Channel
@Notes_On_Liberty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,699subscribers
+320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001264717994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Notes_On_Liberty |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Notes_On_Liberty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 6,699 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 6,712 | -29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 6,741 | +107 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 6,634 | +20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 6,614 | +37 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 6,577 | +45 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 6,532 | -39 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 6,571 | +204 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 6,367 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 6,373 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 6,379 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (7 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,643 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
513 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 229 | 44.6% | |
| 👏 | 72 | 14.0% | |
| 🤣 | 72 | 14.0% | |
| ❤ | 69 | 13.5% | |
| 👌 | 48 | 9.36% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 2.73% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.975% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 513 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این آزمون فهم گرایش سیاسی بهتر از آزمونی، که پیشتر در مجازی باب شده بود، است؛ نه اینکه صددرصد تأیید کنم. سه آزمون دارد: ۳۶ پرسش، ۶۰ پرسش، و ۲۴۰ پرسش که دقّت بیشتری دارد. با آزمون ۳۶ پرسشی گرایش سیاسی خودم را نزدیک به واقعیّت تشخیص داد. به اعضای گرامی، و خاصّه آن دسته از کسانی که خود را خیلی ضدّچپ میپندارند، میسپارم که آزمون را پاسخ دهند. https://12axes.vercel.app/en ֎ میتونید از نتایج زیر همین پست شات بدید.
❤8👍2👌1
📃 مرض مصدّقمسلکی ➣ @Notes_On_Liberty ۲۵ امرداد سالروز آغاز رویدادهاییست که به عزل مصدّق ۲۸ امرداد انجامید؛ رویدادی که سرآغاز بحثها و جدالهای تکراری و پایانناپذیر تا به امروز بوده است. فارغ از بحثهای درونجناحی (بین دو فرقهی ناسیونالسوسیالیست) و دعواهای قدرتطلبانه، شناخت مصدّق امری حیاتی در فهم وضعیّت کنونی و علاج آن است. مرض مهلکی که فضای سیاسی ما بدان مبتلاست ریشه در عفونتی دارد که مصدّق و فرقهی موس…
👍26👌2👏2
یکی از پیامدهای زیانبارِ نظریّهی ماکس وبر دربارهی اخلاق پروتستانی (در واقع کالوینیستی) در ظهور سرمایهداری، نادیده گرفتن روند واقعی پیدایش سرمایهداری در ایتالیای کاتولیک و نیز در آنتورپ و جنوب آلمان بوده است. خطای فکری دیگر برخاسته از دیدگاه وبر، این تصوّر رایج است که کالوینیسم را مکتبی «مدرن» و انقلابی و خاستگاه اندیشهی سیاسی رادیکال و دموکراتیک میپندارد؛ حال آنکه اندیشهی سیاسی کالوینیستی و پروتستانی در اصل، …
❤9👍6👌1
کسانیکه قصد دارند فرزندانشان را تربیّت و هدایت کنند، باید این کار را از همان دوران خردسالی آغاز کرده و اطمینان حاصل کنند که کودکان کاملاً از ارادهی پدرومادر خود پیروی میکنند. اگر میخواهید فرزندتان پس از دوران کودکی همچنان فرمانبردار شما باشد، باید اقتدار پدری را درست از زمانی تثبیت کنید که او قادر به پذیرش فرمانبرداری است و درک میکند که تحت اختیار چه کسی قرار دارد. اگر میخواهید او برای شما احترام و هیبتی قائل …
👍13👌4👏3
«بنفشهزار شود تربتم چو درگذرم» ❈ صدای ماندگار آواز ایران خاموش شد؛ استاد ایرج خواجهامیری درگذشت. روانش در آرامش باد! ➣ @Notes_On_Liberty
💔14❤6👍2
🌟 به زودی این پست حذف خواهد شد لطفاً زودتر وارد شوید .💎〰 از فرصت پیش آمده استفاده کنید...✨️
⏰ با انتخاب گزینه موردنظر، به جامعه علاقهمندان دانش، هنر و فلسفه بپیوندید. 🎬 سینما 🥢 📄 فلسفه 🎧 موسیقی🥢 📖 ادبیات 📝 نقاشی 🥢 💡 علمی این پست تبلیغاتی نیست، برای پیشرفت و رشد شماست... 👈 لینک ورود به پوشه ➡️
حزب دموکرات آمریکا نه اصیلترین حزب در آمریکاست و نه از ابتدا راستگرا بوده که حالا چپگرا شده باشد! این حزب همواره، از ابتدای پیدایش، پشتیبان ایدههای چپگرایانه بوده و همواره تغییرات عمدهای را در ساختار ایالات متّحده پدید آورده است؛ حزبی که ظهورش با انتخابات ۱۸۲۴، اندرو جکسون و دگرگونی فاجعهبار نظام انتخاباتی آمریکا پیوند خورده، مدافع سیاستهای انبساطی و تورّمزایی مانند free silver بوده، پیشگام تصویب متمّم شانزده…
👌7👍3❤1
📃 استبداد نوین و شیوههای آن (۲) | ✍🏻 ویلیام هنری چمبرلین ➣ @Notes_On_Liberty هیچیک از ترفندهای سرکوب و قساوت اداری را نمیتوان یافت که دیکتاتوریهای فاشیستی از عملکرد اتّحاد جماهیر شوروی نیاموخته باشند یا نمیتوانستند بیاموزند. آنها خود را شاگردانی بسیار مستعد نشان دادهاند. کتابهای بسیاری دربارهی شکنجههای روحی و جسمی افرادی که در چنگال «گ.پ.او»ی شوروی (که اکنون تغییر نام داده)، گشتاپوی آلمان و پلیس سیاسی …
❤8👏4👌3
واکنش اونی که کلیهش رو فروخته تا آیفون بخره به مکاشفات رفیق تدینوف:
🤣26👍3👏2
از چهارشنبههای سفید تا بادکنکهای سفید؛ داستان توهم مبارزه!
🤣20👍7👌2
رفیق تدینوف به رفیق وُزنِسِنسکی در جلسهی گسپلن: مردم پولشون رو طبق سلسلهمراتب ضروریات خرج میکنند، هیچکس، تأکید میکنم هیچکس، اول ماه نمیره گوشی عوض کنه. همه اول میرند سراغ شکم، پس ما بیایم شکمشون رو سیر کنیم. گوشی و سفر استانبول مهم نیست. من این برنامه رو براساس دانش عمیقم تدوین کردم. رفیق وزنسنسکی: ایول رفیق! کاش امثال تو رو بیشتر داشتیم. تصویب شد.
🤣26👌2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @Notes_On_Liberty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“On Liberty | دربارهی آزادی” (@Notes_On_Liberty), 6,699 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Notes_On_Liberty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.