Channel
@lenapsycholog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,653subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001329227235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lenapsycholog |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lenapsycholog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 1,653 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 1,661 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 1,664 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 1,670 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 1,666 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 1,662 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 1,671 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,668 | +16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 1,652 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 1,638 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 1,641 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 1,641 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
312 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 196 | 62.8% | |
| 👍 | 48 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 9.29% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 5.77% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 5.45% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Готовлю программу выездного семинара "Мужество быть собой". Есть эффективное упражнение, которое заставляет задуматься и распознать: "Кто Я?" Кто не сможет поехать на выездной, но интересно разобраться в этой теме, предлагаю такое упражнение 👇 Если вы уберете все социальные маски, статусы и роли, и примете факт, что через сто лет вас точно не будет, - что именно сегодня вы готовы делать не ради результата, а ради т…
Сегодня начался "Мастерский курс" Сергея Насибяна, в котором принимаю участие. Эта мысль сделала мой день: "Мастер знает, что он мастер и никому ничего не доказывает". Действительно, мастер живет своей жизнью, в первую очередь для себя. А когда мы начинаем что-то кому-то доказывать, то в такие моменты живем для других и теряем себя.
💯7
- Я никогда не планировал так далеко! – говорил потенциальный участник групповых встреч. Если слышу, что человеку сложно планировать свою жизнь в долгосрочной перспективе, то понимаю, что это не про его «ленивость» или «безвольность». Чаще всего за этим стоят мощные психологические защиты и прошлый травматический опыт. У многих долгосрочные группы вызывают сильное сопротивление, тревогу и самосаботаж. Группы, котор…
❤12🔥2
Давно не была в кино, а тут супруг пригласил: - Давай на «Одиссею» сходим? Я согласилась, хотя прохладно отношусь к историческим картинам. Шла без каких-либо ожиданий. Настораживало то, что фильм идет почти три часа – если будет неинтересно, то сложно высидеть. Но все оказалось иначе. До сих пор нахожусь под впечатлением. Когда вышла из зала, даже не вспомнила про телефон. Не хотелось, чтобы захватила суета реальной…
❤21
Сегодня у моего папы день рождения. Ему 82 года! Рада, что смогла наладить отношения с ним. На душе легко 🧡
❤22👍6
Последний день стартовой цены! БЕРУ!
Коллега пишет 👆🏼 Тратите много времени и денег на терапию? Приходите! Помогу сэкономить 💰
4 августа. Москва Встреча «Открытый диалог» В течение трех часов отвечаю на любые ваши вопросы. КУПИТЬ БИЛЕТ
❤3
Ира. Работала там, где ей не нравилось. Терпела. Злилась. Но продолжала ездить «за тридевять земель» - надо было себя обеспечивать. Потом увольнение, сложности с деньгами. Но Ира не сдавалась, а продолжала искать то место, которое хотела, где ей было бы интересно. И она нашла его! Иногда не верится, что быть счастливым легко, но это возможно. И подтверждают это реальные истории людей.
🔥11👍8❤4
Хороший учитель - как свеча: он сгорает сам, чтобы осветить путь другим. Похоже на "профессиональный суицид", который завернут в красивый фантик. Здесь "хороший" равно "одноразовый" - зажег, осветил путь, сгорел, и списан со счетов, потому что выгорел и нечего дать другим. Следующим ученикам нужен новый учитель. "Если я сгорю, то что я понесу?" - написал в комментариях учитель. И ведь это правда. Учитель, который о…
❤29🔥1
Согласны? ☝🏻
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @lenapsycholog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Согласны? ☝🏻
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
У меня к вам неожиданный, а может быть, неудобный вопрос: вы всегда делаете то, что обещали?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Гусева, психолог” (@lenapsycholog), 1,653 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenapsycholog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.