File, posted without a caption
❤4👍3🤔1

Channel
@NeuroMetric
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,751subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001583447554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NeuroMetric |
| Created | 5 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NeuroMetric |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 1,751 | +6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 1,745 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 1,742 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 1,741 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 1,742 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 1,743 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 1,745 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 1,740 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 1,738 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 1,736 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,735 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,736 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,736 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
169 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 70.4% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 18.3% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 11.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
❤4👍3🤔1
Информация для тех, кто занимается моделированием для изучения болезней Альцгеймера и Паркинсона, ну и эпилепсии 1. Новый научный open-access журнал Brain Network Disorders https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/brain-network-disorders ❗️До 31 декабря 2028 года публикация статей бесплатна. 2. Свежая обзорная статья по вычислительному моделированию нейродегенеративных заболеваний: H. Shaheen, R. Melnik, Brain netw…
❤5👍3🤔1
ИИ-инструменты, рекомендуемые ВШЭ, для помощи в исследовательской работе, подготовке статей и преподавании: https://academics.hse.ru/awc/AITools Методичка "Написание статей по ИИ в эпоху больших языковых моделей" (2025) от AIRI: https://airi.net/upload/ai-writing-in-the-llm-era.pdf Вместо слова "написание" тут уместнее "редактируемая генерация". 😎 Уже давно очевидно то, как в AIRI пишут статьи, а тут сами признаютс…
🤔8❤4
Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция "Цифровизация: теория и практика" (19–20 ноября 2026, Иркутск) https://digit.bgu.ru/ Тематические секции: 1. Математическое моделирование, численные методы и комплексы программ 2. Системный анализ, управление и обработка информации, статистика 3. Искусственный интеллект, машинное обучение и анализ больших данных Дедлайн подачи тезисов и регистрации: 30 сентября 2026 С…
❤3
File, posted without a caption
❤3
Обзорная статья "Простые правила для простых моделей" A. Messe, C.C. Hilgetag, M.T. Hutt, Simple rules for simple models, Phys. Life Rev. 55, 217–228 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.006 Перевод аннотации: В мире, где доминируют крупномасштабные численные симуляции и приложения машинного обучения в биологии, медицине и нейронауке (и в изучении сложных систем в целом), стимулируемые доступностью "боль…
❤5👍3
Международные научные журналы о смерти Субъективно, таких журналов известно три, но один (причем самый интересный, см. ниже) давно прекратили печатать: 1. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying https://journals.sagepub.com/home/OME Междисциплинарный журнал об исследованиях процесса умирания от старости, неизлечимых заболеваний, несчастных случаев со смертельным исходом и т.п., а также о психологических аспектах при у…
❤7🤔2
File, posted without a caption
❤9
Глава "Основы нейрофизики" P. beim Graben, Foundations of neurophysics, In: P. beim Graben et al. (Eds.), Lectures in Supercomputational Neuroscience: Dynamics in Complex Brain Networks (Springer, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73159-7_1 Перевод аннотации: В этой главе представлен вводный курс по биофизике нейронов, включающий обсуждение ионных каналов, активных и пассивных мембран, потенциалов действия и…
❤9
Всероссийская научная молодежная школа-конференция "Химия, физика, биология: пути интеграции" (14–16 октября 2026, Москва) https://chemphysbioint-conf.ru/ Конференция организована Институтом химической физики им. Н.Н. Семенова РАН. Формат проведения конференции – очный и заочный. Участники, выбравшие заочный формат участия, публикуются в сборнике конференции без выступления. Есть секция "Фундаментальная и прикладн…
❤4
International Conference on Drones, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (8–10 December 2026, San Antonio, USA) https://emergingtechnet.org/DRAS2026/index.php Paper submission deadline: 10 September 2026
👍3
Постдок по NeuroAI (Тулуза, Франция) We aim to take inspiration from neuroscience and cognitive theories to build deep neural network models of cognition, capable of integrating or "grounding" information across sensory and linguistic modalities, and of displaying flexible cognitive behavior (see details here). Our lab is part of the CerCo Institute as well as the Artificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Instit…
❤5👍2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NeuroMetric. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NeuroMetric” (@NeuroMetric), 1,751 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeuroMetric.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.