …
❤13👏6
Signed Dasha
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @NEtipichnayaychilka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Укажите варианты ответов, в которых есть фразеологизм.
1) У него холодные глаза и влажные клыки величиной с палец.22%
2) Он рычал, а она называла ласковыми именами, словно перед ней был беспомощный щенок.9%
3) Её голос понравился Урсу, пришёлся ему по душе.64%
4) Кэт подолгу стояла на морозе, а Урс сидел на снегу и смотрел на неё сквозь шерстяные сосульки.16%
5) Он с одного жулика сорвал штаны и покусал его будь здоров.52%
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мир Светланы Ткачёвой @tkacheva_svetlanaN · 26,221 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
Я люблю русский язык @rus_yaz_tg · 22,734 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
«Русский язык и литература. Находка для учителя!» 📖 @MonikaRusYaz · 21,437 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
Инфоурок @infourok · 31,926 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Юлия Нефёдова. Уроки русского @uunefedova_russ · 57,207 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Все об образовании @tyt_hudeem · 49,534 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Подготовка к ВПР, ОГЭ и ЕГЭ @iaege · 28,965 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
У Светланы ЛОДиСВЕТ 🌺 @LODiSvetSad · 27,191 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Классный руководитель | Школа @klassrukov · 21,487 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
Играй и учи @igrai_i_uchi · 24,877 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
Педагоги с чувством юмора 🤣 @gotovim_vkusnyashki_doma · 35,386 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
videouroki.net @videouroki_net · 27,261 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТИПИЧНЫЙ ФИЛОЛОГ ️️” (@NEtipichnayaychilka), 9,288 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEtipichnayaychilka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.